{"contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

Newsvine Q & A: Chuck Todd on U.S. Politics

I'm Chuck Todd, NBC News Chief White House Correspondent and author of "How Barack Obama Won." Please join me for another Q&A session here on Newsvine where we'll be discussing U.S. politics. Feel free to post your questions here in advance, and remember to vote for your favorite questions by clicking the small arrow in each comment box. Click here to read my last Q&A. You can also read more political news and analysis on Firstread.msnbc.com.

{"contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 242
{"commentId":5994308,"authorDomain":"mikeyfil"}
Mike-336503Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

What the hell is wrong with you so-called journalists who are so aghast at Robert Gibbs' comments about Dick Cheney??? The man is a psychopath, a liar, a torturer who deserves to be in jail, not fawned over by the likes of you, John King and Chip Reid. Why is it ok for him to make scurrilous remarks about Obama who has been in office for mere weeks?? Where is your "outrage" about that??? Why is it ok for Republicans to talk trash about Al Gore and Jimmy Carter? Where was your call for respect then, you hypocrite??? The problem with our country is lawbreakers like Bush and Cheney aided and abeted by the main stream corporate media who wouldn't know truth and balance if it came up and bit them. Your wife worked for McCain, right? Maybe you are just too biased to continue as a newsman.

{"commentId":5994308,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"mikeyfil"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 3:00 PM EDT
{"commentId":6122340,"authorDomain":"lbj728"}

Ditto,

Both Bush and Cheney should be making any comments they have from the comfort of a jail cell, for crimes against humanity. Maybe Cheney's "Halliburton" buddies would build the jail for free. They have certainly been given enough freebies, where they owe the American people at least that.

 

{"commentId":6122340,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"lbj728"}
  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:18 AM EDT
{"commentId":6130623,"authorDomain":"lee-13"}

Yawwwwwn

{"commentId":6130623,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"lee-13"}
    #1.2 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:14 PM EDT
    {"commentId":6133348,"authorDomain":"jclark-1"}

    Why not just give each American taxpayer a check? Why give to those who are responsible for this mess? You could distribute the same amount of dollars to equally among all American taxpayers and I guarantee there would be spending that would stimulate the economy much more than the banks and execs holding the cash or distributing bonuses to a select few.

    {"commentId":6133348,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"jclark-1"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.3 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:01 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":5994393,"authorDomain":"mikeyfil"}
    Mike-336503Deleted
    {"commentId":5995601,"authorDomain":"gabby3239"}

    Chucky T please say it aint so, please tell us that you guys aren't like Fox News and that you know it is important to call a liar out on national TV, especially when you know that your watching and listening audience knows that the guest is lying even if he is and EX- Vice President.

    {"commentId":5995601,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"gabby3239"}
    • 11 votes
    Reply#3 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 3:27 PM EDT
    {"commentId":6035576,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

    It's amazing how folks decided to interpret what we wrote on First Read... my simple question was whether the president would want his team to use that tone with the former vice president. I was not condoning what the VP was doing. In fact, I'm shocked at his decision to essentially do to Obama what he criticized and got angry about with Jimmy Carter's criticism of George W. Bush.

    Overall, there is an argument that I think is pretty valid that says, particularly when it comes how the world views America, it's not healthy for former presidents and vice presidents to criticize sitting presidents and vice presidents... there's a way to do it, but diplomatically... and Carter was probably overly-blunt and crossed the line a bit with Bush and Cheney clearly has done the same with Obama.

    {"commentId":6035576,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
    • 12 votes
    #3.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:46 PM EDT
    {"commentId":6037906,"authorDomain":"syncbox2"}

    Really? You're surprised by hypocrisy from Darth Vader/Dick Cheney? Gosh... I know you didn't fall off of a produce truck, Mr. Todd. The last administration has shown nothing but hypocrisy and acted with contempt for anyone other than themselves and other corporate libertarians.

    {"commentId":6037906,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"syncbox2"}
    • 9 votes
    #3.2 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:18 PM EDT
    {"commentId":6075711,"authorDomain":"rsherry"}
    WiserNowExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

    I don't think Cheney is lying. I think your new President is a pathological LIAR. Look at all the broken promises he has made. This guy is not only a buffoon, he is a complete MORON. You just won't see the facts because you don't want to. Americans are beginning to awake to this clown, including me. I was fooled too until I did the research. And, boy did I find a lot of things that were NOT consistent with what he told us before he was elected. And, don't give me that crap that things change when they see what is really going on after the election. That is the biggest excuse I will ever hear, other than George Soros is probably telling this buffoon what to do. The man is a Socialist. You don't remove the wealth to get wealth. You encourage the wealthy to spread their money around. You don't steal it from the middle class and hand it over to CEOs. You encourage them to hire more, create more - that's how you enrich our economy. Read your basic economics. I hope Obama is impeached. He is ruining our Constitution. There is NOTHING wrong with the current Constitution. It was meant to protect the average American rights. Upper eschalon people have a problem with that because they then, cannot control the average American because of the Constitutional protections. Obama is a Marxist, and if you don't know what a Marxist is, then PLEASE look up the definition and compare that to what he has done thus far. BINGO! Do you want to live in another Russia where there is no Middle Class, only poor and rich? Do you want to let the government run every hour of your day? If you do, then move to Russia. Don't ruin it for the rest of us here who like our liberties given to us under the Constitution. Shame on you. Shame on you. IF you are a God-fearing man, then you should know that God does not approve of these policies. God doesn't force anything on you, so why does man do it? Think man. Think this thru.

    I will tell you one thing: Obama hiding his birth certificate, going back on his campaign promises, stealing the American people's money (ignoring their pleas), starting this stupid arrogant unrealistic 'volunteer' civilian army (if you're forced to do this service, then why is it called volunteer?), having Geitner on his staff and an idiot like Biden, either those who voted for him were brain-dead at the time, on drugs, or mesmerized by the devil himself, to vote this moron into office.

    I say impeach him and Biden and have new elections. I don't care who gets in as long as they stop spending the money we don't have and they honor the U.S, Constitution.

    My grandchildren will paying this debt off, and their children and their children. Think about what this president and this dumb congress is doing to our country!

    So far, this administration has done exactly the opposite. of what they have promised . Oh, I am a registered Democrat, so don't tell me I am not. I wanted to retire in 2 years, now I cannot because of your idiotic president. He certainly isn't my President because if he were, he would show much more class and wisdom. And his Wife - please, don't get me started on her. She's an intellectual moron, as well.

    That's all I have to say and NO I do not feel better because my neighbors have lost their jobs, my neighbors have to sell their possessions to eat, my neighbors may lose their home, all because this President hasn't a clue as to what he is doing - or he does know and just doesn't care. He was brought up as a Marxist, he is a Marxist.

    May God help us all, because as human beings, we've blown it.

    {"commentId":6075711,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"rsherry"}
    • 24 votes
    #3.3 - Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:04 PM EDT
    {"commentId":6076035,"authorDomain":"gabby3239"}

    Your argument would make sense if George Bush hadn't left the nation 10.7 Trillion Dollars in debt. But your entire argument is facetious as it just list Republican talking point after talking point, if you want your thoughts to be taken seriously start off with the mess creators before you attack those that are trying to solve the problem created by misguided Republican policies.

    {"commentId":6076035,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"gabby3239"}
    • 25 votes
    #3.4 - Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:29 PM EDT
    {"commentId":6103082,"authorDomain":"frank7rock"}

    Thanks for your rant Wisernow. I think you heart is in the right place. But for the good of the country can you do us this. Can you instead of just ranting baseless accusations and name calling, give us specifics detailed instances where the New President has violated the constitution or where specifically he lied and about what or a rational arguments of why he should be impeached, I would be really curious to know. Thank you sie

    {"commentId":6103082,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"frank7rock"}
      #3.5 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:09 PM EDT
      {"commentId":6114594,"authorDomain":"hpsmoker"}
      Peggy SmokerExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      Mr Todd:

      My question for President Obama:

      Mr President,

      Why are you blocking exploration of criminal charges against the Bush administration? Your position is dishonest and I don't want to see you as a dishonest person. It is not yours to block, it is already apparent that there was torture, many have seen and sd so. I would like to you see you "get out of the way".

      {"commentId":6114594,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"hpsmoker"}
      • 43 votes
      #3.6 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:03 PM EDT
      {"commentId":6115004,"authorDomain":"alohajan"}

      I think that is a great question to pose.

      {"commentId":6115004,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"alohajan"}
      • 6 votes
      #3.7 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:21 PM EDT
      {"commentId":6115246,"authorDomain":"davidthomaswebb"}

      I am with you Peggy! Let there be light! Let Justice rain down on the Bush/Cheney Interrogation and imprisionment practices! They act like big heroes who are ready to joust over their great achievements. Let the tournament begin in US federal court! DTW

      {"commentId":6115246,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"davidthomaswebb"}
      • 15 votes
      #3.8 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:33 PM EDT
      {"commentId":6115464,"authorDomain":"kismit-star"}

      Mr. Todd,

      I would also like the answer to this question. I would really like to see Cheney get a subpoena from Eric Holder.

      {"commentId":6115464,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"kismit-star"}
      • 18 votes
      #3.9 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:44 PM EDT
      {"commentId":6115794,"authorDomain":"kdeff"}

      "WiserNow" needs to get a new name. How about "StillStupid"! Cheney wouldn't know the truth if it smacked him in the face. You need to get a life and quit watching Fix News and the right wing idiots like Rush Limbaugh. Barack does not need George Soros or any other left wing fool to tell him what is right. Torture is against the law. Cheney, Bush and Rumsfeld broke the law. They should be punished. Case closed.

      {"commentId":6115794,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"kdeff"}
      • 14 votes
      #3.10 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:00 PM EDT
      {"commentId":6115897,"authorDomain":"SharnCedar"}
      Sharn CedarDeleted
      {"commentId":6115922,"authorDomain":"1lucky2java89"}

      The criminal investigation of Bush/Cheney/Woo/ ad nausem was my question, too. Glad to see I'm not the only one wanting to see those idiots in the straight-bar hotel.

      {"commentId":6115922,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"1lucky2java89"}
      • 14 votes
      #3.12 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:07 PM EDT
      {"commentId":6117631,"authorDomain":"spamspartan-1"}

      President Obama,

      I support your efforts to bring change to government but I have two major disagreements with your perceived policies. Here are the relevant questions:

      1. Doesn't your oath to protect and defend the constitution and your position as the head of the Executive Branch require you to direct the Justice Department to do a criminal investigation of the prior administration, based upon their public admissions of wrongdoing concerning torture and spying on Americans without a warrant in contravention of law?

      2. What medically defensible benefit does the Insurance industry add to our present health care system? In my observation, it gets in the way of proper medical diagnosis and treatment by adding cost, red tape and delay, if not circumventing treatment entirely by wrongly denying benefits to enhance profits. Why then is it reported that when considering options for health care reform you refused to consider a single payer system that removes this industry from our health care system?

      {"commentId":6117631,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"spamspartan-1"}
      • 18 votes
      #3.13 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:50 AM EDT
      {"commentId":6117807,"authorDomain":"blu20e"}

      right on man !

      {"commentId":6117807,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"blu20e"}
      • 3 votes
      #3.14 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:07 AM EDT
      {"commentId":6118636,"authorDomain":"krisa9009"}

      Considering the level of hostilities on the California/Mexico border, and the fact that a full %60 of those drug lords' total income is based on marijuana sales; has marijuana decriminalization now become a national security issue?

      How soon will we see the positive economic effects yielded from buying up those toxic mortgage assets?

      {"commentId":6118636,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"krisa9009"}
      • 6 votes
      #3.15 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:54 AM EDT
      {"commentId":6119784,"authorDomain":"cipsinc"}

      I want to know why our president and his justice department will not appoint a special prosecutor to expose the illegal interrogation policies and lies of the last administration? They clearly tortured with abandon. As far as I know, that is a war crime. It breaks my heart that Obama is dodging this issue. He promised to follow the Constitution. Its time to do that. Now.

      {"commentId":6119784,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"cipsinc"}
      • 10 votes
      #3.16 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 7:38 AM EDT
      {"commentId":6122349,"authorDomain":"brianf1313"}

      You got to be kidding. If the media were to call out a person for lying they would be calling out Mr. Obama just about every time he opens his mouth.

      {"commentId":6122349,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"brianf1313"}
      • 7 votes
      #3.17 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:18 AM EDT
      {"commentId":6123491,"authorDomain":"bbullion"}

      Chuck--my question for President Obama would be

      Why cant we pay the millions in bonuses to AIG-FP with the "legacy assets"? If they were such a good investment to begin with, then, maybe the idiots who bought them will make some money on them some day, and we dont have to pay bonuses to incompetent gamblers.

      Sharn Cedar--your idiotic comment completely baffles the mind. So--the new president didnt completely turn the economic crisis around, solve the social security problem, create a universal health care system, fix the medicare/medicaid system and bring ALL of our troops home by the end of his first 70 days. WHAT A LIAR???

      You are incredibly naive to think that anyone could do what you asked. As for the campaign promises, the man still has a bit of time to try and get to most of his agenda. You just need to get down off you high horse and STFU. Your man ruined this country, and has had over 4000 soldiers killed as well as hundreds of thousands maimed for life on a LIE!!

      My god -- what a maroon!!!

      {"commentId":6123491,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"bbullion"}
      • 4 votes
      #3.18 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:50 AM EDT
      {"commentId":6126123,"authorDomain":"lgllanclos"}

      Mr. President,

      How can the government ask the American people to become more fiscally responsible when the government, represented by you Mr. President, seem to have no intensions to balance the budget? When the American government can't pay the rent or mortgage for this month, they have the luxury to print more money or borrow extensively. Wouldn't it be nice if our homeowners could just print up some funds to pay the mortgage this month? What kind of example is this sending to the American people? Leadership starts with the top down. When will America start putting 20% down? Let's start leading by example Mr. President.

      {"commentId":6126123,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"lgllanclos"}
      • 10 votes
      #3.19 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:05 PM EDT
      {"commentId":6126303,"authorDomain":"movit3"}

      uhhmm , mr Obama . WHY?

      We have borrowed from china a major amount . in return / we buy chinees products at an amount they would not see elsewhere , then we pay china a large intrest on the monies we borrow ? some how this is one sided when , with prices flying after our min wage hike has caused us to not to be able to compete on the world market an only knowing that prices are still raising because cost of living has not balanced out , when in fact it cannot at this time .

      {"commentId":6126303,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"movit3"}
        #3.20 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:09 PM EDT
        {"commentId":6128307,"authorDomain":"REALITYCHCK"}

        I'd like to know if Obama's health care reforms are going to limit access to medical care for seniors on Medicare.

        I'd also like to know where the estimated cost of $2 Trillion for a Carbon cap & trade program is going to come from - it sounds like it will just get passed on to American families in the form of higher energy bills.

        {"commentId":6128307,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"REALITYCHCK"}
        • 3 votes
        #3.21 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:06 PM EDT
        {"commentId":6128433,"authorDomain":"REALITYCHCK"}

        Also, why does the United States spend more on education than any other country in the world, but our test results are among the worst? We've thrown more and more money at the problem, but without results - what's going to change?

        {"commentId":6128433,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"REALITYCHCK"}
        • 4 votes
        #3.22 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:10 PM EDT
        {"commentId":6129946,"authorDomain":"dad-4"}

        Chuck, for tonight's discussion---

        WHEN is President Obama & Congress going to take some positive & decisive action against the oil companies for their daily price gouching & banks for knowingly giving out bad loans, instead of us tax payers simply paying them off with absolutely no accountability. It's against the law that encourages another boston tea party!

        JFS, Northville, MI

        {"commentId":6129946,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"dad-4"}
        • 1 vote
        #3.23 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:54 PM EDT
        {"commentId":6131362,"authorDomain":"kpswfg"}

        Hi Sir,

        Can you ask the President -BEFORE- we hand any more bailout money to AIG or anyone else, to please SEPARATE the difference among CDS holders who actually own CDO's and/or have ANY Mortgage Liability/Exposure....vs. those who have ZERO exposure to CDO's, ie Hedgefunds, etc..

        If they could then FREEZE pay-outs to any CDS related policies (or Derivative Contracts if you must) for those CDS holders who DON'T OWN any CDO's or Mortgages...

        They could cancel those policies(contracts) based on NY Insurance Law (where AIG was HQ'd) even though that division was based in London. They can simply refund their "premiums" instead of their "bets" on "losses" they never sustained because they never had any exposure to CDO's or Mortgage.

        How Hedgefunds were ever allowed to buy CDS's (insurance - derivatives however you wish to phrase it) in the first place FOR SOMETHING THEY NEVER OWNED, needs to be investigated as well.

        So Dear President, Can you #1) Freeze all TARP payments until you can qualify it with a NEW CONTRACT stating the recipients will defer CDS pay-outs until an Investigaton can be done.

        #2) Once they separate who owned CDS's and also owned CDO's vs those who had No Exposure and never owned any CDO's. Then they (AIG etc) need to send Requests to Geithner (maybe he could hire Satyajit Das lto help him sort it out) to decide IF the requests are valid.

        #3) Pay ONLY those who held CDO's.

        #4) Go after refunds to those who NEVER owned CDO's to begin with (if you have a problem sorting that out call me , I collected bills for over a decade, with unlimited subpoena power I could get us back BILLIONS).

        Can you please STOP people from worrying about millions when we could SAVE and RECOVER - Tens of BILLIONS !!!

        Thank you for asking Chuck. Sincerely, Kurt

        {"commentId":6131362,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"kpswfg"}
        • 1 vote
        #3.24 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:36 PM EDT
        {"commentId":6132183,"authorDomain":"mmontano"}

        Mr. Todd,

        This is a question for Mr. Obama:

        "Mr. President, when is the United States going to bring back our abandoned Korean War POW's who alive and working in the mines of North Korea?"

        There are over 450 Korean War POW's who have been forgotten and have been in captivity for over 50 years.

        Thank you

        {"commentId":6132183,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"mmontano"}
          #3.25 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:18 PM EDT
          {"commentId":6132235,"authorDomain":"laike"}

          I'm amused by the people who point fingers all the time ut never provide asolution. My brother hates capitolism, but has no idea what form of government will realistically work. I told him then lvie with capitolism, because if you get rid of it without a solution you have anarchy.

          Politics is the same, Bush threw money at the problem, so it's his fault. What does Obama do? Throw money at the problem because it's Bush's fault. Want a real fix? LET THESE CORPORATIONS FAIL. They're too big for survival and the longer we keep pumping money into them the logner it's going to prolong the disease.

          Want to help the economy? How about giving this money to small business owners and the franchisees of America who don't have any wasted overhead. You stupid people keep flocking to these corporations and feeding the big brother giant only to turn around and complain about it later. Auto manufacturors make too many cars and wonder why they can't stay in business: answer genius, you have such a large surplus it's not all selling. What about the Auto Worker's Union? Lifetime Retirement at the same pay rate? $28 an hour to do a monkey's job? That's what our money is funding.

          You want change in this country, I'd like to ask Obama: Ok, you're President now and you want change. When are we going to see this change? When are you going to take us in a new direction Mr. FDR? How long do we have to tolerate these same failed tactics from the same failed politicians before we say enough is enough and fire every last one of you? (because unfortunately the guillotine method has already been used). When are we going to stop suffering this plight known as globalization and free trade?

          Give me not only an answer to those, but act on it and give me a solution.

          {"commentId":6132235,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"laike"}
            #3.26 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:20 PM EDT
            {"commentId":6132959,"authorDomain":"kat1197"}

            I'm a single parent with a disabled child working full-time and going to school . I don't have time to follow the news and seem to only catch bits and pieces throughout the day. So the only thing I know is that I'm still broke, my family's broke, my friends are broke and we're all very nervous and afraid. So please tell me how all this stimulus money being doled out to the States will actually reach us on the bottom. We all get the feeling that by the time the money trickles through the hands of the politicians there won't be much left to help us back on our feet.

            {"commentId":6132959,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"kat1197"}
            • 1 vote
            #3.27 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:47 PM EDT
            {"commentId":6133919,"authorDomain":"ralphlopez2002"}

            Mr. Todd,

            Let's face it, Americans believe in torture if it will stop a terrorist attack, but the real news is the newly emerging "innocence factor." I'd like to see you ask the president:

            "Mr. President, with high-profile figures such as Larry Wilkerson, Colin Powell's former chief of staff, going public with revelations that many of the captured men we tortured in Guantanamo and other bases were innocent, isn't it important to get to the bottom of how bad this problem was? Would you consider taking a neutral position with respect to the appointment of a Special Prosecutor, rather than oppose it, as you have in the past?"

            Thanks for this great discussion.

            {"commentId":6133919,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ralphlopez2002"}
            • 1 vote
            #3.28 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:20 PM EDT
            {"commentId":6133926,"authorDomain":"atlantacallan"}

            The bias towards the ex administration is amazing to me. The country has moved on, and yet comment after comment is about Bush/Cheney. Why? Very few give them any credit for anything, most of the blame for everything and yet the Congress get a pass for all of it. Wake up people!! Get past your biases, open your brains and start solving some real problems....not who is going to prosecute W. I guess we'll be blaming Bush for the next eight years plus.

            As for which news agency offers the best 360 viewpoint...it isn't NBC, Chuck. You may express such objectivity on your blog, but watch your nightly news and "hard hitting" news shows. You will figure it out. In just 2 weeks time, every current politician has changed his or her mind 19 times about AIG and the stimuli packages. And yet, NBC doesn't question it when they have the multitude of chances.

            I don't like the comedian guy, but when Jim Cramer was ridiculed by that goofy looking comedian on his show, I thought at last some hard hitting journalism! And that was a comedy show....

            {"commentId":6133926,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"atlantacallan"}
            • 1 vote
            #3.29 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:20 PM EDT
            {"commentId":6134254,"authorDomain":"littleblueaussie"}

            Are all you people nuts? The Bush administration did the right things to keep us safe, for 7 years. I don't care if our enemy was tortured to get info.Do you think our enemy would lay out a table of tea and scones? They want us all DEAD! Do you know the horrible things they do to people they capture,have you forgotten Danny Pearl for one example? Have you all forgotten 9/11? Terrorists can not be reasoned with,ever. The "war on terror" is now called "man-caused disasters"and today I hear Obama is calling it "overseas contingency operation" - that is ridiculous and typical of liberals! Get your head out of the sand and wake up! Our enemy must percieve us as a weak nation now.They must be laughing at us as they continue to plan attacks.They are patient and will attack again! Everyone should be afraid... Leave the Bush administration alone.They did what they had to do to keep America safe. FDR did the same in WW11,they had to.

            As far as Fox News goes they are as they say, "fair and balanced". Fox has people from both sides and they discuss both sides. It seems like Fox is one sided to some as other channels are liberal only.

            {"commentId":6134254,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"littleblueaussie"}
            • 2 votes
            #3.30 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:31 PM EDT
            {"commentId":6134510,"authorDomain":"themama90"}

            I would like to know why after waiting for years after applying once you are finally granted SSI do you have to wait an additional 2 years to become Medicare eligable. In most states you are living on a very small income and if you are disabled Medical cost are sky high and you can get no help so you continue to do without care as there is no insurance avaliable.

            {"commentId":6134510,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"themama90"}
              #3.31 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:40 PM EDT
              {"commentId":7491216,"authorDomain":"blll"}

              Given the tremendous excesses and Unconstitutionality of the previous administration, do you feel that a special investigation should be conducted to explore whether charges should be filed against any individuals?

              I'm talking about torture, warrantless wiretaps, imprisonment of US citizens without charge or trial for in excess of 6 years, ignoring Congressional oversight procedures of intelligence operations, and unilateral warfare without Congressional authorization.

              {"commentId":7491216,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"blll"}
                #3.32 - Fri Jun 5, 2009 10:29 PM EDT
                {"commentId":7955100,"authorDomain":"prirates"}

                Lies are we talking about liers? Obama stated no new taxes for those earning less than $250,00. What is the energy tax? What is the tobacco tax?What is the new health care tax all about? He his renigged on taxing those above $250,000. He said he wouldn't tax health care benefits! He wants the terrorists to come to America.

                f

                {"commentId":7955100,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"prirates"}
                • 1 vote
                #3.33 - Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:21 PM EDT
                Reply
                {"commentId":5996026,"authorDomain":"nathanjohnson"}

                Chuck - my question is actually about the Microsoft Surface device that you used during the election season. Did you work with developers at NBC and/or MS to come up with new applications for the device, or did they just give you the apps and show you how they worked? I'm curious what it was like to develop apps for that platform, and what kind of input you had into its use. How long did it take from the time you had an idea about a new application, until it was a reality?

                Thanks,

                Nathan

                {"commentId":5996026,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"nathanjohnson"}
                • 6 votes
                Reply#4 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 3:37 PM EDT
                {"commentId":6037617,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                The Microsoft folks designed the Electoral College app specifically for us... they saw it as an opportunity to experiment with creating new apps for the Surface as it was marketed going forward. They were in the early stages of development so everything took time but that said, their programmers worked incredibly fast.

                {"commentId":6037617,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                • 3 votes
                #4.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:08 PM EDT
                {"commentId":6130807,"authorDomain":"patb-1"}

                Q #1 When is government going to do something for the people instead of the banks like cap interest rates at 18% and abolish crazy credit card 20, 30, &45% rates?? seems fair after bailouts

                Q #2 Why is he going against every single campaign promise?

                Q #3 Why is government such a dog and pony show where they say things but nothing gets done??

                Q #4 Is he a supporter of the new world order?

                {"commentId":6130807,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"patb-1"}
                • 4 votes
                #4.2 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:19 PM EDT
                Reply
                {"commentId":5997116,"authorDomain":"Jen56"}

                Hi Chuck -

                In the last thread, I filled you in on the Tedisco/Murphy race and mentioned that Tedisco had said he would reject RNCC funded commercials as they were attack ads. He wanted commercials that would show "the real Jim."

                Well I can tell you that despite what he said, the RNCC is still running negative ads non-stop and so is some other group. "The real Jim" ads run, but so do the negative ones. And now in response to badgering from Murphy about his position on the stimulus, Tedisco has come out and said he is against it. Local pundits are saying he has decided he must come down on the conservative side rather than the moderate side.

                Murphy has said that he has information indicating that a majority of independents are in his camp. If that is true, and if upstate New York, generally Republican (or at least the moderate version of the Republican party), elects Murphy, I would think Snowe, Specter and Collins would be very interested in the outcome...

                {"commentId":5997116,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"Jen56"}
                • 5 votes
                Reply#5 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 4:01 PM EDT
                {"commentId":6037737,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                interesting info; thanks for sharing... I think the next development I'm curious about... will Obama or Biden campaign for Murphy...

                {"commentId":6037737,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                • 1 vote
                #5.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:12 PM EDT
                {"commentId":6124225,"authorDomain":"jhp73"}

                What are you going to do about the CORRUPT credit system? It needs to be blown up and start over it is the root to our problems. The only people you are helping are the rich since they are the only ones who are having access to infused money. They will just hoard it not spend it.

                {"commentId":6124225,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"jhp73"}
                • 6 votes
                #5.2 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:11 AM EDT
                {"commentId":6126382,"authorDomain":"dbleland"}

                Amen, god for bid if one of us tax payers filed chapter 11 or chapter 13 like a lot of these company's are doing we will be penalized and hung out to dry. Get rid of the credit system and start over.

                {"commentId":6126382,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"dbleland"}
                • 2 votes
                #5.3 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:12 PM EDT
                {"commentId":6127244,"authorDomain":"tstubblefield"}

                Mr. President-

                1) I would like to know why you think my government is entitled to a larger share of my hard earned paycheck than I am entitled to and why you think the government is more capable of spending my money more wisely than I am.

                2) I would like you tell us why far left liberal extremism is better for us than far right conservatism and how can you criticize the prior administration for their partisan ways when you in fact are even more partisan?

                3) Why do you feel it is okay to have a treasury secretary or charirman of the powerful house ways & means committee cheat on his taxes while it is not okay for the average taxpayer to do so? What kind of example do you feel that sets?

                Thank you.

                {"commentId":6127244,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tstubblefield"}
                • 4 votes
                #5.4 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:36 PM EDT
                {"commentId":6129255,"authorDomain":"rlmconnect"}

                Your comments and questions are totally off the wall given the crimes of the last administration. Did you ask such pointed questions of the last administration that caused the mess we are now living with?

                {"commentId":6129255,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"rlmconnect"}
                • 1 vote
                #5.5 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:34 PM EDT
                {"commentId":6132882,"authorDomain":"ier"}

                tiredof theflies please stick to the present. How do you know if he asked the questions or not, He is asking them now and is entittled to do so.

                {"commentId":6132882,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ier"}
                  #5.6 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:44 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":6133306,"authorDomain":"tstubblefield"}

                  tiredofthelies- Your remarks are rude and confrontational. Chuck Todd did not ask "What questions I wanted to ask the prior administration", he asked what questions we had for THIS administration. The prior administration is not asking for a bigger percentage of my paycheck and the prior administration did not nominate tax dodgers. While I am more conservative than liberal I am definitely more moderate than both. If you're truly "tired of the lies" then you should be done with this President, shouldn't you?

                  {"commentId":6133306,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tstubblefield"}
                    #5.7 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:59 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":6137391,"authorDomain":"Loki4368"}

                    Really ???Done with this Pres already huh? we atleast gave mmmBush a chance to screw up. You so called conservitives sure we not conservitive with the economy were you? srewed it up from jump street by deregulating so that the rich get richer and the poor pay the price now. Keep your conservitive ideas to yourselves from now on would ya and save the broke people some grief. I for one and not a dem or a rep i am an independent and i am a construction worker who finds himself out of work and no prospects on the horizon thanks conservitives i really appreciate it oh and btw i have kids who have school supplies to be paid for and B-day presents daddy can't afford now. Mucho thanks!

                    {"commentId":6137391,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"Loki4368"}
                      #5.8 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:58 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":7972186,"authorDomain":"prirates"}

                      Mr Obama is not President! He a lier and thief. He does promote killing babies and stopping the beating hearts of unborn children. Next, he'll hold back medical services to kill senior citizens. Why doesn't he produce a birth certificate to calm the American people?

                      {"commentId":7972186,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"prirates"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #5.9 - Wed Jul 1, 2009 4:26 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":5997441,"authorDomain":"parrtway"}

                      Hey Mike, seems like you need to take some meds and calm down. Even I don't like the way of some reporters, but, I think they get the hint.

                      On to another topic. This whole thing with AIG. I've made my opinion clear already, but, I ask this about bailouts the Congress seems to have done, too. The Fed is not connected to the government, right? We have the Treasury. So, if the Fed has "loaned" these companies money on it's own, then the taxpayer "should not" be on the hook at all for any of it, right? It's the Fed, that will be on the hook. If Congress made this Tarp, and other bills, then it is in a sense, promising taxpayer backing of the Fed, and the companies involved, right? Why? Where's our agreement in all this and when will I receive my note that says what investment I have, and interest payments I will receive? Congress is in effect, acting as broker for me, unwillingly, I might add. I didn't ask for it, nor did I have a say, well, I did, and I have the letters from my congressman and Senator to prove it, (I told em NO!). So, my question would be: Isn't that illegal? Have my rights as a taxpayer and citizen been violated by a government and a private company in the bailout (loan) of my tax dollars to a bunch of private companies? This would mean to me, that our national debt, will not be affected if the Fed assumes the risk, since this isn't taxpayer money, in reality. But if the government (insures) the debt by the Fed, then the taxpayers are now insurers, and now at risk, as is the national debt.

                      My thinking here, is that if the Fed has undertaken this risk, and had the government not stepped in, then we, as a nation, would not be all ticked off about it, and it would not be the nation's, therefore the taxpayers debt. Congress never should have had any, I repeat any, bailout bills at all. Let the Fed assume the risk. Now we have the bills, we are in this, the anger over party lines Dem and Rep, should be directed at the parties, both of them, as a whole, not along party lines. They involved us in something that was not our fight. Sound familiar? The economy was altered over years by false pretenses (inflated values, accounting practices, and fraud, etc.), and the bailout was therefore, also done under false pretenses.

                      I am not saying that all politicians are guilty, some tried to fight with their votes, but the mass of the rest, hurried, in my opinion, without thinking it through, these bills without questioning the validity of the information they received, which makes them clueless in financial circles, and easily duped. Once the bills were in place, they'd look stupid as they are now, and the companies pulled a fast one. Isn't there a law against what they have done? And if it applies, then these bills and contracts that are spoke of, can be broken legally, with no questions, in court. It'll be interesting to find out if this gets to a real court of law.

                      I probably will think more on this, but this is my opinion as of now. If I'm wrong here, please enlighten me.

                      {"commentId":5997441,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"parrtway"}
                      • 3 votes
                      Reply#6 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 4:08 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":6000682,"authorDomain":"parrtway"}

                      I have one more thing I thought about while I was out. With the above being said, what about the lobbies voluntarily, or paid, lobbying Congress as they did? If what I say above is under false pretenses, then also, would it not be assumed that the lobbies are also lobbying Congress under false pretenses as well? Wouldn't that give Obama and Congress some room to go after them and regulate their actions, for their actions and "donations (gifts)"?

                      {"commentId":6000682,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"parrtway"}
                      • 3 votes
                      #6.1 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:54 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":6037902,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                      You are getting at an issue that I think is a function of a broken Congress. Not because of the members but because of the system... Congress can't work when asked to write legislation quickly... and that's not healthy for the country. We shouldn't assume that we should have to wait on Congress to take its time, they ought to be able to write transparent legislation quickly and right now, they can't. That's something folks in Congress ought to work on fixing.

                      {"commentId":6037902,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                      • 4 votes
                      #6.2 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:18 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":6075836,"authorDomain":"rsherry"}

                      The only broken thing about this system is term limits. It isn't broken. If we had term limits, then we could get fresh blood in Congress instead of good old boys who are only concerned about their benefits and getting reelected. I sure hope there is a revolution to oust everyone of these people. I would gladly join it as I am really sick and tired of what they are doing, especially Pelosi who thinks she is god. Someone should physically throw her out of Congress. Maybe they should threaten her family like the CEOs families were threatened.

                      I really think the only way this system can be fixed is to eliminate it all and start over as our founding fathers did, leaving the Constitution intact, holding brand new elections for a new President and new Congress. These people have bankrupted this country and ruined our credibility as a nation. If you do not see that, and still think that a few hand-slappings will do the job, then I feel very sorry for you. Either you are a bleeding heart liberal or you are just plain stupid. I actually think you 're both.

                      {"commentId":6075836,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"rsherry"}
                      • 3 votes
                      #6.3 - Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:14 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":6087369,"authorDomain":"midgebaker"}

                      (cc: sent to Pres.Obama)

                      Open Letter to the Senate and House:

                      Stop your bickering about blame. Stop trying to make political hash out every disagreement. We don't CARE who's to blame, we don't care what the CBO says, we want the problems FIXED

                      On the AIG affair, stop listening to their fear-mongering and terror tactics. It is not just the money in the bonuses, it's that they were paid at all to those who brought down our taxpayer-owned company.

                      Regardless of whatever loopholes were left in the law, regardless of who knew what and when, these greedy executives CHOSE to take the massive risks -- fraught with moral hazard -- which have so damaged the US economy. They then paid advertisers and set up agencies to encourage the public to overspend. They packaged them up and sold them to other banks and other countries. And when the housing bubble burst, the people they defrauded lost their jobs and homes and dreams.

                      1) Taxing to get back the bonuses won't work and is probably unconstitutional.
                      2) The unwarranted bonuses just paid were the morally-hazardous fruit of fraud, so charge them with it and sue as the company owners.
                      3) Going forward, it's simple: Unwarranted bonuses = No more bailouts. Period.
                      4) Repeal the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1998 and the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000.
                      5) Use the Anti-Trust laws to break up AIG (and other financial giants) so it is no longer possible to be "too big to fail."
                      6) After the breakup(s), let us deal with the remaining US institutions, and let the other countries deal with their own.

                      We US taxpayers don't have the resources or the will to bailout the whole world. And we shouldn't be expected to.

                      "The Voters' Revolution"

                      1) We demand that you in House and Senate set term limits for yourselves. No elected legislator may serve more than four terms in office. This
                      acknowledges that it does take some acquired experience on your part.

                      2) We demand reform of the system of campaign contributions NOW. Each Legislator may add to your individual campaign "war chests" only the contributions of individuals. All corporate contributions MUST go into a general fund to be distributed equally to ALL candidates for election. This includes not just the Reps and Dems but the smaller parties as well. This would effectively level the playing field and give us voters more options. "Money talks" in campaigns. We voters must therefore control the money.

                      3) We demand the right to recall you elected officials by referendum. Our letters of our officials can be -- and often are -- ignored. I suspect that getting dragged back to your home states to explain to your constituents WILL get your attention. If you fail to explain adequately, we will THEN replace you.

                      {"commentId":6087369,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"midgebaker"}
                      • 18 votes
                      #6.4 - Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:59 AM EDT
                      {"commentId":6114215,"authorDomain":"nseago"}

                      Great points and spot on! Here, here midgebaker!!!

                      {"commentId":6114215,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"nseago"}
                      • 2 votes
                      #6.5 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:49 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":6116045,"authorDomain":"SharnCedar"}
                      the anger over party lines Dem and Rep, should be directed at the parties, both of them, as a whole, not along party lines.

                      The media is the guilty party, the common thread. It was they who pushed the urgency of the bailout, despite it being a known lie. It was they who force-fed the skeptical public, to silence their common sense.

                      Or do you forget who brought you the Iraq War? Remember embedded reporters?

                      Hah, do you think we would forget.

                      {"commentId":6116045,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"SharnCedar"}
                      • 4 votes
                      #6.6 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:14 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":5999304,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                      Chuck,

                      I have read some stories that Chris Dodd slipped amendments into the stimulus package to protect the AIG bonuses. You remember the stimulus package, the one that had to be passed so fast they didn't have time to read it. Is the story true? If so, will NBC report it? So far it looks like your coverage is about how the president and congressional Democrats are trying to "get the money back". Also read that Senator Dodd is one of the biggest recipients of AIG largess.

                      {"commentId":5999304,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                      • 6 votes
                      Reply#7 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 4:57 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":6025061,"authorDomain":"JakeV"}
                      In a stunning development, Sen. Christopher Dodd said that Obama administration officials asked him to add language to last month's federal stimulus bill to make sure the controversial AIG bonuses remained in place. -CNBC.com With AP and Reuters | 18 Mar 2009 | 07:02 PM ET

                      President Obama signed this bill into law, with great fanfare. Now he owns the policy he approved.

                      Chuck Todd's reporting on the AIG issue tonight (3/17) on Nightly -- in conjunction with Kelly O'Donnell's piece -- was about as partisan and biased as they come. O'Donnell reported uncritically on Barney Frank's pontificating, while Todd reported on Republican reaction by ascribing to them only calculated political motives. Chuck, you seem like a nice enough guy, but your reporting on this is disgraceful.

                      {"commentId":6025061,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"JakeV"}
                      • 3 votes
                      #7.1 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:11 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":6033446,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                      Looks like CNBC is becoming the renegade over at TASS... oopsy... I mean NBC. NBC Nightly News reported what we really wanted to know. Who the president picked in the NCAA tournament.

                      {"commentId":6033446,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                        #7.2 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:23 AM EDT
                        {"commentId":6033758,"authorDomain":"kentraci1011"}

                        If that's not your idea of news you probably get your news someplace else anyway. This is the place where we can ask Chuck Todd questions, right? not just another wing nut circle jerk.

                        {"commentId":6033758,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"kentraci1011"}
                        • 3 votes
                        #7.3 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:35 AM EDT
                        {"commentId":6035681,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                        KGMO,

                        The question is, "Why aren't they covering the Dodd angle on exec. bonuses?" Now Dodd claims someone from the administration made him do it. That sounds like serious news to me and even has the he said/he said angle newsies like but NBC doesn't want to cover it. People from Fox and CNBC are ripped to shreds on this blog regularly and Mr. Todd encourages back and forth so it is clearly about more than just "ask Chuck a question". The president is so insulated no one asks him tough questions. It is time for one of these reporters to step up and do their job. We are just trying to encourage Chuck to be the guy with the cojones who reports something other than the NBC/DNC informercial version of the news.

                        {"commentId":6035681,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                        • 1 vote
                        #7.4 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:51 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":6038176,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                        Calm down everyone... Number 1, nobody has been aggressive about pointing out Dodd's political problems than we have at NBC and on First Read... Second, the Dodd odd denial and then story change was on the TODAY show this morning... Third, Dodd was on Hardball last night where he got grilled about this... so the standard ridiculous charges folks like to make at NBC just don't pass the smell test. And I say this every chat, but I'd like to know if folks who make bias charges watch the news OBjectively or through their own prism of bias. I think I know the answer.

                        And I call 'em like I see 'em... The president played politics yesterday as I noted, by trying to protect Geithner and the Republicans played politics by trying to make Geithner the face of the AIG mess...

                        {"commentId":6038176,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                        • 4 votes
                        #7.5 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:28 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":6044331,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                        Chuck,

                        Number 1. Fox covered it much more agressively than did NBC. Number 2. Most people get their T.V. news from the evening shows and you didn't (so far) include it in that show. Number 3. We all look at the world through the prism of our experience and I am a crotchety old f--t who is still P.O.d about the way the media jobbed Barry Goldwater in '64. Number 4. Thanks for doing this. It takes a lot of guts and time to support a blog like this and even crotchety old f--ts like me appreciate it.

                        {"commentId":6044331,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                          #7.6 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:15 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6065093,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                          I included Dodd again this morning in my spot... and we're planning on doing a stand-alone on Dodd's problems going forward as well, politically in Connecticut.

                          {"commentId":6065093,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                          • 3 votes
                          #7.7 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:34 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6122614,"authorDomain":"sha-1"}
                          Number 1. Fox covered it much more agressively than did NBC.

                          John, they had to. After all Fox IS in the smear the dems biz. Sorry just calling it as I see it... that is objectively through my own prism of bias ; )

                          {"commentId":6122614,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"sha-1"}
                          • 1 vote
                          #7.8 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:26 AM EDT
                          {"commentId":6124384,"authorDomain":"tgjones6"}

                          Watch Glenn Beck if you want to be informed. He has principles that our leaders and news organizations DON'T.

                          {"commentId":6124384,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tgjones6"}
                          • 4 votes
                          #7.9 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:16 AM EDT
                          {"commentId":6127100,"authorDomain":"sha-1"}

                          Sorry TJ, I don't give Fox a second of my time. Best voice out there by far for me is Thom Hartmann, but he's more topics than daily news. Give him a listen, the guy is brilliant.

                          {"commentId":6127100,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"sha-1"}
                          • 1 vote
                          #7.10 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:31 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6128350,"authorDomain":"dds521"}

                          Here's a recap for you:

                          Dodd says that the language that allowed the AIG bonuses was written by him at the request of "Administration Officials." Those same "Administration Officials" are now in the process of writing new legislation that allows the Treasury Secretary to seize non-banking firms.

                          If you are following the plot line here, it stands to reason that the language that was "slipped" into the stimulus package was put there deliberately, in order to promote the legislature that would allow the government to write the new legislature that will allow them to seize control of the banking as well as the non-banking firms!

                          {"commentId":6128350,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"dds521"}
                          • 2 votes
                          #7.11 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:07 PM EDT
                          Reply
                          {"commentId":5999771,"authorDomain":"jackierawlings"}

                          Chuck a friend downloaded and save Obama's original Stimulus Bill which included NO BONUS to Banks which Congress quickly removed with support from Speaker Pelosi, Reid and Boehner. Now that the Banks are getting what they asked for Law Makers and Media are blaming the President. Hank Paulson just gave out the bailout money with no conditions attached with no Law Maker or Media reprorter asking one question. It took the Chinese Economicist to kick Hank out of China because he didn't know what he was talking about. I can't wait to see how the reaction will be when the Stimulus shows some success I bet George W. Bush will get the credit for the recovery and with peace talks with Hamas and Iran we'll hear it was the Bush Administration that brought about World peace and it was Obama who brought the chaos and Recession. I guess with the 8 years the public was feed lies and propaganda it can still work.

                          {"commentId":5999771,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"jackierawlings"}
                          • 3 votes
                          Reply#8 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:16 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6038698,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                          This whole bonus politics issue is typical Congress... the fact is no one was voting on this stimulus on this issue... in fact, why was this buried in the stimulus and not a stand-alone bill? Why isn't THAT the debate? Congress does too much in the dark

                          {"commentId":6038698,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                          • 5 votes
                          #8.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:47 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6045361,"authorDomain":"kayfry"}

                          I listened to every word of the AIG hearings and then I listened to NBC Nightly News. I have never heard such a whitewash. Dodd was not mentioned and what he got put into the bill. I have tried to stay with NBC because I watch their local news and wanted to watch a broadcast news station for local news. No more. This did it. I cannot depend on any reality in your newscasts. They are so slanted that I truly understand now that all I will get is what you want me to hear. I'm almost 69 years old and have never missed voting in any election, local, state, national. If I were to depend on what you report I would be vastly misinformed. We were told that the stimulas plan MUST be voted on immediately, doesn't matter no one read it. Now we are getting the results of that. And today Congress votes a special income tax on a specific group of people. Wait until they decide to crackdown on reporters - or maybe that fear is why you support these people so much. So sorry, was watching NBC when they first came on the air; now can't trust a word they say. You are no longer journalist - you push your own opinions and those of the politicians you support. You won't ask any hard questions next Tuesday night, you will fawn over your man, as you have been doing. Sad, sad situation.

                          {"commentId":6045361,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"kayfry"}
                          • 2 votes
                          #8.2 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:06 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6046240,"authorDomain":"shummel"}

                          What stimulus bill did Boehner ever vote for? Read, think, speak in that order.

                          {"commentId":6046240,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"shummel"}
                          • 1 vote
                          #8.3 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:53 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6065146,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                          Seems like folks have their pitchforks out... Is it just me, or are we living in a Simpsons episode that mocks mob rule where when the mob goes from one target to another without thinking about what we should be focused on regarding the entire crisis.

                          {"commentId":6065146,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                          • 7 votes
                          #8.4 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:37 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6072591,"authorDomain":"darkdingo"}

                          "All right fellers, get the rope... seems like one of them thar city-slicker reporter types needs a-lynchin'... "

                          [snicker] Sorry Chuck, I couldn't resist... just as I was starting to think this thread was starting to get a bit surreal, I came across your "pitchfork" comment, LOL.

                          {"commentId":6072591,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"darkdingo"}
                          • 2 votes
                          #8.5 - Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:56 AM EDT
                          {"commentId":6114251,"authorDomain":"sperrys"}

                          Welcome to the real Vine Chuck...pitchforks is putting it mildly for the most part! I have a question for Obama. Given Bush's stab at helping homeowners only ended up assisting 79 with loan adjustments, how many troubled homeowners does Obama's administration project to help? Especially given all the hoops to jump through, and obstacles inherently in place that will exclude so many?
                          Also, has he shifted to a "tell em what they want to hear" from a "tell em what they need to hear" mentality? What was all that pandering outrage over the Executive bonuses last week? Made me not only sick to my stomach, but also planned to give up my support of him if he actually intended to sign that silly bill...which, whew...heard he's backing down now...disaster averted!

                          {"commentId":6114251,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"sperrys"}
                          • 1 vote
                          #8.6 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:50 PM EDT
                          Reply
                          {"commentId":6001791,"authorDomain":"lilmagicdusty"}

                          i dont understand why the government is shrugging their shoulders on this AIG mess honestly its simply fraud if you went to the government for a business loan took the money and had a big party never intending to use it for anything but and letting the taxpayers pay for that loan you would be sitting in jail. if you didnt do your taxes right they sure caught that and took everything , you still stand a chance of jail time,they fraudently went to the government said were broke we need money got the money and basically said screw the working class pay for my party. if this is how their going to handle bailouts send a few million my way im sure i can make up some reason to take it. oh wait how about saying ill pay off big business, how many bailouts are we going to give before the country folds and only a few elite are running things? enough is enough NO MORE BAILOUTS

                          {"commentId":6001791,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"lilmagicdusty"}
                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#9 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 6:56 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6039285,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                          This anti-bailout mood is a real political problem for the Obama admin. I'm not sure this is what GM wants to hear, what Citibank wants to hear or any other struggling American company.

                          {"commentId":6039285,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                          • 3 votes
                          #9.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:08 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6087594,"authorDomain":"midgebaker"}

                          Dear Chuck and Deborah,

                          Read my reply "Open Letter to the Senate and House" elsewhere in this column, on the AIG bonuses. It's not that I'm against bailouts per se. I recogniae that more will prohahly be needed. I'm against being defrauded by the people we are bailing out. I'm anainst their arraogant sense of entitlement.

                          What I am FOR is using this bilout anger to force our dearly demented legislators to reregulate the financial services and the break them uo so they are no longer "too big to fail." I'm sick to death of having that little phrase thrown at me as a fear-mongerer's terror tactic.

                          {"commentId":6087594,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"midgebaker"}
                          • 2 votes
                          #9.2 - Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:20 AM EDT
                          Reply
                          {"commentId":6001960,"authorDomain":"ann1042"}

                          now I'm convienced that our government was conned in plain sight - what a crock. First, the government indicates that it's so stupid, it falls for the AIG scam, hands over the dough with clearly not one word of condition! Why these people have not yet learned to say "these funds cannot be used for employee bonuses or other similar payments" I cannot understand - even local boards I serve on understand such a principal.

                          This is not to mention the question of how could any employee earn a bonus when the company went caput by the actions of these very employees!?!?! There is something really rotten in the government's attempts to "help" these too rich operations. Please, I request that none of this come from my taxes - it's really difficult for me to pay but I get it done.

                          Yes, please let them go down on their own. The American system will rebuild something valid - beyond this outrage.

                          {"commentId":6001960,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ann1042"}
                          • 3 votes
                          Reply#10 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:06 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6039448,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                          I'm wondiering if the problem was that a bailout of AIG wasn't viewed as a government takeover. For instance, do you realize the size of AIG's bailout ($180B) is three and half times the size of the annual homeland security dept. budget? It's just nuts that there wasn't a government agent in charge of AIG from here forward. Why isn't that an AIG Czar?

                          {"commentId":6039448,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                          • 3 votes
                          #10.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:12 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6079496,"authorDomain":"reggie92"}

                          Mr. President, when exactly did you learn about the bonuses? Who told you about them? When did you and your treasury secretary discuss the bonuses? Who else did you discuss these bonuses with? Did you or anyone in your staff have conversations with Senator Dodd about certain parts of the stimulus? When were these? Were the bonuses discussed? Mr. President, you told the American public you were going to have the most transparent administration in history. Why did you ban press coverage on Thursday for your National Newspaper Publishers Assn. ceremony when they named you "Newsmaker of the Year?" I mean it was an award presented to you by the press themselves and you banned any press coverage. Why? And one more thing please Mr. President. The people really want to know when you are going to stop using teleprompter for your press conferences?

                          {"commentId":6079496,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"reggie92"}
                          • 5 votes
                          #10.2 - Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:12 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6124664,"authorDomain":"tgjones6"}

                          Chuck you mentioned Homeland Security and it's budget but when states like Texas and Arizona ask Nepolitano for troops she denies them. Can you look into why this is? Is she treating the border as a policy issue and not a enforcement issue? If so, she needs to be replaced.

                          {"commentId":6124664,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tgjones6"}
                          • 2 votes
                          #10.3 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:24 AM EDT
                          {"commentId":6133803,"authorDomain":"tstubblefield"}

                          This bailout pkg was "cram and jam". What should anyone expect when you carelessly put together a $800 billion "bailout pkg" with so little thought to details. No oversight, no time to analyze it and no one with any solid credentials to oversee it. In my belief, our current administration used "fear" to sell us a bill of goods, and used it as a diversion to cram their agenda down America's throat while no one is paying attention. Hopefully better minds will prevail and Obama will moderate his positions in a sincere effort to represent "ALL" of America and not just those that see the world through his eyes...

                          {"commentId":6133803,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tstubblefield"}
                          • 2 votes
                          #10.4 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:16 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6134611,"authorDomain":"squisshy002"}

                          I think this was just one big ponzi scheme on all of us. We all got punk'd. Bush was on his way out so they all lined their pockets knowing that we could not be stupid enough to vote the Republican party in again and thinking that change was going to come to Wall Street. So the fat cats set us up. In any case we need some relief out here right away we can't wait for the money to trickle down. Cap credit card rates!!! now!! So many people have lost their jobs and now when they go to try to get another one their credit is bad and they don't get hired.

                          {"commentId":6134611,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"squisshy002"}
                            #10.5 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:43 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":6002251,"authorDomain":"mandelman"}
                            {"commentId":6002251,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"mandelman"}
                            • 2 votes
                            Reply#11 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:23 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":6039930,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                            interesting op-ed. Well, I think Republicans lost so much in the last two elections that they don't yet see the political upside of going along to get along with the new Obama administration. What political points will they get out of helping Obama? That's how they are looking at things. Until they see themselves punished by voters for not working with Obama, they are probably going to continue to be a party that mostly opposes Obama. There's another way to look at this... the GOP fears it will alienate its base; they've already lost quite a few Republicans and they don't want to lose any more; the fear some have is that if they help Obama on some issues, they'll look as if they are straying even farther from their core conservative ideals and end up splitting their party base even more.

                            As a political strategy, I get what they are doing; the problem they have is indepdents, the swing voters of this electorate, aren't siding with the GOP.

                            {"commentId":6039930,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                            • 5 votes
                            #11.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:27 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":6046540,"authorDomain":"shummel"}

                            Chuck, please don't give such a lame editorial any validity. The reality is that the omnibus spending bill just continues discretionary spending ... ie funding existing programs, departments,, etc. By buying into this 2% argument you lend it credibility instead of looking at it from the perspective of where could the government had reasonably reduced spending and compared that to the 2% of earmarks. In this analysis the percent would be closer to 50%. Disgraceful ... this is the same BS that is being trumpeted in the budget ... let's load in the war funding (at the end of the war), reinvestment spending (one time short duration event) into the baseline budget, then claim we're going to cut it in half within four years to cloak an incredible increase in real year over year government spending at 3X inflation and based on incredibly rosy GDP growth assumptions (by the way, inflation is going thru the roof at the same time). Why don't we see this type of analysis on the news? You folks in the media think it's a game ... and it's not, it's real life. Please boil these numbers down to make them tangible to people.... $300B means $1000 for every man, woman, and child in the USA. Make it personal. Everyone is glazing over because it's all noise.

                            {"commentId":6046540,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"shummel"}
                            • 1 vote
                            #11.2 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:11 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":6065348,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                            I've pledged to answer everything asked of me on this. It's about being transparent... I agree that we need to put more context on numbers in general.

                            For instance, we should be constantly reminding folks that the gov't investment into AIG is the equivalent to 3 1/2 times the size of the Dept. of Homeland Security.

                            {"commentId":6065348,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                              #11.3 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:47 PM EDT
                              {"commentId":6080205,"authorDomain":"mandelman"}

                              G Sarazan and Chuck...

                              G you're missing the point of my editorial. It's not about numbers, it's about strategy.

                              And Chuck, when I watched this unfolding it was hard to imagine that this could really be the Republican strategy, as you mentioned, I thought they would have had much more impact appearing to support and assist President Obama than appearing to be so clearly obstructionist. I mean, a united vote against a stimulus bill... and the first bill introduced by a new president? At best, it seemed like a huge risk, especially considering the other factors involved.

                              However, I've come to believe they may be right in choosing this strategy... from a 2010 perspective. They're not worried about 2012, another national election, they're looking at seats in 2010, which is a state by state contest. So, if you look at the RNC base from that perspective, you're not looking to gain RNC supporters as much as you are to motivate the far right base in key states.

                              And in that regard, I think they've already been successful, as shown in several of the comments on this thread. Considering that we're talking about a president in office roughly eight weeks, it's remarkable that one could become a Marxist among other things in that period of time.

                              You understand my point... And thank you for taking the time to look at my editorial, I very much appreciate it and will most definitely repay the consideration.

                              {"commentId":6080205,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"mandelman"}
                              • 1 vote
                              #11.4 - Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:14 PM EDT
                              {"commentId":6128344,"authorDomain":"opustheory"}

                              Chuck, have we heard rumblings of establishing some kind of standard model for bailout governance? Over a certain investment threshold, they get a czar; over a greater threshold, they get a small department under the Fed, and so on? I've heard some economists say that gov't oversight can slow down a company's recovery, but we've been burned a couple of times now by that kind of thinking and we're past the notion of handing taxpayer money over without strict oversight. Is there any hint that something formal is likely to be established?

                              {"commentId":6128344,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"opustheory"}
                                #11.5 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:07 PM EDT
                                {"commentId":6133073,"authorDomain":"ier"}

                                Chuck I really don't care much about party affiliation, but I'm distress by the inability of the media in general to ask pointed questions of the new administration. I remember the past 8 years, not a move could be made without intense scrutiny, now when someof the proposals are clearlyun-constitutional we sit quietly in silence. WHY? I can not understand, we are more at risk today than ever before.

                                {"commentId":6133073,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ier"}
                                  #11.6 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:51 PM EDT
                                  {"commentId":6134757,"authorDomain":"squisshy002"}

                                  Ah what channel were you watching. The media hangs on every word, gesture, laugh or move that Obama makes. The press protected Bush and of course you could not speak out or you were arrested. Give me a break

                                  {"commentId":6134757,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"squisshy002"}
                                    #11.7 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:48 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":6136999,"authorDomain":"tstubblefield"}

                                    chamberton - Not sure what planet you have been on the past year but Obama was given a hall pass or get out of jail card by all the major media outlets, except Fox. Tell me what Presidential candidate could have survived the scandals of Rev. Wright, Ayers, ACORN and Rezko. McCain was a war hero and he was crucified...Obama was what?? You now see the "change" you were promised. How do you like it?

                                    {"commentId":6136999,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tstubblefield"}
                                    • 2 votes
                                    #11.8 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:34 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":6137383,"authorDomain":"bterryb43"}

                                    Exactly, The Republicrat! All he did was run his mouth about what he was going to do if he was elected. He never had to answer hard questions, and when he did it was ums and ohs. Katie Couric has an orgas*** everytime she mentions his name! I don't even watch the news on the major networks anymore. I want to hear the facts when I watch a news report, not their opinion on what the story is. Is it any wonder that half the newspapers in this country are folding? Opinions are for the editoral section of the newspaper.

                                    {"commentId":6137383,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"bterryb43"}
                                      #11.9 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:57 PM EDT
                                      Reply
                                      {"commentId":6002277,"authorDomain":"maureen-5"}

                                      My concern is that the media rather than reporting is acting as an agitator of public sentiment. A prime example is shrill demands by the media that the actions of the Obama administration show a positive impact within the first 100 days. The financial debacle we are experiencing didn't come into fruition over night and it won't improve in a matter of months. Most economists point out that employment normally is one of the last segments of the economy to improve. Business must see a return to demand for their goods and services before hiring recurs. Yet when the anti-Obama crowd starts nattering about unemployment I never hear the moderators call them on the reality. A calm, quiet discourse seems discouraged. Last but not least, when the conservatives start laying the responsibility for the downturn that started officially 11/07 on the Democrats who came into a majority in January '07 when it makes no sense.

                                      {"commentId":6002277,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"maureen-5"}
                                      • 5 votes
                                      Reply#12 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:24 PM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6012089,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                                      maybeblu,

                                      I don't see much of the media acting as an agitator. For the most part NBC seems to be a cheerleader for the administration. If you are seeing "shrill demands" the root causes may be the expectations set by President Obama's campaign in presenting him as the savior and the fact that news organizations are more interested in the story than the truth. The media has promoted the "First 100 days" story since before the president was elected to harken back to "those thrilling days of yesteryear" and America's Camelot. It is all pretty ridiculous but the whole media love afair with candidate Obama was unseemly. Now they have to promote the 100 day story and, unfortunately, the president seems to have fallen into the trap. In sports we used to call it reading your own clippings. When you start to believe all the crap that is written about you (good or bad) you are in trouble. This is compounded by President Obama's lack of management experience. One of the first things you learn when you run a business is that opportunities are infinite but resourses are finite. Good management means selecting the correct opportunities so you can apply your finite resources in the most effective manner. I think the president started with good intentions but his people are spread too thin and they are trying to meet artificial goals set by campaigns and media elites instead of focusing on doing things right. Once you fall into that trap too much time is spent defending what you have done instead of doing your job and you get behind the curve. The stress is starting to show on President Obama and his people.

                                      {"commentId":6012089,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                                      • 2 votes
                                      #12.1 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:25 AM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6028420,"authorDomain":"maureen-5"}

                                      John: I am through with the lobbyists and lickspittals on both sides. Both sides need to be reined in. I am just as likely as to flick through an Oberman diatribe as I am OReilly. If the callers weren't so tedious I would leave my set on CSpan throughout the day. Talk about a tough gig. Can you imagine being a CSpan screener. Ooooh not a career field found much in demand even in today's tough market.
                                      Your assignment tonight, should you care to take it: Write the job description for a CSan screener.
                                      Peace upon you.

                                      {"commentId":6028420,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"maureen-5"}
                                      • 1 vote
                                      #12.2 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:00 AM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6031972,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                                      Yeah those cable channel screamers ruin the news the way Dick Vitale ruins a good basketball game. I used to watch CSPAN and really liked the in depth interviews where people actually got to talk without the on air "personality" constantly interrupting like a little kid yelling "Look at me, look at me." I suppose it takes a pretty big ego to get into the position of T.V. personality but talented people should be able to check it at the door and see a higher purpose in what they do. Does Abraham Lincoln have any living direct descendents?

                                      {"commentId":6031972,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                                      • 1 vote
                                      #12.3 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:23 AM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6040085,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                      I have to say, I agree that the rise of opinionated TV commentary has made it harder for those folks to watch TV news who simply want good solid information; I think that's why we're seeing a collective rise in the ratings of the network news shows from the weekday to Sunday. It seems folks do want more info without the screaming.

                                      {"commentId":6040085,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                      • 6 votes
                                      #12.4 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:31 PM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6045570,"authorDomain":"JacquelineOBoomer"}

                                      Chuck - Congrats on working this blog. Just found out about it on the Obama Organizing for America blog. I've got high hopes you will bring cable news back around to legitimate journalism. I've taken to watching Brian Williams in the evening - or PBS - but I can't bear to watch what has become of Meet the Press. I have one question. As a correspondent, if you think the Obama administration has done something GOOD on any given day, can you just report that? Or do you always then have to say "but" and tell the negative side, from whatever perspective? Real journalism is so dead that I can't remember what the rules are. I'm being sincere; I would really like to know.

                                      {"commentId":6045570,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"JacquelineOBoomer"}
                                      • 2 votes
                                      #12.5 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:18 PM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6065528,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                      Interesting way to word your question... if it appears that a plan or an event goes well, you hear phrases like 'well received' -- I believe in observational journalism in addition to giving folks the What and the Why... the two most important questions I need to answer every night

                                      {"commentId":6065528,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                      • 4 votes
                                      #12.6 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:56 PM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6080335,"authorDomain":"mandelman"}

                                      Chuck... I think the reality we have to face is that cable news, beginning with FNC, has blurred the line between "news" and "editorial," which is a dangerous practice and one that has likely permanently changed our political landscape, or at least changed it for a generation.

                                      When I pick up a newspaper, I know that what I see on the front page is "news" and what I see on the op-ed page is opinion. If that were changed and a newspaper were to package its op-ed content to appear as news, it would create confusion at best. At worst, it would create a "War of the Worlds" type of broadcast. (Just imagine if that famous radio broadcast had been on television or on the front page of a major newspaper.

                                      Today, FNC doesn't offer news. It programs editorial, often packaged to look like news, and it chooses what it presents in order to confirm its viewers views of the world.

                                      What I'm saying is that two segments of our country now see and hear two totally different sets of "news". During past periods of deep divisions in this country, and the Viet Nam years come to mind, we were at least getting the same "news," and then interpreting it differently. Today, we are not seeing the same "news," and it is being programmed to a given audience much as a television drama would be.

                                      Jefferson called the free press the "fourth branch" of the government. In that context, I think these developments may lead to dangerous times in the years to come.

                                      {"commentId":6080335,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"mandelman"}
                                      • 2 votes
                                      #12.7 - Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:26 PM EDT
                                      {"commentId":6101695,"authorDomain":"todye4"}

                                      DANGER? DANGER? From a veriety of news sources? How would YOU suggest we go about "screening" what is able to be heard by the millions of INDIVIDUALS in this country ?HHMMMM? Hypocracy and Liberalism are synonimous for a reason!

                                      Look out,Your Elitism is showing!

                                      {"commentId":6101695,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"todye4"}
                                        #12.8 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:39 AM EDT
                                        {"commentId":6116018,"authorDomain":"kdeff"}

                                        I think there might be a newspaper that puts editorials on the front page disguised as news. They call it "The Wall Street Journal".

                                        {"commentId":6116018,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"kdeff"}
                                        • 1 vote
                                        #12.9 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:12 PM EDT
                                        {"commentId":6119364,"authorDomain":"tatateeta"}

                                        You're right. And the corporate media NEVER challenge outright lies and NEVER ask follow up questions. For real journalism, you have to watch TDS. Also, why does the corporate media have right wing crazies on all the time? And why don't they have left wing voices like Amy Goodman's? What's up with that?

                                        {"commentId":6119364,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tatateeta"}
                                          #12.10 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:17 AM EDT
                                          {"commentId":6135856,"authorDomain":"elianemribeiro"}

                                          I hope GE, NBC parent company is bailed out as soon as possible so that Chuck, Brian Willliams and the others can go back to being journalists not actors.

                                          {"commentId":6135856,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"elianemribeiro"}
                                          • 1 vote
                                          #12.11 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:33 PM EDT
                                          Reply
                                          {"commentId":6002827,"authorDomain":"americanspirit"}

                                          Tis so hard to take you seriously on TV. I get the giggles about how you are the manifestation of Danny Cincannon, even down to the beard. ; )

                                          {"commentId":6002827,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"americanspirit"}
                                          • 2 votes
                                          Reply#13 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:54 PM EDT
                                          {"commentId":6040278,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                          That's a first... I get a lot of, "you look like" but never Busfield

                                          {"commentId":6040278,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                          • 1 vote
                                          #13.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:37 PM EDT
                                          {"commentId":6102573,"authorDomain":"Ldyandrea"}

                                          I won't be worried until he starts flirting with the Press Secretary. *grin*

                                          {"commentId":6102573,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"Ldyandrea"}
                                            #13.2 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:42 AM EDT
                                            Reply
                                            {"commentId":6003480,"authorDomain":"kentraci1011"}

                                            Do you have time to chase down and develop real stories? or are you just stuck trying to get a quote on the story of the day?

                                            {"commentId":6003480,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"kentraci1011"}
                                              Reply#14 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:35 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":6040790,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                              It's a 50-50 mix, to be honest... toughest part of this gig.

                                              {"commentId":6040790,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                              • 1 vote
                                              #14.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:52 PM EDT
                                              Reply
                                              {"commentId":6003881,"authorDomain":"gdeanboyd"}

                                              Chuck:

                                              Love your coveraage of current politics, and although you have some large shoes to fill with the success of your predessors, you're off to a great start.

                                              I am sending a long a brief memo, recently sent alog to the attention of Barack Obama, C/O the White House, which is structured along a message sent to Clinton and Gore, over 12 years ago as they were attempting to emulate business in america with their vision of Government.

                                              Obviously, Clinton and Gore did not do anything, and it's too early to tell if the current president will do anything with the suggestion. Having you aware of it, may give it some additional mileage though and I would appreciate your thoughts.

                                              Memo, sent 3-16-09, am:
                                              -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Mr. President:

                                              In developing means and methods of helping the overall US Economy, now and for the long term future, I propose that one area with potential for significant savings and overall improvements in efficiency of government operations is in the overall organization of States.

                                              When our original individual States were founded they were defined by defensible boundaries, or other methods, that are no longer valid. That is why we have such diverse land areas in comparing say Rhode Island to Texas - yet both have two Senators. My suggestion, for consideration, and to reduce significant government operating cost, is to combine the overall states into national regions, reducing 50 states to 6 or 8 regions, more closely emulating large national business. Structure the modification over a ten year period, to allow an adequate time period for the transition, and at the same time consider a change in the constitution so that each regional leader, title to be determined - let's use Vice President, and modify the current Vice President Title to Senior Vice President, collectively forms a pool of candidates for the next office of President. In other words, the President would be elected by the people, but limited to the pool of 8 regional Vice Presidents that had previously served the country within their respective regions.

                                              A next logical step, following the above, would be to allow the Country of Canada to become integrated with modified United States of America representing two regions (due to limited population), and also allow Mexico to join us formally representing three regions.

                                              The end result, a true geographic North America that would compete as we do now, with Europe, South America, SE Asia etc.

                                              It is difficult to even estimate the potential savings but I think you will agree the amounts would be staggering, and would tend to make each of the 8 regions within the modified United States more equal to each other in overall land area, as well as population. The structure of the US Senate would have to be modified to allow a total of 8 Senators to be elected from each Region (if divided into 8 regions total), with the House of Representatives being a similar structure as today, with congressional districts to determine overall quantity of representatives, by population, per region.

                                              The above represents a radical change, but one that could be finessed into a timely and cost saving change that this country needs to become more cost efficient, and at the same time more competitive with the rest of the world. IT could also solve a few immigration issues we currently face along the borders, or at least shift those issues to the southern border of Mexico and Central America.

                                              I appreciate your consideration of the above suggestion, and look forward to yo9ur response.

                                              Sincerely

                                              Gary D. Boyd
                                              Age 55, Resident of Mansfield Texas, although have lived and worked within 13 of the existing states, as well as Canada and Mexico.

                                              Strong believer in free trade, NAFTA, and less but stronger, more efficient government.

                                              {"commentId":6003881,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"gdeanboyd"}
                                              • 1 vote
                                              Reply#15 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:59 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":6040949,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                              hmmm, an interesting proposal. I've always thought there would be a movement someday within some of Canada's provinces to join with the U.S. just as other provinces have talked about going totally independent. It seems our days of adding states and territories are behind us, but who knows... I do believe more official cooperation within the hemisphere is very likely...

                                              {"commentId":6040949,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                                #15.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:57 PM EDT
                                                {"commentId":6045417,"authorDomain":"ProfessorLee"}

                                                How about just breaking up some of the larger populated states into several smaller states so that the people can be better represented by their senators.

                                                As far as Canada and Mexico..Well we don't need to do the rest of your plan and still invite Canada and Mexico to join our United States.

                                                {"commentId":6045417,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ProfessorLee"}
                                                  #15.2 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:10 PM EDT
                                                  {"commentId":6065555,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                                  Some Californians, for years, have debated the idea of splitting up that state. I think there's an argument that a few states will become too big to govern, California is at the top of the list.

                                                  {"commentId":6065555,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #15.3 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:57 PM EDT
                                                  {"commentId":6098845,"authorDomain":"ProfessorLee"}

                                                  It would also liberalize the U.S. Senate if California split into a north and southern state. (No way would it split into one coastal and one land-locked state, despite the political differences of the California Central Valley, and the coast. Every state wan't the revenue from the trade ports.)

                                                  {"commentId":6098845,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ProfessorLee"}
                                                    #15.4 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:50 AM EDT
                                                    {"commentId":6116061,"authorDomain":"kdeff"}

                                                    There's nothing wrong with California. If you want to reorganize the United States, how about giving Texas back to Mexico. And as for Canadian provinces joining the USA - are you kidding me?!

                                                    {"commentId":6116061,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"kdeff"}
                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    #15.5 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:15 PM EDT
                                                    {"commentId":6119344,"authorDomain":"tatateeta"}

                                                    I really like the idea of giving Texas to Mexico.

                                                    {"commentId":6119344,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tatateeta"}
                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #15.6 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:09 AM EDT
                                                    {"commentId":6126293,"authorDomain":"jupiblue"}

                                                    Why would Canada want to join a failing empire? Seriously. Most of the Canadians I know living in the U.S. are packing up and heading home because our economic and social infrastructure is such a disaster. The standard of living and quality of life is much significantly better there than here.

                                                    It seems rather arrogant to assume that any Canadian in their right mind would want to give that up to join we Americans in our state of indenturement.

                                                    {"commentId":6126293,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"jupiblue"}
                                                      #15.7 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:09 PM EDT
                                                      {"commentId":7972502,"authorDomain":"prirates"}

                                                      canadians come here every week for health care

                                                      {"commentId":7972502,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"prirates"}
                                                        #15.8 - Wed Jul 1, 2009 4:39 PM EDT
                                                        Reply
                                                        {"commentId":6005736,"authorDomain":"jackierawlings"}

                                                        Chuck a retired friend from the banking industry just had us view tapes from 2000 till 2008. As the news calls Madoff, Enron and others the biggest Crimes in the History of America we haven't seen nothing yet. Right under our nose was I say the World's best Crime of money and Power. Goldman Sachs positioned themselves to unload their subprime debt and make sure as other well known companies fell yes Goldman Sachs would replace them internationally. Now as for Hank Paulson he was appointed to make sure the plan went the way it was suppose to. Hank has shares of Goldman Sachs and his own personal business to gain from the Crime. It was like following the dots to connect them. Yes many Law Makers were paid off for the vote others were just clueless. Ever wonder my Goldman Sachs changed to banking from investiment. Well by setting up the Bank the debt would be wiped clean then just drop the banking and go back to investiment. Hank's job was to learn all the customers of the fallen large companies. As for AIG this to was a set up and look for Goldman Sachs to big one of the largest investiment firms and taking AIG customers with them. This was careful planned and excuted with the US Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson making sure it works. Notice how Hank only hired Goldman Sachs people while he was Treasury Secretary. With no one asking questions it was so easy to do. This is something the Chinese Govenment knows and that's why they want to make sure we can pay the loan. I do feel bad for President Obama and his new US Treasury Secretary as they will have to regain the trust of other countries. The bonus money given by AIG was not mistake or contract agreement. If Geithner were to ever tell the truth about what he fines it would bring down this country. Look other crimes in American History the story will be written for the future generations. Madoff and Stanford will be peanuts compaired to the Crime Goldman Sachs committed and go away with.

                                                        {"commentId":6005736,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"jackierawlings"}
                                                        • 3 votes
                                                        Reply#16 - Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:09 PM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":6041219,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                                        Without going into detail on the Goldman issue, I'll promise you this, a lot of us are scrutinizing the Goldman angle very carefully... we believe there's a story there as well

                                                        {"commentId":6041219,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                                        • 3 votes
                                                        #16.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:05 PM EDT
                                                        Reply
                                                        {"commentId":6010363,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                                                        Chuck,

                                                        Here's a question for your next White House press conference.

                                                        "Mr. Gibbs, will the president and Senator Dodd return their AIG bonuses?"

                                                        Follow-up: "If they do, will they return them to AIG or to the American people?"

                                                        {"commentId":6010363,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                                                        • 3 votes
                                                        Reply#17 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:01 AM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":6014832,"authorDomain":"brownohioinsurance"}

                                                        Great Question!

                                                        {"commentId":6014832,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"brownohioinsurance"}
                                                        • 3 votes
                                                        #17.1 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:06 PM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":6019944,"authorDomain":"tad-davis"}

                                                        These were not "bonuses" but rather campaign contributions legally made through PACs and individual contributions. It's my understanding that AIG has contributed over $9 million in campaign contributions over the last 20 years to hundreds of federal candidates on both sides of the aisle. Whether that was excessive or not for a corporation of that size I don't have the knowledge to answer -- perhaps Chuck knows if it is or not.

                                                        John McCain received roughly $60,000 in campaign contributions from AIG ... I noticed you didn't include him in your questions. Should he, too, return the money?

                                                        Any ways, referring to these as "bonuses" is bogus, and the right-wing commentators who do so know it.

                                                        {"commentId":6019944,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tad-davis"}
                                                        • 4 votes
                                                        #17.2 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:23 PM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":6020880,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                                                        Get a sense of humor Tad.

                                                        The bottom line is whether you call it bonuses, campaign contributions or bribes the intent is to influence policy and I am not here to defend anyone who takes these bri... oops, contributions. When it is AIG or any of the other crooks the money comes out of the tax payers pockets. It is bizarre to see these grandstanding politicians feining outrage and pretending they didn't know what was happening. Especially when they claim to be the smartest people in the world and some of them wrote ammendmets to the stimulus package specifically designed to protect the bonuses.

                                                        {"commentId":6020880,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        #17.3 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:02 PM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":6038246,"authorDomain":"syncbox2"}

                                                        Yeah, sure. Right after George W. Bush returns his $200,000.00.

                                                        I don't know how much Cheney and the rest of the crooks got, but if you are going to start asking for campaign contributions back, let me assure you that after everything from corporate America is taken back... the only one left standing will be President Barack Obama. He may have contributions from corporations, but no one ever has had the amount of contributions from average people like myself.

                                                        I just love how the media reports "campaign contributions" from big corporations as IF the actual corporation itself sent the money. The information used by "fact checkers" encompasses all EMPLOYEES of a corporation when figuring totals - and everyone is required to list their employer (though NOT fact-checked for accuracy!). In SOME cases, they might separate out EXECUTIVE contributions, but mostly not. Just like when McCain was touting "Fannie Mae/Freddy Mac" contributions without separating out the average employees from the executives... where McCain's total far surpassed Obama's.

                                                        It's media skankiness at best. Just remember who was in charge pushing the TARP concept. And consider where we'd be if McCain had won -- given that his top economic advisor was John Thain... yeah, that's right. Former CEO of Merrill Lynch - failed business even WITH bailout funds; man with a $2M redecorated office; and don't forget that ML is about to hand out boneses that will make the AIG bonuses look like chump change.

                                                        {"commentId":6038246,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"syncbox2"}
                                                        • 2 votes
                                                        #17.4 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":6041030,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                                                        So syncbox are you saying your crook is more honest than my crook? Sorry, don't care much for either one. Wait a minute! Wasn't President Obama for public financing of campaigns before he was against it? Did he change his mind when he found out he could get millions from foreigners as long as the checks weren't over $25?

                                                        I say make all the bribes illegale or don't allow politicians to vote on any legislation affecting companies from which they took bribes. Politicians would have to spend time talking to their constituents instead of lobbyists. We might have true representative government.

                                                        {"commentId":6041030,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        #17.5 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:59 PM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":6041677,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                                        It's funny, I'm SHOCKED there hasn't been a movement for the return of AIG campaign money... It just may be worth a question to Gibbs.

                                                        {"commentId":6041677,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                                        • 2 votes
                                                        #17.6 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:21 PM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":6047160,"authorDomain":"shummel"}

                                                        Syncbox... three names, Raines, Johnson, Rubin ... you figure it out

                                                        {"commentId":6047160,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"shummel"}
                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        #17.7 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:51 PM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":6065623,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                                        ding ding ding... There's a lot of hypocrisy coverage to go around on this financial crisis... Larry Summers, for instance, actually testified in favor of the legalization of certain derivatives trading back in 2000, which arguably gave these financial firms the legal rope to hang themselves and our economy.

                                                        {"commentId":6065623,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                                        • 4 votes
                                                        #17.8 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:00 PM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":6124939,"authorDomain":"tgjones6"}

                                                        The mortgage mess started with Carter, then Clinton (really allowed the subprimes to take off), and then Bush. Bush might have looked the other way when Dems owned congress and pushed this thru in return for IRAQ support. The real culprits is Barney Frank and Chris Dodd but who's reporting on them?

                                                        {"commentId":6124939,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tgjones6"}
                                                          #17.9 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:32 AM EDT
                                                          Reply
                                                          {"commentId":6010493,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                                                          Chuck,

                                                          Will NBC's coverage of the AIG bonus brouhaha include anything about Chris Dodd's complicity in getting the bonuses paid or the money AIG has invested in our president and his Democratic colleagues or will it be another DNC infomercial featuring Barney Frank and Andrew Cuomo as white nights riding against corporate giants not run by one of Barney's boyfriends?

                                                          {"commentId":6010493,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                                                          • 2 votes
                                                          Reply#18 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:08 AM EDT
                                                          {"commentId":6041701,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                                          Answered above... see this morning's TODAY show and last night's HARDBALL...

                                                          {"commentId":6041701,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                                          • 2 votes
                                                          #18.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:22 PM EDT
                                                          {"commentId":6125171,"authorDomain":"tgjones6"}

                                                          It was more like HARDFEATHER. Chris Matthews let him off the hook at every chance. He asked some good questions but didn't follow up with anything more and left the viewer wondering if Dodd was the culprit or not. Definitely not a grilling.

                                                          {"commentId":6125171,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tgjones6"}
                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          #18.2 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:39 AM EDT
                                                          {"commentId":6125405,"authorDomain":"rosevictor"}

                                                          Um Chuck good answer

                                                          {"commentId":6125405,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"rosevictor"}
                                                            #18.3 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:45 AM EDT
                                                            Reply
                                                            {"commentId":6018081,"authorDomain":"tommi-1"}

                                                            While I am sure that all Americans appreciate the efforts being made in Washington to save us from ourselves… they have again overlooked a simple requirement for loan modifications which could cost taxpayers billions of dollars.

                                                            Much like the “overlooked” loopholes that allowed bonus payments, in excess of $160 million, to be paid to employee’s of Goldman Sach’s and AIG, the Obama loan modification program sets up the same windfall profit situation, without regulation, for the financial institutions who modify loans.

                                                            Under the guidelines for the loan modification program, lenders are being offered taxpayer incentives (money) to modify loans. These cash incentives provide a huge Boom to the mortgage lending business, but unfortunately for taxpayers, some crucial regulations are missing. Does this sound familiar?

                                                            One immediate loophole that needs to be closed is the issue of how the borrower will qualify for their new, reduced loan. The Obama plan gives lenders incentives (ie: taxpayer money) to bring a borrower’s monthly payments down to 31 percent of their gross income. However, the plan totally ignores the amount of other debt that the borrower can have.

                                                            Why is a borrower’s debt important? If a homeowner has excessive credit cards, car notes, college loans or other debt, with substantial monthly payments, they may not be able to afford even 31 percent of their income for a modified mortgage payment. Under the present program guidelines, lender’s would be still be paid to modify a loans for borrower’s who would not qualify for a loan, if their debt was considered.

                                                            In order for the Obama housing plan to work, changes must be made. If not, taxpayers should expect another fiasco, like the ones we a discovered after AIG, Goldman Sachs and the automakers used their taxpayer bailout money for bonuses, trips, jets and office remodeling.

                                                            To date, over 50 percent of all modified loans have fallen back into default and the foreclosed homes are showing up on the market. Before the taxpayer’s pay out billions of dollars to unregulated lenders, as an “incentive” to modify loans to keep people in their homes, let’s make darn sure the borrower doesn’t have so much debt that they can’t repay their loan, again. After all, how much debt a borrower has is a standard measure used to qualify for a typical loan. Why is the borrower’s debt ratio being overlooked, when taxpayer’s are on the hook?

                                                            If you agree, write to your congressional representative. There is still time to “modify” our guidelines for lenders. Hopefully, with a little public outcry, this loophole will be eliminated before we hear that billions have been paid for modified loans that fall back into default in record time.

                                                            Thank you for visiting InfoTube, a FREE home listing website for everyone. Please feel free to search our database for thousand’s of great deals on real estate.

                                                            {"commentId":6018081,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tommi-1"}
                                                            • 1 vote
                                                            Reply#19 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:08 PM EDT
                                                            {"commentId":6065671,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                                            Interesting take on the Obama housing plan. I think there was a worry that lenders wouldn't refinance without an incentive.

                                                            {"commentId":6065671,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                                              #19.1 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:02 PM EDT
                                                              Reply
                                                              {"commentId":6019110,"authorDomain":"carla-bolin"}

                                                              Who can protect the American people against the Chris Dodd political maneuvering? We are so angry.

                                                              {"commentId":6019110,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"carla-bolin"}
                                                              • 2 votes
                                                              Reply#20 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:47 PM EDT
                                                              {"commentId":6037924,"authorDomain":"tad-davis"}

                                                              I think Dodd, in the words of Ricky Ricardo, has some serious splainin' to do.

                                                              Chuck -

                                                              Do you think Dodd, even in the blue CT, can survive next year? Seems to me this one is now the Democrat's most vulnerable seat.

                                                              {"commentId":6037924,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tad-davis"}
                                                              • 3 votes
                                                              #20.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:19 PM EDT
                                                              {"commentId":6049707,"authorDomain":"hilary-and-maia"}

                                                              Tad--I, too, would be interested to hear Chuck's take.

                                                              I'm just one data point from CT, but I can tell you that Dodd currently looks to be in serious trouble. The election is a ways off, obviously, and you don't know what will happen between now and then. But I've heard a lot of people talking about Dodd recently, and not in a nice way....more in a Joe Lieberman, "can't wait to go vote him out" type of way. Even speaking for myself, as a Democrat, if the election were held tomorrow, I honestly can't tell you what I'd do.

                                                              A great deal depends on who the GOP runs, i expect...if they do the savvy thing and pick somebody who is at least vaguely palatable to Dems like myself, well...that may spell trouble. If they pick a hardcore party line type, though, Dodd maybe could squeak through. Remember, this is Weicker country.

                                                              {"commentId":6049707,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"hilary-and-maia"}
                                                              • 1 vote
                                                              #20.2 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:31 PM EDT
                                                              {"commentId":6050638,"authorDomain":"lino2008"}

                                                              Obama's biggest problem is not with Republicans, but with Clowns in his own party like Dodd, Pelosi, Rangel and Reid... They should be replaced soon for the good of our President and our Country

                                                              {"commentId":6050638,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"lino2008"}
                                                              • 2 votes
                                                              #20.3 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:52 AM EDT
                                                              {"commentId":6065763,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                                              I think Dodd's in serious political trouble; in fact, right now, if you told me there was a quiet movement inside the Democratic Party to convince him to retire rather than risk the seat going Republican, it wouldn't surprise me. I don't think the party is there yet on Dodd, he has too many friends who will work hard for him. I do think he's VERY vulnerable; after all, when the recession officially began (Dec. 07) and arguably when the banks were starting to show signs of stress, where was the chairman of the Senate Banking Cmte? He had moved to Iowa, enrolled his kids in school there; anyway, it's just one of the easy ways in a 30-second ad the Republicans are going to be able to put together to make the case that Dodd isn't looking out for folks in Connecticut. He's gone Washington... anyway, the political death by 30-second ad for Dodd is potentially too easy to envision.

                                                              {"commentId":6065763,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                                              • 2 votes
                                                              #20.4 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:06 PM EDT
                                                              {"commentId":6114402,"authorDomain":"matthew-reynolds"}

                                                              Hello Mr. Todd,

                                                              Will you please ask the President, "When will the program be put into place that will allow the average citizen the ability to serve our Country?" I was not called up to serve during Viet Nam because the draft ended and now that I am 55 I am too far beyond the age and weight that the military prefers. I am sure that there are many Americans that are anxious to "enlist" to help the United States and or the planet become a better place.

                                                              {"commentId":6114402,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"matthew-reynolds"}
                                                              • 1 vote
                                                              #20.5 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:56 PM EDT
                                                              {"commentId":6159816,"authorDomain":"infospider1957"}

                                                              Sure there are lots of people who want to join the military and serve their country. but when they get out they have almost no skills that will get them a civilian job and if they need any medical care for injuries or illnesses received during their service they won't get it. This was old news in the 80s yet every President and even McCain in his run for the Presidency was shocked to hear that veteran medical care was understaffed, underfunded and so near malpractice that they even made a movie about it called Article 99.

                                                              So ask the President when he will recognize that people who join the military and have legitimate medical claims need the same level of care that regular people get? Also ask him about when he is going to reform the health care and retirement system that congress has (yes the one everyone calls the Golden Parachute!)?

                                                              {"commentId":6159816,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"infospider1957"}
                                                                #20.6 - Wed Mar 25, 2009 8:58 PM EDT
                                                                Reply
                                                                {"commentId":6024114,"authorDomain":"te2bmason"}

                                                                I am intrigued at the President's need to tackle everyting at once. The ability to set priorities and focus on key outcomes is well documented as a critical leadership skill. Too much work in progress has been shown to result in either lower value or increased cycle time. See works by Hopp and Spearman (Northwestern) for additional information on these concepts. The President's lack of understanding of these concepts is troubling, and quite niave. The fact that he is publicly reputing the advice of successful managers (Warren Buffet, Jack Welsh, etc) is a frightening sign of arrogence.

                                                                I think it would be very interesting to ask the President what risks he thinks he is incurring by trying to do so much, so quickly and what actions is he taking to mitigate those risks.

                                                                {"commentId":6024114,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"te2bmason"}
                                                                  Reply#21 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:09 PM EDT
                                                                  {"commentId":6032625,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                                                                  Theresa,

                                                                  That is the danger of hiring someone with no management experience. The problem is compounded by the staff he has assembled. They are more suited to run a political campaign than the executive branch of the government. As long as he keeps them they will campaign rather than govern and when they can't get what they want they will turn to Chicago mafia style politics. Arrogance is the trade mark of limousine liberals and when you throw in the college professor sense of superiority you have a dangerous mix. They are so much smarter than the rest of us who are clinging to our "guns and religion" that we should just give in to their superior intellect and let them run our lives. How could someone so young and brilliant possibly ask for advice from old coots like Jack Welch or Warren Buffet?

                                                                  {"commentId":6032625,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  #21.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:52 AM EDT
                                                                  {"commentId":6040485,"authorDomain":"ProfessorLee"}

                                                                  I would say that Obama has a decent amount of experience running a large organization. Did you see his campaign organization at all? The president knows that if these things are to happen they have to happen at the beginning of his presidency. If you wait, the political will may wayne under the organized opponents of the president's platform agenda. Also, the President has enormous resources that may be set to work on making the platform reality. It is a matter of delegation...Thatis..what managers are there for.

                                                                  {"commentId":6040485,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ProfessorLee"}
                                                                  • 3 votes
                                                                  #21.2 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:43 PM EDT
                                                                  {"commentId":6042725,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                                                                  Joshua,

                                                                  I agree with the political will part but the way to maintain good will is to do the initial things right. You only have to rush if you are not confident that what you are doing will work. I don't think the president managed his campaign. He let the pros take care of it. My concern is that he has those campaign managers trying to run the government and it is whole different animal. Doing things like attacking Rush Limbaugh is a campaign tactic that does nothing to help the president or the country in fact, it diminishes the integrity of the office of the president. Who gives a rosy red rats rump what Rush thinks? Their goal was to create hatred for Republicans. Why? The campaign is over. Stop trying to divide us and start governing. That is the best way to maintain political will.

                                                                  {"commentId":6042725,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                                                                    #21.3 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:03 PM EDT
                                                                    {"commentId":6044301,"authorDomain":"ProfessorLee"}

                                                                    Perhaps. But our government IS political. Sometimes you play politicl hardball to get things done. We all know this. Rush was intended as a distraction that would divert attention from constituencies opposing Obama's platform, therebye fascilitating passage of his legislation. Hardball. Period.

                                                                    Obama didn't manage his campaign. He delegated that job to people who know how to get that job done. Delegation IS the trait of a manager. Obama can delegate well by choosing capable people. For the most part Obama has picked a capable cabinet, at least within the confines of political possibilities.

                                                                    {"commentId":6044301,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ProfessorLee"}
                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    #21.4 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:13 PM EDT
                                                                    {"commentId":6046230,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                                                                    I understand delegation. Do it on a daily basis. You still need to have breadth of knowledge about the tasks you delegate and delegate to people who have depth in specific areas. You are apparently more comfortable than I with an administration that is at war with a significant segment of the population and will use any tactic to ram through its policies. Haste may be necessary in an emergency but is a lousy way to implement effective long term change. When change is crammed down people's throats they tend to rebel and once they have established their position based on a defensive reaction it is hard to move them off of it. If the president has good ideas he should be able to sell them to the people. If, on the other hand, he believes he only won because there was a window of opportunity created by the incompetence of his opponent and environmental factors like the economy then cramming his ideas down our throats is probably his best option. I would just like to remind him he is president of the United States not president of Chicago.

                                                                    {"commentId":6046230,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                                                                      #21.5 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:52 PM EDT
                                                                      {"commentId":6050541,"authorDomain":"bigpaws12"}

                                                                      I know that the Republicans said "oh yeah, Change! Hypocrit! He's got Clinton's old Cabinet!" but really, my life was GRAND under Clinton, economically, socially, and internationally improved, so he's got lots of experienced people who've already done this right once on their feet and ready to do it again. For that I have to applaud him. Even my hard-right Retired Army conservative Republican husband is admiring his appointments, delegation ability and the items he's covered so far. Come to think of it, me too. So he's not doing it all himself, he's doing what he's supposed to do as a Commander.

                                                                      {"commentId":6050541,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"bigpaws12"}
                                                                      • 2 votes
                                                                      #21.6 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:41 AM EDT
                                                                      {"commentId":6060264,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                                                                      So you like tax cheats (seems like everyone), pardon pimps (Holder)and weasels (all of the presidents Chicago friends). I think we can do better and I think the president can too. It was entrepreneurs like Bill Gates who created jobs in the 90's as it always has been. Your boy Willie the weasel just took credit for everything and responsibility for nothing.

                                                                      I would like to see the president do well but I want him to do it in an open and honest fashion as he promised. The question is, does he want effective, lasting, positive change or does he want to cram it down our throats Chicago style? If it's Chicago style, the chaos will be much more costly than any delays associated with doing it right.

                                                                      {"commentId":6060264,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                      #21.7 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 2:09 PM EDT
                                                                      {"commentId":6065852,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                                                      I'm impressed by this thread... it's a good debate. I like the question idea... Because obviously the president has made the decision to do multiple things at once, so the question is, ok, Mr. President, you've weighed the risks, tell us? Of course, I worry his answer would be, "the risk is not doing any of these things, etc..." we might not get the answer we want.

                                                                      {"commentId":6065852,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                      #21.8 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:11 PM EDT
                                                                      {"commentId":6127865,"authorDomain":"camry2413"}

                                                                      apart from asking for advice(excuse me ,i am not too sure who and what role warren and welch play),here's something i'd like to say

                                                                      i voted for obama,for change,i did not canvass for him....i have seen his many post election tv appearances but after watchibg 60 minutes a few days back i was seriously troubled about my decision...his chuckling did not in any way reassure me...what plans does he have for the rising unemployment and unemployed..i am not worried about aig and afghanistan(maybe its my ignorance about their role in my daily life that makes it so)

                                                                      what SPECIFIC plans does obama have for the economy(no long words and financial terms in your answer please)

                                                                      {"commentId":6127865,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"camry2413"}
                                                                        #21.9 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:53 PM EDT
                                                                        {"commentId":6138350,"authorDomain":"speedygonzolette"}

                                                                        Thankfully, President Obama doesn't think access to healthcare for everyone should wait. He has an entire division of professionals who work solely on issues of health and human services. Should they sit idle while he focuses on the economy? He has surrounded himself with an immediate staff who have their jobs because they are very dedicated, capable and hard working -- not because he is beholden to some political favors.

                                                                        Just because our Congress can't keep their eye on the ball, doesn't mean President Obama should be so easily distracted and limited. We know that members of Congress have the very best health insurance -- as do those who are the harshest critics of any focus on healthcare at the moment. It takes a lot of nerve to tell others who have poor health insurance or no health insurance that they or their spouse/child/parent/sibling who has been diagnosed with a life-threatening illness should wait.

                                                                        {"commentId":6138350,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"speedygonzolette"}
                                                                          #21.10 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 7:59 PM EDT
                                                                          Reply
                                                                          {"commentId":6025743,"authorDomain":"gwangigrant"}

                                                                          Chuck, I have a feeling you are gonna be swamped with comments here this week, so I am gonna keep mine short and sincere. Last night I watched some news coverage on another station and they were actually playing the pitchfork scene with Stewart as part of their hard news coverage.All of this is absolutely toxic to our country. The pitchfork, Grassley's suicide comments, the hysteria, the clips of congressional reps swearing

                                                                          {"commentId":6025743,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"gwangigrant"}
                                                                          • 2 votes
                                                                          Reply#22 - Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:57 PM EDT
                                                                          {"commentId":6065876,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                                                          I agree... we all need to take a deep breath... yes, the public's angry but the idea, for instance, of publicizing the names of the bonus recipients of AIG seems nuts.

                                                                          {"commentId":6065876,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                          #22.1 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:12 PM EDT
                                                                          {"commentId":6107069,"authorDomain":"thefalcon2008"}

                                                                          "names of the bonus recipients of AIG seems nuts"

                                                                          On that comment I have to disagree with you Chuck.

                                                                          Do you NOT read the news stories about (using Scalia's term for us) Joe six pack being made to ware a dress or some other such embarrassing punishment from a court of law? And why is it that contracts are suddenly unbreakable? They break the most basic contract of all using law enforcement and the courts; sex for money. A willing seller and a willing buyer with an agreed upon price; sounds like a contract to me.

                                                                          That has become not a civil matter but criminal in nature; just for making an offer gets you arrested! How can anybody claim this larceny (congress AND AIG) is off limits?

                                                                          Both congress and the media have to get it; we are not as dumb of they would like us to be.

                                                                          {"commentId":6107069,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"thefalcon2008"}
                                                                            #22.2 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:25 PM EDT
                                                                            Reply
                                                                            {"commentId":6030027,"authorDomain":"arvid0823-1"}

                                                                            How (or can) Obama get a handle on the careening TARP/bonuses (AIG/Merrill/Goldman) issue. The bonuses indicate payment for non performance and point ominously to how these "whiz kids" are likely to squander their full bailout dollars (ie how well will AIG steward the $170 Billion they have recd)

                                                                            It is sounding more and more as if no one knows how the sausage is getting made (Dodd saying his amendments get dropped; Wyden /(Snowe) says his amendment was dropped between the Senate bailout bill and the joint Conf bailout bill, and no one knows who did it). More and more it seems like Summers should be the face guy and Geithner should be in the back room. The most critical dept (Treasury) is not fully staffed.

                                                                            Do the House and Senate Banking committees and/or Treasury have enough will and brainpower to run the show?

                                                                            Who is really exposed now -- Dodd, Geithner, other? Might Elizabeth Warren get a more vigorous role than that of auditor/compliance officer?

                                                                            {"commentId":6030027,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"arvid0823-1"}
                                                                            • 1 vote
                                                                            Reply#23 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:37 AM EDT
                                                                            {"commentId":6066019,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                                                            Here's issue one: the use of the word "bonus"; it's standard practice on Wall Street because paying via bonuses allows Wall Street folks to get around some tax issues. So Congress ought to work on the overall compensation issue on Wall Street if the bonus issue is truly a problem for their constituents.

                                                                            Issue 2: AIG is costing the gov't $180 billion; the dept. of Homeland Security has an annual budget of approx. $50 billion and yet the other day Robert Gibbs could NOT tell who is the person in the gov't with oversight over the AIG bailout. There should be an AIG Czar or a Secretary of AIG...

                                                                            Issue 3: Get Treasury staffed ASAP... just flood the zone with nominees... ask Congress for special exemptions to get some of the folks working; maybe ask for a temporary worker waiver or something; Just make the effort that you want to bring in 50 new folks or something dramatic like that.

                                                                            Issue 4: Call for a special commission to investigate how we got into this mess... an Iraq Study Group-like deal perhaps? Find two respected pols to head it up who don't have major ties to the financial world, maybe retired senators (Talent of Missouri; Graham of Florida; Rudman of New Hampshire; DeWine of Ohio, Robb of Virginia?)

                                                                            So they need to come up with some sort of battle plan that gives the public confidence wheels are in motion.

                                                                            {"commentId":6066019,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                                                            • 5 votes
                                                                            #23.1 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:19 PM EDT
                                                                            Reply
                                                                            {"commentId":6034022,"authorDomain":"DrRob2007"}

                                                                            Dear Chuck, I met you in Colorado at the DNC, I have a scandal bigger than the Bernie Madoff scandal, in the trillions of dollars, the elderly are being stripped of all their assets by a legal system that was supposed to protect them, Robert Sarhan, MD 305-338-6160

                                                                            THE NATIONAL ELDER ABUSE AND GUARDIANSHIP
                                                                            VICTIMS TASKFORCE FOR CHANGE

                                                                            Robert Sarhan, MD

                                                                            22795 S.W. 212 Ave

                                                                            Miami, Fl 33170

                                                                            Tel.No. 305-338-6160

                                                                            Bonnie Reiter

                                                                            809 Par Circle

                                                                            DelrayBeach,Fl 33445

                                                                            Tel.No 561-502-4700

                                                                            Dear ACLU,

                                                                            We believe that the State of Florida is a government body which is illegally stripping the civil rights of a specific group of people, mainly the elderly, who may also have some physical disabilities. This should fall under The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

                                                                            The courts are forcing the elderly into an Emergency Temporary Guardianship (ETG), labeling these persons Alleged Incapacitated Person (AIP) under the guise of providing ‘assistance.’ These same courts never verify the allegations of imminent danger, who made the allegations, and why the allegations were made to the courts. Instead, the courts routinely strip the civil rights away from elders who have property, assets and income, and remand the same elders into a forced guardianship against their will. Subsequently “professional guardians” are in a position to steal assets under the guise of professional guardianship fees, with no monitoring or oversight, and are forcing these same elderly people to pay for the legal fees generated by the guardians to pay the lawyers who represent these guardians. This outrageous guardianship scheme is out of control. It is kidnapping and the carnage is not just financial: it is emotional abuse and at times results in wrongful or premature death.

                                                                            It is those elders who have assets who are being denied their civil rights at the hands of a three-person panel, appointed by the courts. This panel consists of a psychiatrist, psychologist, and a lay person. These people are from a small pool, at the discretion of Judges, with no monitoring or oversight. Normal procedures which strip a person of his/her civil rights would require a court to involve a jury of people that are unbiased. The courts are therefore violating the elder’s 7th Amendment right to a trial by jury. The probate courts have substituted this constitutional right and have replaced it with a pool of people who are chosen by a judge. These judges then routinely use the same people over and over again. The fees generated by the court-appointed guardians and their attorneys are paid out of the ward’s assets, another violation of a civil right. The loss of the right to control your assets is the first major civil right that is violated by the court.

                                                                            In Palm Beach County, a court-ordered psychiatrist and a psychologist are paid 300 dollars to visit an elder person for 15 minutes. No witnesses are allowed at this interview. The lay person is paid 75 dollars for their 15 minute interview. All fees are paid by the AIP. No notes, no recording, no stenographer are required to substantiate their findings. This is a clear violation of our 14th Amendment which is the Constitutional Rights of Due Process.
                                                                            Their right to counsel is severed in the ETG stage, denying their right to private counsel and funds for such counsel to protect their own rights. On the simple report made by each of these three people, the elderly are routinely forced into guardianship, which strips them of all their civil rights. They are no longer allowed to make decisions concerning their own medical, housing, family, social, financial, and legal wishes. When family or friends of the adjudicated incapacitated person (AIP) attempt to stop this illegal act, they are shut down and shut out of the legal process, often being told they have no legal standing. Now even family and friends lose their civil rights to address the court. The AIP is told they cannot have their own counsel, but is forced to use the court’s counsel.

                                                                            Court-appointed lawyers are often picked by their favorite judges to take cases, while at the same time having relationships which are adverse in nature to the wards. For example, a lawyer can be appointed to represent a ward they do not know, while at the same time representing the guardian in other cases, who are adverse to the AIP, which are a conflict of interest and a violation of due process. This conflict of interest is rampant in guardianship cases. Lawyers who deal with guardianship issues have dealings with various professional associations. This incestuous behavior is being encouraged and allowed by the courts, which ultimately is a violation of the 14th Amendment of due process and the 6th Amendment, a right to counsel.

                                                                            Many guardianship’s begin during a process called Emergency Temporary Guardianship.
                                                                            This happens when someone, anyone, comes to the court and makes accusations that some elderly person is in imminent danger. No attempt is made by the court to verify in any way that these allegations are true. ETG should be illegal for they are the number one reason why the elderly are rendered with no civil rights. ETG strips civil rights away without due process, which leaves the elderly without the assurance of legal counsel.

                                                                            Very often elderly people have proper documentation and pre-need directives but the courts routinely ignore or refuse to admit these documents.

                                                                            The Courts are violating the following Elder’s Constitutional Rights:

                                                                            The 1st Amendment Right to Freedom of Religion, of Speech, of the Press, to Petition

                                                                            and to Assemble:

                                                                            The Constitutional Right to Freedom of Religion is being abused by the Courts in forced guardianship cases, as the guardians prevent the elderly from practicing their respected religion in their chosen houses of worship (Synagogue, Churches, Mosque, etc.), a violation of the Florida Statute 744.3215. The elderly are also denied the right to socialize and to congregate with their family and friends. The Courts have denied the elder’s Rights of Freedom of Speech while in the majority cases the elderly people are kept out of the courtrooms by the Guardians, denying their Right to Counsel and denying their Rights to the Courts. In the majority of these guardianship cases, the court-appointed counsel has represented the guardian previously or works together and is only their representing the Ward to ensure he/she does not have legitimate counsel that will fight for her freedom.

                                                                            The 4th Amendment Right to Unreasonable Search and Seizures

                                                                            The 4th Amendment of the United States Constitution gives Americans, including the elderly people, the Right to Privacy in their own homes. Guardians violate this Constitutional Right by seizing elders’ assets, selling their personal property, their homes, their jewelry, etc. If the elder has a large sum of money, the guardian will force the elder, against his/her will, to have a stranger or an ‘aide’ live in their home, charging them well over one hundred thousand dollars per year, instead of allowing a family member to care for the elderly for free. In many cases these strangers steal many belongings from the elderly. The elderly have no rights to the Courts, so they are powerless to do anything.

                                                                            The 5th and 14th Amendment The Right of Due Process

                                                                            The Courts violate the Elder Rights of Due Process. In over 97 % of these cases, the Courts are ordering these elderly people into forced guardianship against their will, when these people are fully competent to determine who they wish to care for them. In 1989 the Associated Press did a study of 2200 guardianship cases with the American Bar Association in which they clearly stated that these elderly people were very competent to determine who they wanted as guardians, which normally was a family member, but were denied by the courts. The Court appointed attorneys are not representing their clients, but taking these cases to ensure that these elderly people are remanded into the guardianship cases to be stripped of all their assets. In over a five year study of these guardianship cases, the court appointed attorney had a conflict of interest and should not have taken the guardianship case to represent the ward or the guardian. (For example, the attorney is representing the guardian in one case and at the same time he is also representing the ward in another case, who is adverse to that same guardian, which is a conflict of interest and a violation of the Florida Rules Regulating the Florida Bar 4-1.7.) This is a common practice which taints the entire capacity proceedings in favor of the Guardians and Attorneys to strip the elderly of all their assets.

                                                                            The 6th Amendment The Right Counsel

                                                                            The elderly are being forced to use court-appointed attorneys. The elder is then ruled incapacitated, stripped of all civil rights and denied the right to hire his/her own attorney. The elder is rendered helpless, with no attorney to speak for them. Congressman Claude Pepper stated: “It is a National Disgrace…that once you’re in a guardianship, it is almost impossible to get them out.”

                                                                            The 7th Amendment The Right to a Jury

                                                                            Since 1982 the guardianship program has failed horribly, destroying lives in the process.
                                                                            In thousands of guardianship cases few, if any, elderly people were ever afforded a right to a trial by jury. The court-appointed attorney never informs the elderly person of his/her right to a jury trial.

                                                                            The main power point: Judges are allowing hearings via their "roll call" and exparte petitions which set in motion the ability of probate judges to rule immediately or set a 5 minute hearing whereby the petitioner asks for a person of "age" to be placed into an ETG, thereby remanding the elder to be classified legally an AIP. These hearings are done without the potential "ward" ever being notified legally, therefore NO due process. The potential ward is being placed into the AIP status rendering them with fewer rights than felons on death row. They are stripped of their rights BEFORE they even have an appearance before the court. This unconstitutional act by the judges must be abolished immediately. Once the rights have been stripped, the "ward" is subjected to medical interviews, ordered by the court using tainted court "pools" of so called professionals. These unannounced interviews are NOT being monitored or acknowledged to the Apathies report is then used against the AIP to adjudicate their "incapacitated" status at another 5 minute hearing where again the AIP is almost NEVER allowed to attend and the process is facilitated by the complicit consent of the "court appointed" attorney ad item who is not truly representing the wishes of the ward.

                                                                            In conclusion, this is the GREATEST SINGLE ABUSE OF CIVIL RIGHTS which

                                                                            has affected our Parent’s generation, but will affect all generations to come. This statute is

                                                                            Unconstitutional and has already destroyed many elderly lives and their families. Please allow

                                                                            us to present our case to you, please, before my mother dies and becomes another

                                                                            victim of premature death by chemical poisoning. We all believe in CHANGE but I need your

                                                                            Help, please meet with us A.S.A.P. Robert Sarhan, M.D. 305-338-6160

                                                                            THE ENTIRE PROCESS FROM START TO FINISH IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

                                                                            LINKS:

                                                                            1. The name assigned to the document by the author. This field may also contain sub-titles, series names, and report numbers.Abuses in Guardianship of the Elderly and Infirm: A National Disgrace. A Report by the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Health and Long-Term Care of the Select Committee on Aging. House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, First Session.

                                                                            2. The Elderly in Guardianship: A Crisis of Constitutional Proportions - Mark D. Andrews. The guardianship system is in a state of crisis as it continues to ...
                                                                            - 10k

                                                                            3. Stolen Lives Thousands of older Americans are being robbed of their freedom, dignity, and life savings by a legal system created for their protection. ...

                                                                            4. The Gulag of Guardianship The legal system that is supposed to protect our frail elderly is a national disgrace. All too often it strips them of their rights and leaves them open to financial abuse.

                                                                            5. ESTATE OF DENIAL

                                                                            6. Associated Press 1987, Guardianships in America, A National Disgrace

                                                                            7. National Association to stop guardian abuse

                                                                            8. National association to stop elderly abuse and exploitation

                                                                            THANK YOU,

                                                                            ROBERT SARHAN, MD AND BONNIE REITER

                                                                            {"commentId":6034022,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"DrRob2007"}
                                                                            • 7 votes
                                                                            Reply#24 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:44 AM EDT
                                                                            {"commentId":6037758,"authorDomain":"syncbox2"}

                                                                            If Chuck Todd doesn't follow up, why not contact Anderson Cooper under his "Keeping them Honest" segment? Guardianship like this is often abused. I know a guy who, when a minor, had a "guardian" controlling the considerable assets of himself and brother. That guy transferred valuable stock (PG&E, etc) into his OWN name where it still exists. The guardian died and I guess his family found themselves lucky beneficiaries.

                                                                            That the state of Florida is aiding and abetting such activities doesn't surprise me at all.

                                                                            {"commentId":6037758,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"syncbox2"}
                                                                              #24.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:12 PM EDT
                                                                              {"commentId":6089566,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                                                              I plan to take a closer look at this issue; the state of Florida has a lot of aggressive laws when it comes to the elderly and Medicaid for instance; I know this from my own personal experience; So it's worth taking time with this story.

                                                                              {"commentId":6089566,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                                                              • 3 votes
                                                                              #24.2 - Sun Mar 22, 2009 12:44 PM EDT
                                                                              {"commentId":6093674,"authorDomain":"delisafos"}

                                                                              Please, Chuck, what have they been stripped of, exactly? Or are we misinterpreting the Constitution, again?

                                                                              {"commentId":6093674,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"delisafos"}
                                                                                #24.3 - Sun Mar 22, 2009 5:54 PM EDT
                                                                                {"commentId":6115355,"authorDomain":"darrelljyc"}

                                                                                This is very true, I know someone that this happened too.My friend would not go to the store for her mom some cigarette's,so her mom called and reported that she was being abused.They just came and took her mom away and seized all her assets.They took her home, cars and money.They placed her in a nursing home,she called my friend and said that she was sorry and wanted to come home but It was to late.She died in that place not long after that.I believed she died from neglect and a broken heart.I'm a CNA and I know first hand that a lot of these places are horrible.I'm only one person but I do what I can to make their lives in there as good as I can.I wish I could do more ,but I always get fired for stepping up to the people in this nursing homes who are more powerful then me.

                                                                                {"commentId":6115355,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"darrelljyc"}
                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                #24.4 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:38 PM EDT
                                                                                Reply
                                                                                {"commentId":6035482,"authorDomain":"chucktodd"}

                                                                                Ok, folks, here's a challenge/idea for you, I'd like question ideas from you for the president next Tuesday night... But I don't necessarily want the question ideas DIRECTLY from you, I want to hear what your neighbors and less politics-obsessed friends and family want asked... So shoot 'em to me via Newsvine here... I know every reporter claims they are listening to you and I'm not going to promise that I'm going to use a direct question but I do view these prime time press conferences as vehicles for the public. There are pressing issues to ask the president about and I have plenty of ideas on how to make news on some things but I also want to know what specific asks you have of him on the economy, in particular...

                                                                                anyway, fire away...

                                                                                {"commentId":6035482,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"chucktodd"}
                                                                                • 3 votes
                                                                                Reply#25 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:43 PM EDT
                                                                                {"commentId":6037163,"authorDomain":"brickerduo"}

                                                                                Thanks for asking Chuck.

                                                                                I would like to know:

                                                                                How will the White House deal with the Blue Dog Democrats who do not cooperate with the President in terms of reaching the goals he (Obama) campaigned on?

                                                                                When will Habeas Corpus be reinstated?

                                                                                If Bush 43 did authorize torture and was convicted, would President Obama pardon Bush?

                                                                                {"commentId":6037163,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"brickerduo"}
                                                                                • 5 votes
                                                                                #25.1 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 1:52 PM EDT
                                                                                {"commentId":6037736,"authorDomain":"annep"}

                                                                                Mr. President,

                                                                                What is your plan for capturing Osama Bin Laden?

                                                                                 

                                                                                {"commentId":6037736,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"annep"}
                                                                                • 5 votes
                                                                                #25.2 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:12 PM EDT
                                                                                {"commentId":6039117,"authorDomain":"towkthi"}

                                                                                Mr. Todd,

                                                                                "Enforcing contracts" is universally accepted as one of the tenets that determines a country's business viability. Disregarding the constitutional problems with punitive taxes, what kind of message would the breaking of AIG employees contracts send to those interested in doing business in the US, domestic and foreign? Furthermore, on a macro scale how does recouping 165 million dollars actually benefit the economy?

                                                                                {"commentId":6039117,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"towkthi"}
                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                #25.3 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:02 PM EDT
                                                                                {"commentId":6040025,"authorDomain":"jphiliferg"}

                                                                                I'd like to know how he is able to tolerate you guys in the press making comments about issues you clearly don't know anything about. Especially people on 1600 Pennsylvania avenue and Pat Robertson. It's really a joke.

                                                                                {"commentId":6040025,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"jphiliferg"}
                                                                                  #25.4 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:29 PM EDT
                                                                                  {"commentId":6040218,"authorDomain":"mrtorpedoman"}

                                                                                  Please explain "toxic" assets in the following context by contrasting the following to the current housing crisis:
                                                                                  If I buy a new $10,000.00 auto with 10% down and financing at 6% APR for 60 months and I drive off the lot.....6 months later the open retail market on THAT used car is now $7900.00. Is that asset now TOXIC? Does that asset become more toxic as time passes even though I am reducing the principle? Shouldn't the focus be on keeping people in their homes and not worrying about the perceived value of homes? Why should the government establish a "bad bank" to buy up the banks' mistakes? Why can't we compell them to restructure loans by lowering interest rates and/or extending loan terms to 50 years until the market recovers?

                                                                                  {"commentId":6040218,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"mrtorpedoman"}
                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                  #25.5 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:35 PM EDT
                                                                                  {"commentId":6040231,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                                                                                  Mr. President,

                                                                                  You say you are not going to raise taxes on the middle class but cap and trade has the potential to be one of the most pervasive taxes in history affecting the cost of nearly everything we buy. If your cap and trade law is passed how much will it raise the cost of living for average Americans and how will it affect the competitiveness of our businesses?

                                                                                  Mr. President,

                                                                                  Housing prices were inflated to unsustainable levels by speculation. Why not let them drop to true market value rather than create artificial support for the inflated prices with the homeowner bailout program? It looks like lower prices and low interest are starting to have a positive effect.

                                                                                  Mr. President,

                                                                                  Why do we have to rush through legislation without reading it? Isn't it more important to get it right than to get it fast? You're driving a ship not a jet ski.

                                                                                  Thanks for asking Chuck. Good luck.

                                                                                  {"commentId":6040231,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                  #25.6 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:35 PM EDT
                                                                                  {"commentId":6041006,"authorDomain":"sonomofo"}

                                                                                  What structural changes do you think are needed in the banking/financial system?

                                                                                  In 5 years time how is it going to be different from how it has been over the last dozen years?

                                                                                  What are you going to do to bring about these changes?

                                                                                  {"commentId":6041006,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"sonomofo"}
                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                  #25.7 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:59 PM EDT
                                                                                  {"commentId":6041807,"authorDomain":"kellers"}

                                                                                  During your campaign you voiced your plan to take care of our veterans. Last night on Nightly News they announced your proposal to have private insurance take care of their medical needs to save the government money. Please tell me there is another side to this story.

                                                                                  {"commentId":6041807,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"kellers"}
                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                  #25.8 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:26 PM EDT
                                                                                  {"commentId":6045402,"authorDomain":"ubermuse"}

                                                                                  Who killed a provision in the stimulus package that would have curtailed bonuses at bailed out companies? Even Sen. Ron Wyden, co-sponsor of the eliminated provision has "no idea" who killed it! Transparency, please!

                                                                                  {"commentId":6045402,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ubermuse"}
                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                  #25.9 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:09 PM EDT
                                                                                  {"commentId":6047116,"authorDomain":"jvfry"}

                                                                                  I would like to know why insurance companys will not pay for alternative health care. We could save so much money preventing sickness than trying to cure it. I am 71 years old and I do not take any medicine. I go to a MD who trys to keep me well instead of making me sick by giving me 10 to 15 pills that have harmful side effects. Our government rewards drs who give the most pills and the most tests. I have to pay $98.00 out of my social security check and $140.00 for a supplement, and $40.00 for drug coverage which pays very little if I had to use it. Everybody always wants to help women who have babies out of wedlock and people on drug and alcohol who get free medical care, food stamps, free housing, but some old person who has worked all their life has to pay through the nose for medical care, when some of them do not draw $900.00 a month, and do not qualify for food stamps or free housing. What is wrong with this picture. I worked until last year at low paying jobs so why can't these same people work. Let them do something for their food stamps and welfare checks. I feel this would help our economy a lot.

                                                                                  {"commentId":6047116,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"jvfry"}
                                                                                    #25.10 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:48 PM EDT
                                                                                    {"commentId":6047130,"authorDomain":"xraykate43"}

                                                                                    I want to know why the US Army can send both parents of small children to war zones at the same time? My son and his wife were both going to be deployed at the same time to Iraq, not in the same unit or to the same area, leaving behind their 2 year old son. I, as his mother, had to sign and agree to a "Family Care Plan" which said that I would take responsibility for the child. While we as a family are willing to do what it takes to assist and support our soldiers in the protection of our country's rights and freedoms, this practice is appalling and many people wonder why it is allowed. I am curious as to the statistics of how many military families experience this situation. I am happy to say that in the end, my son's Iraq orders were cancelled, not because of his child, but his unit didn't have to go. My daughter - in - law served 15 months in Iraq, all of which were in Stop Loss. She was to have been released in JAn 08, went to Iraq in OCt 07, came home in Dec 08. Missed 1/2 of her little boy's life so far. What a sacrifice.

                                                                                    Please, let's stop this practice of taking both parents to a war zone at the same time...

                                                                                    {"commentId":6047130,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"xraykate43"}
                                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                                    #25.11 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:49 PM EDT
                                                                                    {"commentId":6047295,"authorDomain":"lgagroup08"}

                                                                                    Dear Mr. President,

                                                                                    While it is clear to most descerning adults in this country that wall street NEEDED this bailout to ensure a possible national recovery from thier irresponsible greed, have lawmakers considered the idea that national healthcare coverage would be a truly prudent and long lasting economic stimulus for every single person in the country? How many americans would be able to get out of debt if they werent paying rediculously overpriced medical bills and for equally ovepriced pharmaceutical cost? I hear people chanting anti-socialist reterict stating that medicaid and medicare covers the poor. I argue that they have no problem with the benefits they get from other "socialist" programs; Police forces, Fire and Rescue, Education! Mr. President it is time for common sense to overpower greed. If you want to stimulate the economy in a truly meaningful way it is time to overhaul our healthcare system. Life and good health should not go to the highest bidder that is inhumane.

                                                                                    {"commentId":6047295,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"lgagroup08"}
                                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                                    #25.12 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:59 PM EDT
                                                                                    {"commentId":6049562,"authorDomain":"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"}

                                                                                    Since President Obama has now "killed" the budget proposal for veterans to bill their private health insurance companies, and he has also explained the thought behind it, "insurance companies are gettting a free ride"...will he look at what AMVETS wanted to put in its place:

                                                                                    * Billings should be pursued more aggressively for injuries not related to service. A 2008 Government Accountability Office study found that about $1.7 billion in treatment that could have been charged to private insurance never was, nor was it collected by the VA.

                                                                                    AMVETS didn't get a chance to introduce their proposal on Wednesday.

                                                                                    Thank you for all of your hard work, Chuck - I'm so happy you're at the People's House!

                                                                                    {"commentId":6049562,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"}
                                                                                      #25.13 - Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:22 PM EDT
                                                                                      {"commentId":6050630,"authorDomain":"parrtway"}

                                                                                      Ok, I have one question here. Maybe two:

                                                                                      First one would probably be about the Treasury Secretary mainly. With all the news, speeches, and video, I don't really see where there is a trusted independent accounting of these institutions that are receiving tax dollars. Maybe it's assumed that an army of bookkeepers and accountants are marching into the places of business and going over things to see if they in fact, can find that the institutions really need the money. Moreover, with some of them owing back taxes, Uncle Sam can also track who owes them back now, and get some of the money back, plus interest.

                                                                                      I'm talking of a major audit here, one that say, the IRS can do in certain cases. In other words, a company wants tax dollars to bail them out. Well, company "A" has back taxes, but really needs a loan, so, we give it to them, but cut it by the amount owed us in tax plus interest, back to the Treasury. IE: I want one billion, but I owe 20 million taxes. Treasury gives them one billion minus twenty million (plus interest @ X%); So they get less than nine hundred eighty million dollars counting interest, plus they have to pay the net back plus interest at a future date. Sound fair? And is something like this already happening or going to be happening?

                                                                                      The other thing is discrepancies, If there is shady dealing or an honest mistake found by this army of tax auditors, then are they explained, cataloged, and put before someone to determine if there was any illegality to bring charges, or fines? If it was in the books already about an issue, then coming back saying "oops", would need to be clarified and accepted or rejected with a slap on the wrist. Is any of this in the works now, or in the future?

                                                                                      {"commentId":6050630,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"parrtway"}
                                                                                        #25.14 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:51 AM EDT
                                                                                        {"commentId":6054565,"authorDomain":"GinT"}

                                                                                        Fantastic idea. This is from alot of my massage therapy friends who are certainly not politically attuned. So here goes...There is an enormous number of the population that are termed the "Baby Boomers". These people have been affected by the economy the most, we feel, with everything we've worked for all of our lives gone, our homes gone, our small businesses gone, and now we need to go back to school to learn yet another career to be competitive in the "new economy" and rebuild something before we retire in the not-too-distant future. The President keeps focusing on young people, their contributions, their future, but what about us "college-bound new-economy-career Baby Boomers" that need the help funding our education? We try to apply online for scholarships and grants and are told immediately that we don't qualify due to the required age range (under 30) so how are we to pay for this new career's education when we have nothing left?

                                                                                        {"commentId":6054565,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"GinT"}
                                                                                        • 3 votes
                                                                                        #25.15 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:42 AM EDT
                                                                                        {"commentId":6054997,"authorDomain":"priceless14life"}

                                                                                        My question has to do with the Mortgage lenders/servicers that many collectively feel have created to HUGE economic empty housing crises. When mortgage lenders could have excepted properties from buyers who "were APPROVED" and buyers who "offered cash" with no qualifying needed, many lenders just said no. In talking and comparing stories, some of the $ amounts were as low as $20 to $30K short as well as at market price.(due property value dropping)We felt lenders (COUNTRYWIDE was top of list)this measure was done so that they would get INS Mortgage money to pay them the whole LOAN AMOUNT even if the value was no longer there.(just a thought) Because it made no sense to say no creating many empty houses and forclosures that DIDNOT HAVE TO HAPPEN. ? WAS PRESIDENT OBAMA AWARE OF THIS TYPE OF TATIC/PRATICE BEING DONE THAT HELPED CONTRIBUTE TO THE HOUSING CRISES? IT HAPPENED TO MANY WHO WENT INTO FORECLOSURE BECAUSE THE LENDERS "REFUSED".

                                                                                        {"commentId":6054997,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"priceless14life"}
                                                                                          #25.16 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:05 AM EDT
                                                                                          {"commentId":6057054,"authorDomain":"murraypowers"}

                                                                                          I would ask President Obama how a "two state solution" in Israel/Palestine could ever be anything but Plessy vs. Ferguson in the Middle East.

                                                                                          {"commentId":6057054,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"murraypowers"}
                                                                                            #25.17 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:41 AM EDT
                                                                                            {"commentId":6059119,"authorDomain":"rsfix-hmbiz"}

                                                                                            Chuck, this might have been asked before but I have never seen an answer. While this might sound naive I would like to know. If all those billions of dollars that were given to the auto industry and banking institutions were to be evenly divided and distributed amongst all registered tax payers of 2007 that the economy would definately be stimulated. People would use this money to pay off their debt, purchase that new car, ect., ect., ect. This money would find its way immediately back into the system, the banks, small business, auto industry and so forth. While also providing a means for those out of work and such a much needed helping hand.

                                                                                            Thank you for the opportunity to at least ask this. I would really love to know that while very simplistic on the face value of this, why it wouldn't work.

                                                                                            {"commentId":6059119,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"rsfix-hmbiz"}
                                                                                            • 3 votes
                                                                                            #25.18 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:14 PM EDT
                                                                                            {"commentId":6059511,"authorDomain":"v1king64"}

                                                                                            Chuck,

                                                                                            Here is one that should have been asked during the campaign but never was.

                                                                                            Mr. President,

                                                                                            What law is it the rewards companies for outsourcing jobs? Has it been repealed and if not why not? Democrats have had control of congress for over 2 years.

                                                                                            {"commentId":6059511,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"v1king64"}
                                                                                              #25.19 - Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:34 PM EDT
                                                                                              {"commentId":6076233,"authorDomain":"lacostanzo"}

                                                                                              Please ask the President how he plans to respond to the People's Republic of China, which is appalled at his flagrant spending package. Perhaps he will listen to his foreign investor, since he cannot seem to hear the domestic investors, the citizens of the United States to whom he was sworn to protect and serve.

                                                                                              {"commentId":6076233,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"lacostanzo"}
                                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                                              #25.20 - Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:43 PM EDT
                                                                                              {"commentId":6088645,"authorDomain":"rmh-1"}

                                                                                              I saw an article from a Washington, D.C. paper by Margaret Talev and it encouraged the average tax payer that their letters to the administration are actually received, read and responded to. With all the advice the President Obama receives from high-ranking, highly-paid officials, does he ever consider or look at the advice given by the average citizen, the one from the trenches so to speak? My daughter is both an army reservist and a government employee and in January I encouraged her to send a letter with her "money saving ideas" based on the things she witnesses day to day in these organizations. She sent President Obama a letter, VP Biden, Senator Harkin and Senator Grassley. Quite a bit of time has gone by and she's never received an acknowledgement of her letter by anyone. I looked at her letter, it wasn't complaining, it wasn't over the top, it was positive, helpful, do-able and wouldn't cost any jobs. Her money-saving ideas can only be utilized if someone at the top sees them, someone who has the power to see that average people have good solutions. Would you please ask President Obama if he would like a copy of her letter with her government money saving suggestions?

                                                                                              {"commentId":6088645,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"rmh-1"}
                                                                                                #25.21 - Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:44 AM EDT
                                                                                                {"commentId":6096534,"authorDomain":"debbylewis55"}

                                                                                                OK Here is my Question

                                                                                                I work for Postal Service (letter Carrier) the price of the stamp is going up again in May we are billions in the hole and they are harressing the HELL out of the working employees (not supervisors) for every minute we spend delievering the MAIL (example 4 minutes in the bathroom instead of 3) so on and so on.Mean while supervisors take 2 and 3 hour lunch breaks to meet someone in a MOTEL,or makeout with someone in there car in the parking lot

                                                                                                the list can go ON and ON.These are people who make $60,000.00 plus a year to answer phones and sexually harrass carriers create HOSTILE work areas and to TOP it ALL OFF the Post Master General GETS a $800,000.00 BONUS. Boy just like Wall Street CEO's.The postal service is going down the TUBES and it's just not because of the drop of mail volune but MISUSE of the POWER (Management).Hell I Can do a better job (pretty much lower the PRICE of the STAMP in 4 YEARS if given the CHANCE. So Please Ask the President to ask the Post Master general (CEO) why he gets a BONUS and his supervisors get payed real good for doing nothing .Not just my opinion and others that I work with

                                                                                                {"commentId":6096534,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"debbylewis55"}
                                                                                                  #25.22 - Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:39 PM EDT
                                                                                                  {"commentId":6103374,"authorDomain":"tomtraubertblue-01"}

                                                                                                  What is the stimulus and economic recovery plan going to do to help people like this:

                                                                                                  "Earl Richardson's medications were running out, his feet were swelling and he felt a hard bulge in his stomach.

                                                                                                  "His wife told him he couldn't wait any longer. He must see a doctor. It had been almost a year since the 56-year-old lost his tech support job after it was outsourced to India. He had gone without seeing his internist, dermatologist, dentist and optometrist for months because he could not afford costly COBRA health continuation benefits. With diabetes, high cholesterol and high blood pressure, Richardson knew the danger he faced but said times were tough."

                                                                                                  And a question for you, Chuck Todd: When are your colleagues going to stop obsessing over trivial fluff driven by Politico-Drudge and take your jobs seriously?

                                                                                                  I commend you for taking this one step in overcoming the White House press corps failures though. Let's see how you come through. Is this going to translate to what you address in your broadcasts? Or are you going with the fluff-of-the-day?

                                                                                                  {"commentId":6103374,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tomtraubertblue-01"}
                                                                                                    #25.23 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:26 PM EDT
                                                                                                    {"commentId":6107437,"authorDomain":"tedf"}

                                                                                                    Chuck,

                                                                                                    Re: Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Iraq

                                                                                                    This issue has been bugging me for a long time, and I've yet to hear any forceful response from President Obama. I fully support him, and feel like we've been granted a huge breath of fresh air. However, from what I've been reading, there is enough money being wasted right now, today - let alone what hath been wrought over the last 8 years - to put a substantial dent in the deficit were it to be stopped immediately.

                                                                                                    "Mr. President, there have been countless reports of fraud, waste and abuse in Iraq, and claims that these crimes are draining the treasury as fast as, if not faster than, some of the bailouts. When are you going to take a definitive public stand on these outrages, appoint someone that has the integrity and horsepower to investigate and expose to the light this criminal raiding of taxpayer dollars, report back to us what waste is being stopped right now, and what you intend to do to prosecute any crimes that are uncovered and recoup our wasted money?"

                                                                                                    I would suggest the Vice President, who would lend enough White House power to accomplish something fairly quickly, to lead the enquiry and demonstrate the committment required to really kick !@# and take names.

                                                                                                    We deserve, and should demand, this immediate accounting.

                                                                                                    Thanks, Chuck

                                                                                                    {"commentId":6107437,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tedf"}
                                                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                                                    #25.24 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:46 PM EDT
                                                                                                    {"commentId":6108668,"authorDomain":"susan66203"}

                                                                                                    Honestly Chuck, they don't care about the same things you news folks do. The people I know don't care about whether or not its okay for Obama to keep his sense of humor in every difficult times, whether or not Axelrod and Geithner are agruing, if Dodd or Bernanke was the one who removed the bonus restriction from the bill. The media has largely trumped up one tired imaginary fight over another because the narrative was easy to play too. Its poor journalism and frankly, Chuck, we deserve better than that. We see the same one or two headlines played OVER AND OVER AND OVER ( I LOVE Keith O but his show is based on that premise!) and we wonder who cares about us? Things go on all over the country that aren't about AIG or the octomom but we don't get to hear about it because you all are only covering the one story of the week.

                                                                                                    Okay...so the question was what we'd like to ask the president....

                                                                                                    We the people, out here in the heartland, want to know what we can do to help aid in the recovery. We've heard about the three legged stool and the big bailout and the push to get lending going. But we want to know "What can I do, here, without big bucks behind me that can help to get things done?"

                                                                                                    {"commentId":6108668,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"susan66203"}
                                                                                                    • 6 votes
                                                                                                    #25.25 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:54 PM EDT
                                                                                                    {"commentId":6113490,"authorDomain":"bischoff-jason"}

                                                                                                    I am WAY upside down on my mortgage, on a house I just bought a year and a half ago. I have never missed a payment. I have never even been late. My loan isn't owned by Freddy or Fannie. How will your plan help me?

                                                                                                    {"commentId":6113490,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"bischoff-jason"}
                                                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                                                    #25.26 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:27 PM EDT
                                                                                                    {"commentId":6113502,"authorDomain":"aweers"}

                                                                                                    Dear Mr. President,

                                                                                                    Would you be willing to work for $1 a year until you reach your goals for reducing the deficit? P.S., I don't agree with everything you've done so far, but I think you're doing a great job and I am very proud to have you as my president.

                                                                                                    {"commentId":6113502,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"aweers"}
                                                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                                                    #25.27 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:28 PM EDT
                                                                                                    {"commentId":6113527,"authorDomain":"info-473"}

                                                                                                    small businesses nead loans, not tax breaks

                                                                                                    Chuck, thanks for asking. As a small business owner who has had to lay off half the work force: Small businesses do not need tax breaks, they need loans. Any small business who is paying taxes in this environment is doing well. They are making a taxable profit in the worst economic times in nearly a century. These people do not need help. Small businesses need loans to keep the doors open until the strorm passes. We have been here for almost 40 years. Thank you.

                                                                                                    {"commentId":6113527,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"info-473"}
                                                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                                                    #25.28 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:29 PM EDT
                                                                                                    {"commentId":6113528,"authorDomain":"sue-3334"}

                                                                                                    Credit card companies charge outrageous interest rates.

                                                                                                    Reasonable, ethical interest rates would free up money to help people pay their mortgages, buy food, get health care, etc.

                                                                                                    What will you do to cap credit card interest rates?

                                                                                                    {"commentId":6113528,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"sue-3334"}
                                                                                                    • 5 votes
                                                                                                    #25.29 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:29 PM EDT
                                                                                                    {"commentId":6113529,"authorDomain":"bernice-dunn"}

                                                                                                    When you campaigned you said that you would provide students with the option to have their college tuition paid for if they committed to a certain number of years of community service. When will this be implemented and how will it be implemented? Through the Dept of Education. This would be a wonderful grant funded position funded by Perkins grants for community colleges. Or possibly you could get the Gates Foundation to fund these positions.

                                                                                                    2. Once the recession/depression is resolved, what is the plan to reduce the national debt?

                                                                                                    Thanks for asking Chuck.

                                                                                                    {"commentId":6113529,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"bernice-dunn"}
                                                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                                                    #25.30 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:29 PM EDT
                                                                                                    {"commentId":6113531,"authorDomain":"bpetterson"}

                                                                                                    Has there been any suggestion of putting the AIG bonus money in escrow accounts for the intended recipients - to start to be distributed as the economy recovers?

                                                                                                    It would help me to think that they were earning it (well, sort of) - and might give them incentive to help fix what they helped break.

                                                                                                    {"commentId":6113531,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"bpetterson"}
                                                                                                      #25.31 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:29 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113571,"authorDomain":"robertrodger"}

                                                                                                      Thank you for this opportunity, Mr. Todd. Here is a question I wish I would have been able to ask President Obama during the campaign or transition.

                                                                                                      Mr. President, presuming that more Federal spending is necessary to combat the ongoing economic crisis, would you support plans to use the Federal government’s market power place to sway policy—for instance, instead of simply bailing out a failing automotive company, pay them now for 100,000 electric cars to be delivered in 5 or 10 years, or instead of paying a failing bank directly, creating a program to repay specific loans amounts for specific individuals?

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113571,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"robertrodger"}
                                                                                                      • 2 votes
                                                                                                      #25.32 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:30 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113609,"authorDomain":"iowaboy8"}

                                                                                                      Chuck: Iowa Supreme Court is ready to decide within days if they will uphold a decision by a lower court that overturned one man- one woman marriage. It allowed my partner and I after being together 30 years to actually marry in Iowa (we had a 24hr window)... now that hinges on the Iowa Supreme Court. My Question is: President Obama, you said you would like to see DOMA (defense of marriage act) overturned. When can we expect that and are you still on to do that? If you did it would allow states that marry same sex couples to be recognized in other states. Mark Kassis, Ames, Iowa

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113609,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"iowaboy8"}
                                                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                                                      #25.33 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:31 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113626,"authorDomain":"bb933"}

                                                                                                      I don't have a question but a comment for the President.

                                                                                                      I was born in Iran, and I need to let the President know that Iranians love to haggle. Even if you give them the lowest price that they have ever seen, they would still haggle with you. Just FYI.

                                                                                                      Chuck, maybe you can turn this comment into a question.

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113626,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"bb933"}
                                                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                                                      #25.34 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:31 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113660,"authorDomain":"gotkismet"}

                                                                                                      My son has type 1 diabetes and can't afford health coverage or the durable medical equipment he needs. I help him, but there are so many who don't have someone to help. What can you do and how soon can you arrange help for those who are screened out by underwriting and have minimal financial resources? The state program under which he is covered pays only a fraction of his durable medical equipment.

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113660,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"gotkismet"}
                                                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                                                      #25.35 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:32 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113697,"authorDomain":"ljbunch"}

                                                                                                      I'm retired. My spouse will reach age 62 in January. What changes to Social Security are you intending to implement that may affect her decissions concerning retirement?

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113697,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ljbunch"}
                                                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                                                      #25.36 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:33 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113703,"authorDomain":"golfersontheroad"}

                                                                                                      Chuck: Those of us between 60 and 64 years of age who do not have employer-provided health care are denied individual health care coverage because of even a minor medical condition. If we are lucky enough to be approved because we are in absolutely perfect health, the premiums are outrageous and we cannot afford them. Our only hope is to live in perfect health until age 65 when Medicare kicks in.

                                                                                                      Why can't those of us between 60 and 64 who cannot afford to buy private health care be allowed to buy into Medicare until age 65 when we qualify because of age?

                                                                                                      Thanks for your help in taking these sort of issues directly to the President.

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113703,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"golfersontheroad"}
                                                                                                      • 3 votes
                                                                                                      #25.37 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:33 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113714,"authorDomain":"enjoysthemoment"}

                                                                                                      Mr President: Are you in agreement with the Remdition policies of former

                                                                                                      President Bush--what will you do with inmates at Bangram AFB in

                                                                                                      Afghanstan

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113714,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"enjoysthemoment"}
                                                                                                      • 2 votes
                                                                                                      #25.38 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:34 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113737,"authorDomain":"rosemaryweimer"}

                                                                                                      Hello Chuck, Thanks for this opportunity. I am a vocational rehabilitation counselor for the State of California, in Oakland CA. I support persons with disabilities to get into the work force. Due to our State budget problems we now have a mandatory two day furlough per month to save money. And I may be laid off in the new fiscal year. So myself and my colleagues are "sacrificing", granted it is a State problem.

                                                                                                      So I am wondering if Federal employees have "sacraficed" and also do Federal employees including elected officials pay a portion of their medical insurance like I do. If they don't, they could like most Americans with medical insurance and this would save money for our federal budget and would be the fair thing to do.

                                                                                                      Best to you,

                                                                                                      Rosemary Weimer

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113737,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"rosemaryweimer"}
                                                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                                                      #25.39 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:34 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113810,"authorDomain":"crimblu"}

                                                                                                      Someone needs to address the issue of usury laws. Apparently in Bush's bankruptcy laws, the maximum interest allowed was abolished. Now people are receiving notifications from their credit card companies that their interest rates are increasing from around 9% to 23.99% AND MORE! And this increase is not based on default or late payments, but on the "chance" that these cardholders MIGHT default. This should be illegal. What can the President do about this?

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113810,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"crimblu"}
                                                                                                      • 3 votes
                                                                                                      #25.40 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:36 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113813,"authorDomain":"jopflynn"}

                                                                                                      I am Native American, so here is a question that has zero chance of getting asked. What would you do if there were a country with a dictator who received billions in economic aid due to treaty obligations? Had corrupt gambling operations which raked in billions more. And they had no transparency in government and no freedom of the press?

                                                                                                      It would be front page news in this economic crisis. The Abramoff scandal was the tip of the iceberg. Unemployment in the US is approaching 10 percent, in Indian country it is twice that. And yet not a peep from the national mainstream press about the corruption, the disenrollment, the arrests and banishment of community activists who are trying to do something about all this.

                                                                                                      Mr. President, are you going to direct the US Attorneys to vigorously pursue the prosecution of tribal leaders and private investors who are siphoning off billions in much needed revenue from Indian Country gaming operations? And will you support the establishment of a free and independent Indian press so these kinds of problems can get a proper airing before they happen again?

                                                                                                      Remember, Barack Obama is not only the first African American president, he is the first president who is a member of an indigenous tribe, the Luo of Kenya. President Obama has more Luo tribal blood (one half) than 80 percent of the enrolled Cherokee have Cherokee tribal blood.

                                                                                                      I know it has zero chance of being asked, but someday, sometime, someone will hear us. Maybe the first tribal president should be given a chance to answer those questions and help us get FREEDOM OF THE PRESS IN INDIAN COUNTRY!!

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113813,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"jopflynn"}
                                                                                                      • 6 votes
                                                                                                      #25.41 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:36 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113845,"authorDomain":"DKqwerty"}

                                                                                                      How does the President regard our space programs, specifically NASA? How does he plan to expand NASA's programs and funding, if at all? Does he feel their funding will drop, rise, or remain the same in light of our country's financial issues? Were President Bush's aspirations for a manned flight to the Moon by 2020 still a priority for NASA and the Obama administration? What about Mars? And beyond?

                                                                                                      Let's hope he's familiar with the Prime Directive...

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113845,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"DKqwerty"}
                                                                                                      • 3 votes
                                                                                                      #25.42 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:37 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113872,"authorDomain":"wendy1"}

                                                                                                      Mr. President--

                                                                                                      Many of the financial companies needing government/taxpayer help have been called "too big to fail". And yet many of those banks and financial institutions have merged as a result of buyouts and efforts to save those companies. How will we deal with financial institutions that are even bigger--what will happen if those become wholly insolvent? Some of the banking success stories have come from smaller regional or local banks that knew their clients and didn't swap loans and look at customers as a number--shouldn't we be striving for smaller banks, not bigger ones?

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113872,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"wendy1"}
                                                                                                      • 2 votes
                                                                                                      #25.43 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:38 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113881,"authorDomain":"mawilli"}

                                                                                                      With the recent bills passed costing hundreds of billions of dollars running up the national debt even further, it is painfully obvious that one of these days we will have to start paying down the deficit through taxes.Your administration knows better than anyone that the more money you have, the easier it is to find loop holes.

                                                                                                      What will you do to make our taxing system more efficient and hold citizens accountable for their equal share?

                                                                                                      Thanks!

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113881,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"mawilli"}
                                                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                                                      #25.44 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:38 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113940,"authorDomain":"ericduran"}

                                                                                                      I have a question regarding Obama's energy policy. I live in southern California and want to install photovoltaic solar on my home. While the state rebates are good here, the federal support for PV systems has always lagged way behind, only covering a portion of a system much smaller than most people would want to install, while California's rebate system allows a resident to size the system to the amount of energy the home actually uses. Is there a change coming in the federal rebate structure? An increase in support of this clean energy would boost the number of green jobs in our depressed economy here in the Coachella Valley and provide support to an overwhelmed electric grid. We have well over 300 days of sunshine here, and would like to use that to help ourselves and others. And we're interested in installing a vertical axis windmill as well, but the current rebate would be very minimal if present at all since we first want to do solar. Is there an improvement to these programs coming?? We have many neighbors who are asking these same questions as well. Thanks.

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113940,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ericduran"}
                                                                                                      • 3 votes
                                                                                                      #25.45 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:40 PM EDT
                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113941,"authorDomain":"npingree"}

                                                                                                      I am concerned about the risk of the not so new "toxic debt" plan.  The upside is contingent on so many variables. And while the upside would be significant if the plan succeeds and Wall Street would be very happy, the current amount of money involved may not be enough and failure would mean long term devastation.  Why don't just buy the bad mortgages like FDR did?  If we make a profit, "YEAH". If we lose, we lose only a percentage of the debt, not exponentially more that the cost.

                                                                                                      {"commentId":6113941,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"npingree"}
                                                                                                        #25.46 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:40 PM EDT
                                                                                                        {"commentId":6113972,"authorDomain":"james-sledge"}

                                                                                                        The President 's Making Home Affordable Refinance plan requires that the homeowner's loan be guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. What about all the other home owners who have sub-prime loans; would like to refinance, but the loan is "underwater"; and their mortgage is not guaranteed Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac?

                                                                                                        {"commentId":6113972,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"james-sledge"}
                                                                                                          #25.47 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:41 PM EDT
                                                                                                          {"commentId":6113995,"authorDomain":"hipstr07"}

                                                                                                          What are the odds that a resurgent, religious right faction in the Israeli military could pose a nuclear-armed threat to Mideast security?

                                                                                                          {"commentId":6113995,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"hipstr07"}
                                                                                                            #25.48 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:42 PM EDT
                                                                                                            {"commentId":6114025,"authorDomain":"aaasmin"}

                                                                                                            Hi Chuck,

                                                                                                            Please ask President Obama, why are you refusing to allow charges to be brought against Dick Cheney and the others responsible for committing war crimes?

                                                                                                            This is fundamental to your integrity and the integrity of this country. Not to mention the rule of law.

                                                                                                            Thank you.

                                                                                                            {"commentId":6114025,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"aaasmin"}
                                                                                                            • 11 votes
                                                                                                            #25.49 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:43 PM EDT
                                                                                                            {"commentId":6114037,"authorDomain":"sue-3334"}

                                                                                                            WHEN are you going to prosecute Bush, Cheney, et al., for their war crimes?

                                                                                                            {"commentId":6114037,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"sue-3334"}
                                                                                                            • 13 votes
                                                                                                            #25.50 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:44 PM EDT
                                                                                                            {"commentId":6114078,"authorDomain":"info-473"}

                                                                                                            war crimes: Bush and Cheney

                                                                                                            the questions is not if, but WHEN will you stop blocking the prosecution of war crimes for torture. Are you just waiting for a convenient time as Jonathon Turley suggests? You took an oath.

                                                                                                            {"commentId":6114078,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"info-473"}
                                                                                                            • 10 votes
                                                                                                            #25.51 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:45 PM EDT
                                                                                                            {"commentId":6114096,"authorDomain":"bpetterson"}

                                                                                                            Has there been any suggestion of putting the AIG bonus money in escrow accounts for the intended recipients - to start to be distributed as the economy recovers?

                                                                                                            It would help me to think that they were earning it (well, sort of) - and might give them incentive to help fix what they helped break.

                                                                                                            {"commentId":6114096,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"bpetterson"}
                                                                                                              #25.52 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:45 PM EDT
                                                                                                              {"commentId":6114134,"authorDomain":"bigtallmatt"}

                                                                                                              Hi Chuck,

                                                                                                              Thanks for doing this. I have a question regarding the economy that I think most of the media, and the administration, seem to have ignored during the first two months of Obama's presidency. Here goes...

                                                                                                              Mr. President, you talked quite a bit on the campaign trail about a renewed call for service and participation from ordinary citizens. However, that call has been acutely absent from your administration since taking office. At the same time, many Americans feel helpless as to their own personal economic situation, let alone that of the nation as a whole. Given the current state of the economy, what can ordinary citizens be expected to do in order to participate in turning the economy around?

                                                                                                              {"commentId":6114134,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"bigtallmatt"}
                                                                                                              • 5 votes
                                                                                                              #25.53 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:46 PM EDT
                                                                                                              {"commentId":6114158,"authorDomain":"wcsippo"}

                                                                                                              Allow Americans to Directly Invest in Our Country . . . AGAIN by Re-Invigorating the U S Savings Bond Program!

                                                                                                              In the past . . . during previous wars . . . there were bond drives to fund those wars and to fund the national defense. This was the basis for U S Savings Bonds. When I was a young child and young man . . . I participated in payroll savings plans to invest directly in our government through U S Savings Bonds. At that time, the interest rate made this investment worthwhile (5 - 7 %). . . and it made it easy for ALL AMERICANS . . . AT ALL INCOME LEVELS . . . TO INVEST WITHOUT A MIDDLE MAN .

                                                                                                              I would love the opportunity to invest directly in our government, reduce the defecit, fund the initiatives to bolster social security, medicare, education, infrastructure, energy and to ultimately rebuild our nation's economic system . . . and I would like the government to provide me with that opportunity once again by re-invigorating the Savings bond program so we don't have to sell our debt to over seas investors.

                                                                                                              {"commentId":6114158,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"wcsippo"}
                                                                                                              • 7 votes
                                                                                                              #25.54 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:47 PM EDT
                                                                                                              {"commentId":6114168,"authorDomain":"arete13"}

                                                                                                              I am retired USAF officer w 4 grown children in OH. 10 of my grandchildren are under 14. Any guidance or hope to offer them about their future? What I want to tell them is get as much as you can, any way you can because if you don't, those that live that way will be in charge. They will be too big to fail and you won't like what they do. I won't say that but wondered if you had a more positive message.

                                                                                                              {"commentId":6114168,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"arete13"}
                                                                                                                #25.55 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:47 PM EDT
                                                                                                                {"commentId":6114190,"authorDomain":"mmcludwig"}

                                                                                                                Why, specifically, will President Obama not allow President Bush and Vice President Cheney be charged specifically with war crimes. They violated the Geneva Convention, and by President Obama not allowing prosecution - isn't he also violating the Geneva Convention?

                                                                                                                {"commentId":6114190,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"mmcludwig"}
                                                                                                                • 10 votes
                                                                                                                #25.56 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:48 PM EDT
                                                                                                                {"commentId":6114323,"authorDomain":"eamonak"}

                                                                                                                chuck;

                                                                                                                the administration reported on the bonuses to aig last week when they were aware of them weeks if not months before. since they knew, why did geithner, senator dodd, almost the entire house AND the president think it was necessary to lie to the american people? that's right, chuck, they lied. why?

                                                                                                                {"commentId":6114323,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"eamonak"}
                                                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                                                #25.57 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:53 PM EDT
                                                                                                                {"commentId":6114327,"authorDomain":"debslp"}

                                                                                                                My question would be based on Jonathan Turley (Consitutional expert) on WHY Obama is "dialoguing" with Cheney on the merits of Bush/Cheney Torture policy vs. prosecuting the previous administration for WAR Crimes??? As Mr. Turley said, "We don't need a truth commission", we need to prosecute crimes. President Obama took an oath to do that.

                                                                                                                Can you ask him why he does not view this as a duty?

                                                                                                                {"commentId":6114327,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"debslp"}
                                                                                                                • 10 votes
                                                                                                                #25.58 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:53 PM EDT
                                                                                                                {"commentId":6114338,"authorDomain":"phlopk"}

                                                                                                                We are in the final stages of developing a hardwood pellet manufacturing plant to make wood pellets for wood pellet stoves by Sept 2009 in Maine using biowaste wood chips & saw dust. This small business will create 25+ jobs and reduced the use of foreign oil. We have large & small buyers for the wood pellets already jumping to be first in line (they are in high demand) BUT we are having trouble getting the necessary funding. How or will the economic stimlus program help us and if yes..where do we look ? Designated local banks ?

                                                                                                                {"commentId":6114338,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"phlopk"}
                                                                                                                  #25.59 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:53 PM EDT
                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6114366,"authorDomain":"phlopk"}

                                                                                                                  We are in the final stages of developing a hardwood pellet manufacturing plant to make wood pellets for wood pellet stoves by Sept 2009 in Maine using biowaste wood chips & saw dust. This small business will create 25+ jobs and reduced the use of foreign oil. We have large & small buyers for the wood pellets already jumping to be first in line (they are in high demand) BUT we are having trouble getting the necessary funding. How or will the economic stimlus program help us and if yes..where do we look ? Designated local banks ?

                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6114366,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"phlopk"}
                                                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                                                  #25.60 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:54 PM EDT
                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6114450,"authorDomain":"derek-984847"}

                                                                                                                  <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:1; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-format:other; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;} @font-face {font-family:"Microsoft Sans Serif"; panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:1627401183 -2147483648 8 0 66047 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} .MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; text-align:center;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:.5in .5in .5in .5in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->

                                                                                                                  I have heard that you are blocking efforts to prosecute members of the Bush administration for war crimes. Is this true and, if so, why?

                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6114450,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"derek-984847"}
                                                                                                                  • 3 votes
                                                                                                                  #25.61 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:57 PM EDT
                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6114458,"authorDomain":"edbishop"}

                                                                                                                  Question to President Obama:

                                                                                                                  What was the basis of your decision to appoint William Donaldson to your Economic Recovery Advisory Board given the fact that he was appointed by his fellow Yale Skull & Bones member, George W. Bush, to head the SEC during the critical period when he should have been regulating the meteoric rise of his fellow Skull & Bones cronies such as the #1 & 2 hedge fund managers Edward S. Lampert and Steven Schartzman, not to mention actively ignoring the Madoff whistleblowers? Isn't Mr. Donaldson the epitome of a crony guarding the financial house?

                                                                                                                  Note to Chuck: Please look into the facts presented above. Can it really be just a coincidence that so many Skull & Bones members suddenly became unimaginably rich under William Donaldson's term?

                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6114458,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"edbishop"}
                                                                                                                    #25.62 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:58 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114470,"authorDomain":"pol"}

                                                                                                                    Mr. President,

                                                                                                                    The Bush administration refused to join the International Criminal Court, withdrawing in 2002 from the Rome Statute which had previously been signed by Bill Clinton. You seem to support it; when it issued an arrest warrant for Omar al-Bashir, a spokesman for your National Security Advisor stated: “We support the ICC in its pursuit of those who've perpetrated war crimes. We see no reason to support deferral at this time." Will you support US membership in the ICC, and if so, will you commit to not interfere with any potential investigations of US war criminals?

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114470,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"pol"}
                                                                                                                    • 5 votes
                                                                                                                    #25.63 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:58 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114502,"authorDomain":"laurie-7"}

                                                                                                                    Hey Chuck,

                                                                                                                    The growth in the economy over the last, oh, say 10-15 years, has been paralleled by a growth in personal credit card debt, which makes it look to the untrained eye that the middle class faked a chunk of the economic growth by cavalierly putting it on plastic like the next round of drinks. "This one's on me!" At the same time, the banks who (pardon me while I change metaphors) put a giant juicy worm on the line by offering outrageously high credit lines to people who can't afford it, and have set the hook with interest rates jacked up to as much as 29%, making it less and less possible to make payments and pay down this debt.

                                                                                                                    While I understand completely the desire to help students pay student loan debt, and homeowners restructure their mortgages, I don't hear anywhere near the same public outrage at the banks who, with one hand, are getting TAXPAYER MONEY from the bailout, and with the other hand, getting taxpayer money in usurous finance charges and late fees. Will Obama work to put a cap on interest rates for credit card debt for companies getting bailout money? Will he work to restrict the obscene credit offers made to people who can't afford it? Last I checked, usury was a "bad thing". Is it not still?

                                                                                                                    thanks - Laurie Feinswog

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114502,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"laurie-7"}
                                                                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                                                                    #25.64 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:59 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114534,"authorDomain":"mavenuniversity"}

                                                                                                                    If I were to ask my friends what's on their minds, I'm confident it would be something like this: "Why are you [President Obama] retaining Tim Geithner?" Actually, I'd love an answer on that myself. In fact, I'd still love to know why the President hired a Wall-Street insider in the first place.

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114534,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"mavenuniversity"}
                                                                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                                                                    #25.65 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:01 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114579,"authorDomain":"grassroots1"}

                                                                                                                    Today I saw Jonathan Turley make an excellent point on the Rachel Maddow show. Dick Cheney and George W. Bush have unequivocally committed war crimes in their support and continuance of torture as a method for reducing the effect of terrorism in the world. Or at least that's their excuse. I would like to ask Obama why he has not held them responsible for these heinous and unacceptable war crimes, especially in light of his recent comments about Dick Cheney on 60 minutes. Thank you.

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114579,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"grassroots1"}
                                                                                                                    • 11 votes
                                                                                                                    #25.66 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:02 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114636,"authorDomain":"Splatterthought"}

                                                                                                                    Mr. Todd,

                                                                                                                    My question to President Obama would be:

                                                                                                                    Mr President, why have you not directed Attorney General Eric Holder to assign a special prosecutor to investigate alleged torture and domestic spying and any other criminal activities by President Bush's Adiministration?

                                                                                                                    Do you believe you have a constitutional duty to do this?

                                                                                                                    Are you planning on upholding your constitutional obligation to do this?

                                                                                                                    When can the people of this nation expect this very important action to begin.

                                                                                                                    These are heinous and unpatriotic acts that should not be tolerated. There are questionably many more constitutionally questionable policies or acts that need to be investigated, but these are the two I cannot believe you have not acted on.

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114636,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"Splatterthought"}
                                                                                                                    • 12 votes
                                                                                                                    #25.67 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:04 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114687,"authorDomain":"jools-1"}

                                                                                                                    Mr. President,

                                                                                                                    Why are you standing in the way of appointing a special prosecutor to investigate the probable war crimes of the Bush administration? Did you not take an oath to uphold the law? You need to do this because it's the only right thing to do. Maybe you don't want to dwell in the past, but the law is simply the law. Ignoring the crimes of the Bush administration is tacit complicity and the world is watching.

                                                                                                                    Julie Ross & David Zimmerman

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114687,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"jools-1"}
                                                                                                                    • 6 votes
                                                                                                                    #25.68 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:06 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114717,"authorDomain":"darkegon"}

                                                                                                                    When will President Obama address the student loan situation in this country as he has the housing/mortgage crisis? Like many, I borrowed money to pay my college tuition. I was encouraged by my financial aid office to take out private loans at adjustable interest rates (sound familiar?) to supplement government loans and grants. When I graduated from college, my loans totalled $64, 000. Six years later, because of the market's increased interest rates, I now owe almost $90, 000 and that's AFTER I've been making regular payments since graduating. I can't buy a home or get a car loan because my debt to income ratio is too large. I'd ask President Obama to prevent unscrupulous lenders from misleading students and encouraging them to take on more debt to pay for school than they will ever be able to repay; if we can afford bailout money for the banks, can't we put more money into education? Thanks!

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114717,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"darkegon"}
                                                                                                                    • 4 votes
                                                                                                                    #25.69 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:08 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114825,"authorDomain":"Splatterthought"}

                                                                                                                    Mr. Todd,

                                                                                                                    My question to President Obama would be:

                                                                                                                    Mr President, why have you not directed Attorney General Eric Holder to assign a special prosecutor to investigate alleged torture and domestic spying and any other criminal activities by President Bush's Adiministration?

                                                                                                                    Do you believe you have a constitutional duty to do this?

                                                                                                                    Are you planning on upholding your constitutional obligation to do this?

                                                                                                                    When can the people of this nation expect this very important action to begin.

                                                                                                                    These are heinous and unpatriotic acts that should not be tolerated. There are questionably many more constitutionally questionable policies or acts that need to be investigated, but these are the two I cannot understand why you have not acted on this.

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114825,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"Splatterthought"}
                                                                                                                    • 9 votes
                                                                                                                    #25.70 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:13 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114907,"authorDomain":"cortect"}

                                                                                                                    Thanks for asking:

                                                                                                                    Ask President Obama: Can bad mortgages Primary Residencebe be treated different from Secondary (investment) mortgages. These are the main part of the mortgage mess that can use the most help. For example if your troubled mortgage is from your Primary Residence these should be allowed to refinance at t fixed current lower interest rate and for the Current market Price...not the inflated price they paid. By doing these you are TRULLY helping a REAL home owner and not a speculator or FLIPPER

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114907,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"cortect"}
                                                                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                                                                    #25.71 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:17 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114932,"authorDomain":"lane-3"}

                                                                                                                    Why has there not been a special proscutor appointed to deal with the war criminal (tortures and detainings) issues from the past adminisitration? Isn't it better that we recognize and punish wrong doings with our own then wait for them to arrested and dealt with in foreign countries? I know it is an unpopular thing to have to face, but breaking the law and not honoring our constiuttion, (as in the previous administration) the foundation of the U.S. government is unacceptable behavior and should not be exonerated .

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6114932,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"lane-3"}
                                                                                                                    • 7 votes
                                                                                                                    #25.72 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:18 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6115327,"authorDomain":"cortect"}

                                                                                                                    Please ask President Obama:\

                                                                                                                    Why not bring back the ability to deduct the interest rate you pay on your Credit Cards and your Car Loan in your income tax as we used to be able to until Ronald Reagan remove this?

                                                                                                                    Since there is so much credit card debt out there, and with the car companies are tanking...these deductions will help the tax payer...pretty quickly

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6115327,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"cortect"}
                                                                                                                    • 4 votes
                                                                                                                    #25.73 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:37 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6115590,"authorDomain":"epohl57"}

                                                                                                                    Please ask President Obama...

                                                                                                                    If your job is to protect and defend the constitution, why then aren't you pursuing Vice President Cheney for war crimes - many legal minds see this as a clear cut case and your administration seems to be blocking this effort.

                                                                                                                    BTW Chuck - I worked on Obama's campaign for nearly 2 years, was a precinct captain and maxed out my personal donations.....this is really important to many of us who worked hard to get the President elected. Its a matter of principle and I believe a matter of national security since it would telegraph to the world that we say what we mean and mean what we say when it comes to us being a nation of laws rather than a nation of ideology.

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6115590,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"epohl57"}
                                                                                                                    • 7 votes
                                                                                                                    #25.74 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:49 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6115619,"authorDomain":"jand71791"}

                                                                                                                    Bailout money to banks to trickle to businesses to trickle to hirees. This is another trickle down theory. You promised trickle up during your campaign. How about programs akin to CCC and WPA; hire people directly instead of government to businesses, banks, and insurance consortiums in the same old trickle down approach? Eccles said deficit spending was good during a recession/depression but not trickle down in direction.

                                                                                                                    Q2 When will your law degree and experience teaching constitutional law finally take precedence over political expediency; in other words, when will those who tortured be brought to justice so our nation does not look like it condones the acts of war criminals?

                                                                                                                    Dr. Anderson

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6115619,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"jand71791"}
                                                                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                                                                    #25.75 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:50 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6115684,"authorDomain":"jand71791"}

                                                                                                                    Q1 Bailout money to banks to trickle to businesses to trickle to hirees. This is another trickle down theory. You promised trickle up during your campaign. How about programs akin to CCC and WPA; hire people directly instead of government to businesses, banks, and insurance consortiums in the same old trickle down approach? Eccles said deficit spending was good during a recession/depression but not trickle down in direction.

                                                                                                                    Q2 When will your law degree and experience teaching constitutional law finally take precedence over political expediency; in other words, when will those who tortured be brought to justice so our nation does not look like it condones the acts of war criminals?

                                                                                                                    Dr. Anderson

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6115684,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"jand71791"}
                                                                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                                                                    #25.76 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:53 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6115776,"authorDomain":"jdetate"}

                                                                                                                    This is from the Blue Mug coffee and networking, morning idea validation, working group.

                                                                                                                    Is any consideration being given the initial cost, maintenance cost and disaster survivabilty of distributed, residential and regional power generation vs centralized mega power plant generation, long haul transmission over a huge and vulnerable grid?

                                                                                                                    There are merits to both, but shouldn't we be shifting to a more individually empowering approach for our future?

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6115776,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"jdetate"}
                                                                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                                                                    #25.77 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:58 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6115819,"authorDomain":"michael-owskey"}

                                                                                                                    My friends and co-workers would like to ask the following question of President Obama.

                                                                                                                    "I believe the following question is not one of left or right, red state or blue. I would like to know why still, even after the Red Cross has confirmed that we used tourture on captives under our care you refuse to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate any crimes commited by the past administration. If you say we are a nation of laws, how can we not follow our obligations to international law?"

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6115819,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"michael-owskey"}
                                                                                                                    • 6 votes
                                                                                                                    #25.78 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:02 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6115836,"authorDomain":"lanekidd"}

                                                                                                                    Mr. President: Please explain to average Americans why they should support a bailout of our nation's banks with their tax dollars when many of those same banks are gouging them with 32 percent interest on their credit card balances because they were three days late on their monthly payment?

                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6115836,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"lanekidd"}
                                                                                                                      #25.79 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:02 PM EDT
                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6115837,"authorDomain":"ptracy52"}

                                                                                                                      3/23/09 9:40pm

                                                                                                                      Dear Mr. Todd,

                                                                                                                      Here is my question for President Obama:

                                                                                                                      “The New York MTA recently announced a fare increase for NY City Subway and Bus riders. In the Omnibus Spending act, over $2.5 million dollars was earmarked to build a Ferry Terminal Building in Glen Cove, NY. The cost of this Ferry Terminal Building will be $32 million dollars and it may help 200 very wealthy commuters. (Or $160,000 each.) No Ferry company has announced that it would be willing to actually operate a Ferry Service from Glen Cove to Wall Street. Wouldn’t it have been a better use of money to help the MTA rather than to waste our hard earned money on a Ferry Terminal Building?”

                                                                                                                      (1,700 of my neighbors have signed a petition in opposition to this proposed development.)

                                                                                                                      Thanks for reading this.

                                                                                                                      Pat Tracy

                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6115837,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ptracy52"}
                                                                                                                        #25.80 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:02 PM EDT
                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6115944,"authorDomain":"svigil3571"}

                                                                                                                        Mr. President:

                                                                                                                        Are you going to appoint a special prosecutor on war crimes committed by the Bush administration, and if not, Why Not?

                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6115944,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"svigil3571"}
                                                                                                                        • 7 votes
                                                                                                                        #25.81 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:08 PM EDT
                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6116146,"authorDomain":"jodub"}

                                                                                                                        Thanks for this opportunity, Chuck

                                                                                                                        Here's my question for President Obama:

                                                                                                                        Fundamental to our society, economy, political system is the presumption that most people are honest. The foundation of our "home" is broken. People don't trust bankers, investment firms, our political leaders, and even the clergy. Selfishness and greed are at the heart of the problem. Mr. President, what are you going to do to let we, the people, follow the money? We need complete visibility and transparency (on the internet) for every dollar that flows to the benefit of every elected official in any form in every way from all sources. We must also have full reporting of every dollar being spent (and proposed to be spent) by our government, including all "earmarks" however they're disguised.

                                                                                                                        There is a broad and growing populist anger and disgust -- a complete distrust of our system and our leaders. What I'm describing will require a strong will to say "no" to cozy players, offending many insiders, for the greater good. You cannot fix any of the many problems you face (we all face), Mr. President, until you build a crystal clear pipeline through which we can see all of the money moving into and out of Washington. That's the only way you can succeed -- by healing public confidence in the integrity of the system. Will you give us that lens?

                                                                                                                        Thank you for listening.

                                                                                                                        Joe Wleklinski, Elmhurst, IL

                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6116146,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"jodub"}
                                                                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                                                                        #25.82 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:20 PM EDT
                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6116305,"authorDomain":"ScottCF"}

                                                                                                                        President Obama,

                                                                                                                        What are the benchmarks to determine if the stimulus and bailout funds are having their desired effects? If this is not known how will we know to stop injecting more funds / trying other ways of turning the economy around? If these are in development who is developing them and when may we expect to see them.

                                                                                                                        Thank you.

                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6116305,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ScottCF"}
                                                                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                                                                        #25.83 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:29 PM EDT
                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6116337,"authorDomain":"katrinka0925"}

                                                                                                                        Mr. President can you please explain to us how our economy failed? Who is responsible for stock and bank deregulation. Why was this allowed?

                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6116337,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"katrinka0925"}
                                                                                                                          #25.84 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:30 PM EDT
                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6116374,"authorDomain":"thementch"}

                                                                                                                          How does selling the "toxic assets" or "legacy assets" package differ from the bundle of bad loans wrapped up into investment instruments that AIG developed and sold and which got us into this mess to a large degree? Is it just a matter of the guarantee by the the government? Thank you.

                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6116374,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"thementch"}
                                                                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                                                                          #25.85 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:32 PM EDT
                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6116379,"authorDomain":"vicki-wards"}

                                                                                                                          Where's my relief? I'm upsidedown on my home in Chicago that I purchased in 2006, 115% loan to value, yet I've never missed a payment or even been late. I can't get any mortgage company to even discuss refinancing so that I can at least lower my interest rate.

                                                                                                                          I'm 53 and my long term savings are worth about 50% of their original value and I fear I don't have enough time to rebuild my savings before a decent retirement age. I'll probably have to work until I'm 70 years old.

                                                                                                                          I am the backbone of this country, and I'm getting killed on multiple fronts with nowhere to turn. My single financial blessing is that i do have a good job and I'm not worried about getting laid off.

                                                                                                                          What kind of help can Americans like me expect?

                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6116379,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"vicki-wards"}
                                                                                                                          • 3 votes
                                                                                                                          #25.86 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:32 PM EDT
                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6116502,"authorDomain":"Lynn985"}

                                                                                                                          Enough of the daily tv appearances. When are you going to start governing, not running for the next election. We need leadership and good governance not politics as usual. The economy is job one, two and three and just because you can multi-task does not mean that you are getting the job done for the biggest problem devastating this country.

                                                                                                                          Madison, WI

                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6116502,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"Lynn985"}
                                                                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                                                                          #25.87 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:38 PM EDT
                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6116535,"authorDomain":"srobinson64"}

                                                                                                                          Mr. President:

                                                                                                                          Although you have attempte to provide relief for homeowners who are current on their mortgages, the banks are all indicating they do not yet have enough guidelines to implement these loan modifications. What more is the treasury going to do to get these banks to modify the loans for the non-delinquent homeowners - who if not helped may soon join the ranks of the delinquent ones.

                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6116535,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"srobinson64"}
                                                                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                                                                          #25.88 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:40 PM EDT
                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6116538,"authorDomain":"erinmurphy75"}

                                                                                                                          Mr. Todd Here is my question for President Obama:

                                                                                                                          I work as a Nurse providing health care to undeserved children in inner city Oakland, California. My hospital struggles to keep its doors open every day, as we pledge to provide care to all children.

                                                                                                                          In California, as you know our State's budget is lacking billions of dollars. Deep cuts are being felt all across the state. My question to you Mr. President, is why do the children always seem to take these cuts first? School budgets and spending on children's health care are almost always at the top of the list to be cut. Are these children not our future leaders, and the voters of tomorrow? How can these young minds and bodies not be worth cultivating, and investing in? How will you protect them from future budget cuts?

                                                                                                                          Thank you.

                                                                                                                          Erin,

                                                                                                                          San Francisco

                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6116538,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"erinmurphy75"}
                                                                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                                                                          #25.89 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:40 PM EDT
                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6116556,"authorDomain":"swimsafe"}

                                                                                                                          My question to the President would be:

                                                                                                                          Dear Mr. President,

                                                                                                                          Can you please provide a comprehensive list to the voters of this country which lawmakers, regardless of party affiliation, are on record of voting NO to any form of healthcare for the children of our nation.

                                                                                                                          I think this would be a good starting point for the discussion of affordable healthcare for all citizens of the United States of America.

                                                                                                                          Thank you.

                                                                                                                          Kathy

                                                                                                                          Chadds Ford, PA

                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6116556,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"swimsafe"}
                                                                                                                            #25.90 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:41 PM EDT
                                                                                                                            {"commentId":6116591,"authorDomain":"mister-daveg"}

                                                                                                                            Mr. President,

                                                                                                                            Why does the COBRA Continuation Coverage Assistance Under The American Recovery And Reinvestment Act only apply to people who lost their jobs and health insurance after September 1, 2008? What about all those people who have had to pay the huge COBRA premiums since before last September, during a time when they can least afford it? Many of these people are forced to choose between their health insurance, their rent or their groceries.

                                                                                                                            {"commentId":6116591,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"mister-daveg"}
                                                                                                                              #25.91 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:42 PM EDT
                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6116600,"authorDomain":"afersko"}

                                                                                                                              Health Care.

                                                                                                                              The new budget asked for $400 hundred or more billion to start the process of universal coverage. My question is this. If the average family spends $12,000 and single person spends $6,000 for coverage, the total spent by everyone is in the area of $1,350,000,000,000 per year. (6,000+12,000)/2 times 150,000,000(U.S Population covered ?)PER YEAR. If all this went into one fund, I cannot believe that everyone in the US could not be covered. Why not have a single payer system, eliminate the profit and cover every one. We pay taxes for the police, fire, army. There is no profit in these systems, just taxes to cover the cost. Eliminate the medical insurance, substitute a tax (probably) will be cheaper. John MaCCain complained that your health would be between you and the government. His plan is between you and private for profit companies. I'll take the government.

                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6116600,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"afersko"}
                                                                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                                                                              #25.92 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:43 PM EDT
                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6116656,"authorDomain":"rgindhar"}

                                                                                                                              I would like to know why illegal aliens have a right to receive Social Security? The rest of us have paid into SS all our working lives and it does not seem right to just give it to people who really have no right to be here.

                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6116656,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"rgindhar"}
                                                                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                                                                              #25.93 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:46 PM EDT
                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6116792,"authorDomain":"Blavier"}

                                                                                                                              I don't care about our economy... people are working on it. I don't care about mortages, housing crises, bank failures or bailouts... people are working on it. I don't care about healthcare... people are working on it. I don't care about any of the 'in the news, in the front of everyone's minds' crises because people are working on them. There are enough people already asking those questions and so what difference would another question about those things make?

                                                                                                                              What I want to ask the President AND HEAR HIM ANSWER about is this...

                                                                                                                              How he will repair the damage done to the US Constitution by the Bush Administration. I don't care about his desire to only 'look forward' because he is trying to build a house on a damaged foundation and such as house cannot stand no matter how inconvenient it is that the foundation is damaged and it wasn't your doing. I want to know why he is not actively and agreesively appointing Special Prosecutors to investigate and charge everyone in the previous administration who broke the law, was corrupt, violated their very oaths to 'preserve, protect and defend THE CONSTITUTION (not the nation, The Constitution'. I want to know what kind of precedents is he allowing to be created by letting an administration leave office and bear no responsibility or penalty for their actions and decisions. I want to know how a teacher of Constitutional Law can allow the Constitution itself to remain damaged and the damage not be addressed because it is inconvenient or would be difficult. HIS OWN oath of office obligated HIM 'to preserve, protect and defend THE CONSTITUTION'... in fact, the ONLY two things a president specifically swears to do in his oath of office are to "FAITHFULLY execute the Office of President' and to 'PRESERVE, PROTECT and DEFEND The Consitution'. By the very oath he is obligated to take by the Constitution itself, doesn't that make addressing the damage done by the Bush Administration TO The Constitution his highest Constitutional obligation AS President? I want to know why he doesn't have any interest in preserving, protecting or defending The Constitution and investigating and indicting those who committed crimes against and violations of The Constitution.

                                                                                                                              THAT is what I want the President to be asked about and what I want to hear him address.

                                                                                                                              Thank you for this opportunity.

                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6116792,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"Blavier"}
                                                                                                                              • 6 votes
                                                                                                                              #25.94 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:54 PM EDT
                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6116834,"authorDomain":"rewarren1"}

                                                                                                                              Chuck,

                                                                                                                              I have wondered why, in all the discussions revolving around the budget, no one has brought up the idea of decreasing the defense and military budget, including the cost of new defense technology. I have seen analysis that has all military and defense spending as a percentage of the 2009 budget at 54%. It would seem to me that the new budget should take into consideration our priorities- such as health care, education, infrastructure rebuilding - and start balancing the need for defense with the need for what makes a nation great. Which is not solely military might. I have to believe that there is an amazing amount of waste in all that we spend on our defense that could be allocated elsewhere.

                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6116834,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"rewarren1"}
                                                                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                                                                              #25.95 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:57 PM EDT
                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6116848,"authorDomain":"djlane1"}

                                                                                                                              Thanks Chuck.

                                                                                                                              My wife and I have always done the right thing. We bought a house for less than we could afford. We have not borrowed against it, in fact we pay extra each month. And we have never considered anything but a fixed loan. I am upset that money I am paying in taxes is going to people that got into a loan they could not afford. I would like to ask, why can't the government recoup some of the money by getting a fixed percentage when the home is sold? I see the government giving money out but not getting any back.

                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6116848,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"djlane1"}
                                                                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                                                                              #25.96 - Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:58 PM EDT
                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6116983,"authorDomain":"danieljo"}

                                                                                                                              Hi Chuck,

                                                                                                                              Thanks for doing this, its a great idea.

                                                                                                                              One item that myself, friends and family, have been obsessing about, for years, is the Bush policy on torture. It was obvious, from the beginning, that not only was this a very bad policy, that would make us many more enemies, but it was also in violation of US and international law. I would like to ask President Obama that since he swore an oath to uphold the Constitution, he cannot pick and choose which laws he decides to enforce. Bush/Cheney, and company violated US law; President Obama is blocking an investigation into their war crimes; blocking this investigation makes him culpable to their crimes. When is he going to uphold the law and prosecute these criminals?

                                                                                                                              Thank you.

                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6116983,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"danieljo"}
                                                                                                                              • 4 votes
                                                                                                                              #25.97 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:06 AM EDT
                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6117160,"authorDomain":"Homechikki"}

                                                                                                                              I work in the financial industry, as a customer contact representative, and I make about 35k a year. We see our jobs go overseas all the time. They can hire 4 or 5 people over there for what they have to pay one of us here.

                                                                                                                              Have you thought of incenting corporations to keep jobs here, maybe by reversing some of the tax breaks that started the trend?

                                                                                                                              Thank you for the opportunity to be a part of the conversation.

                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6117160,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"Homechikki"}
                                                                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                                                                              #25.98 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:18 AM EDT
                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6117263,"authorDomain":"3rd-party"}

                                                                                                                              After all the abuse of taxpayer funds and no increase in lending, why is the united states the only nation in the world giving away these funds without explicit conditions?

                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6117263,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"3rd-party"}
                                                                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                                                                              #25.99 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:24 AM EDT
                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6117285,"authorDomain":"PappyOne"}

                                                                                                                              Thanks for asking Chuck. I'd like to hear about efforts to decrease world tension, specifically with Russia. NATO was set up to protect Europe against Russia duiring the cold war. There's no more cold war. Russia is supposedly an ally. Why are we ringing Russia with missiles and why does NATO still exist? Why do we allow the con job to continue from Saakashvilli's paid American stooge Randy Scheunemann that Russia was the aggressor in South Osettia when Russia only invaded to stop Saakashvilli's genocide against the Russians living there? Why do we need to keep Russia looking like the 'bad guy'? What is the future for NATO and our relationship with Russia?

                                                                                                                              If you'd like to see a video of a South Osetian girl living in the US who was in Georgia visiting relatives when Saakashvilli launched his genocide, and her gratitude to the Russians when they came to save them, it's on the 'Russia' page on my web site at . Thank you.

                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6117285,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"PappyOne"}
                                                                                                                                #25.100 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:25 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6117380,"authorDomain":"bridiaz"}

                                                                                                                                Hi,

                                                                                                                                I would like to know if the president will publish (hopefully on his website) a detailed outline for his education plan. We know from his recent speech, the vague points of his ed. plan but myself and other educators would like to know specifics.

                                                                                                                                Thank you

                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6117380,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"bridiaz"}
                                                                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                #25.101 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:32 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6117394,"authorDomain":"kim-paul777"}

                                                                                                                                Thank you for this opportunity. I am an enrolled Blackfeet Indian (isn't it downright predjudicial that Hispanics or Asians or African Americans don't have to provide proof of a pedigree or blood quantum, to be considered Hispanic or Asian or African American?), and I have a question for you...one that never gets asked, one that awakens centuries of post-colonial guilt, a question that could be the beginnings of a sincere commitment to better the third world conditions of America's First Peoples...we don't have a voice Chuck...we've never had a voice...no NAACP, no ACLU...we've been indoctrinated into the belief that we have no worth...we are trained from birth to not look people in the eyes...we've been starved, poisoned, massacred, raped, and had generations of our children stolen from us and either placed in military style boarding schools, tb sanitariums, or outright adopted out to non-American Indian families at rates 70% higher than non-Indian families, we've withstood the Eugenics policies of the 1960's and 1970's....yet we still have no voice...Will you speak for us, Chuck? (will you read the previous to Pres. Obama?)

                                                                                                                                The question for President Barack Obama is this: Our greatest hope in an entire century, and beyond, is placed in you. Throughout this nation from the Pequot to the Navajo, from the Apache to the Tohona O'dham, from the Athabaskan to the Inuit, from the Sioux to the Cheyenne, from the Assiniboine to the Swinomish (and of-course the Blackfeet), and the many, many more tribes...we CRY out to you Mr. Obama...will you help us? Will you help us? WILL YOU HELP US???? We have no NAACP, no ACLU, no Martin Luther King Jr. ...we have no-one! We have never asked much from a country that has never cared enough to honor it's word. Will you be our Honorable Martin Luther King Jr.? Our children's blood cries out to you President Obama, they are being massacred still. You were elected sir, for such a time as this. Consider where the African American people would be today, if not for the many heroes who took a stand...who said No More. President Obama, we the American Indian people...good people...HAVE A DREAM...a dream where we can feed our children, a dream where our children's life expectancy is equal to your children's, a dream where we have clean water to drink, a dream where someone will finally take a stand for us and institute a viable program of higher education...another forgotten treaty right, like our non-existent healthcare. We have a dream President Obama that you are that man, a man of honor, a man that will come to Pine Ridge, SD...Browning, MT....Shiprock... Lame Deer...Rosebud...a man who will see the truth of what MOST reservations REALLY look like? A man who will say NO MORE! Will you be this man? Will you defend the defenseless? WILL YOU HELP US?

                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6117394,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"kim-paul777"}
                                                                                                                                • 6 votes
                                                                                                                                #25.102 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:33 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6117415,"authorDomain":"concernedphx"}

                                                                                                                                My wife has been a highly qualified (Bachelor's in her field and a Master's in Education) 8th grade science teacher in Chandler, AZ for the past year and the year previous she taught in West Phoenix. She was told today that they are RIF-ing (Reduction in Force) all 1st year teachers. Essentially that means they are not going to re-up their contracts. It has also been reported that in many other districts they are RIF-ing 2nd and 3rd year teachers. I was under the understanding that a big chunk of the stimulus money was going to be provided to states to help them keep teachers and not have to do these reductions. Now Phoenix metro schools are looking down the barrel of 40+ student classrooms and tenured teachers teaching subjects that they have no background in. Could you PLEASE have your group research this, formulate a question, and bring it up to President Obama so that there can be a spotlight put on it.

                                                                                                                                Thanks

                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6117415,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"concernedphx"}
                                                                                                                                  #25.103 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:34 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6117524,"authorDomain":"PappyOne"}

                                                                                                                                  Forgot the rules - no linking to outside stuff, sorry you can't see the youtube video of the girl from South Osetia. Anyway, I'd like to know what President Obama has in mind to do with this stress-filled inherited US/ Russia relationship. The only message Obama got from Medvedev on his election was something like - "if you put missiles in Poland we'll put them on our European border". Thanks again.

                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6117524,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"PappyOne"}
                                                                                                                                    #25.104 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:42 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6117534,"authorDomain":"disney-world-walt"}

                                                                                                                                    Hello, I am wondering if there were a way to get money instantly into the economy in a very common sense way with having everyone pay half their rent and mortgages and then have the government pay back the banks and landlords. This would get money into the peoples hands immediately and they need this now, not having to wait for some tax or other process to go through. The people would definitely appreciate the relief. Thank you for maybe considering this option. If it helps Americans and our new president accomplish some good changes I think this might be an answer.

                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6117534,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"disney-world-walt"}
                                                                                                                                      #25.105 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:43 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6117609,"authorDomain":"dchadwell7"}

                                                                                                                                      I would like to know how America will transition from the stimulus jobs to non-stimulus jobs after the government money is used up. I need a lesson on how this will work so we don't end up in the same mess again. Thanks, Todd for asking for input.

                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6117609,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"dchadwell7"}
                                                                                                                                      • 2 votes
                                                                                                                                      #25.106 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:48 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6117715,"authorDomain":"99beatrice"}

                                                                                                                                      Please ask the following:

                                                                                                                                      Mr Obama, when will you appoint a special prosecutor to investigate and bring to justice those responsible for breaking American law by promoting torture, kidnapping, spying on American without warrants and other well documented crimes during the last 8 years?

                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6117715,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"99beatrice"}
                                                                                                                                      • 8 votes
                                                                                                                                      #25.107 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:58 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6117991,"authorDomain":"davidlsteed-1"}

                                                                                                                                      Dear Mr. Todd,

                                                                                                                                      Please ask the President why he insists on blocking investigation into known war crimes by officials of the former administration?

                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6117991,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"davidlsteed-1"}
                                                                                                                                      • 6 votes
                                                                                                                                      #25.108 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:27 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6118125,"authorDomain":"olduncledave"}

                                                                                                                                      Mr President: Do you think the United States will ever again be at peace?

                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6118125,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"olduncledave"}
                                                                                                                                        #25.109 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:42 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6118190,"authorDomain":"bionicdance"}

                                                                                                                                        "Can I have a cookie?"

                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6118190,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"bionicdance"}
                                                                                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                        #25.110 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:51 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6118231,"authorDomain":"bob-88"}

                                                                                                                                        Chuck, thank you for this opportunity. My questions for President Obama are:

                                                                                                                                        Are you going to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate war crimes by the Bush administration? If not, why?

                                                                                                                                        I am retired receiving a Social Security benefit. The so-called “tax on Social Security” is in reality a surcharge tax on other gross income. How come this “tax” is treated as income by the IRS and not directly redeposited into the Social Security trust fund? This revenue is, after all, recovered SS benefits from more affluent seniors, based on their ability to pay. Redepositing this revenue directly into the trust fund would immeasurably strengthen it, benefiting all seniors. Why are seniors being ripped off in this manor?

                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6118231,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"bob-88"}
                                                                                                                                        • 4 votes
                                                                                                                                        #25.111 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:56 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6118261,"authorDomain":"proco30"}

                                                                                                                                        Please tell us what technologies/processes your science advisors are most excited about? What sort of breakthrough technologies can we expect in 2009-2010? What are the top 3 science stories we should pay attention to in 2009-2010?

                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6118261,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"proco30"}
                                                                                                                                          #25.112 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:00 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6118461,"authorDomain":"masterxel"}

                                                                                                                                          Mr. President,

                                                                                                                                          Why have your policies so far ignored the endless supply of clean energy we could obtain from nuclear fission? The scientific problems have been solved, why haven't the political problems?

                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6118461,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"masterxel"}
                                                                                                                                          • 3 votes
                                                                                                                                          #25.113 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:28 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6118629,"authorDomain":"gscottt"}

                                                                                                                                          Universal Healthcare - as a small business owner, how long can we allow health insurance companies to increase premiums by 15 to 20% on an ANNUAL basis? At the 15% rate, premiums double every 5 years. How long are we going to allow such poorly explained, massive rate hikes from the insurance companies?? At what point do you plan on protecting small business owners and, more broadly speaking, Americans, from these rate hikes?

                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6118629,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"gscottt"}
                                                                                                                                          • 3 votes
                                                                                                                                          #25.114 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:53 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6118709,"authorDomain":"lisamiamoore"}

                                                                                                                                          Mr. President;

                                                                                                                                          I would like to know why you have not appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the war crimes committed by Bush and Cheney? Did you not take an oath before all of us and God to uphold the law? Torture is against the law. Why aren't we arresting these people?

                                                                                                                                          Thank you,

                                                                                                                                          Lisa Moore

                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6118709,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"lisamiamoore"}
                                                                                                                                          • 7 votes
                                                                                                                                          #25.115 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:06 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6118740,"authorDomain":"dapar2"}

                                                                                                                                          What are you going to do Mr. President about the tyranny of the student loan trap? Many in our country are now no more than indentured servants to such companies as Sally May and ACS. These are people who have fallen upon unfortunate circumstances or now have serious illness. Yet, they are treated like dirt or rip off artists. So called relief is no more than a sham. Interest on their loans pile up their debt to impossible levels to ever pay off. Our country needs to do better for those who only sin was trying to pay for an education.

                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6118740,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"dapar2"}
                                                                                                                                          • 3 votes
                                                                                                                                          #25.116 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:12 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6118812,"authorDomain":"optomistic"}

                                                                                                                                          Chuck, thank you for this opportunity. My questions for President Obama are:

                                                                                                                                          1) "If the rule of law means anything, it must mean at least this: Those who act or are in positions of authority in our government are subject to the same laws as everyone else. This has been the American tradition, the crown jewel of a free society, a government of laws, not of men...Some take the position that we should forgive and forget or "look forward," as President Obama ambiguously suggested. But "looking forward" without prosecution of past crimes brings the unsettling question of why prosecute future crimes of the same nature? After all, all criminal prosecutions are prosecutions for past acts, not future ones. And, make no mistake, these are real crimes: criminal prisoner abuse, criminal violations of the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act involving illegal wiretaps, as well as grave violations of numerous treaties and conventions, which are war crimes as defined by federal statute."

                                                                                                                                          Mr President, why have you not directed Attorney General Eric Holder to assign a special prosecutor to investigate alleged torture and domestic spying and any other criminal activities by President Bush's Adiministration? Why are you putting roadblocks in the way of investigating these war crimes?

                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6118812,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"optomistic"}
                                                                                                                                          • 6 votes
                                                                                                                                          #25.117 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:31 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6118848,"authorDomain":"schapple"}

                                                                                                                                          I'd like to know if the administration's plans for financial regulation include any measures to reform the rating agencies, which have failed us so badly recently.

                                                                                                                                          Thanks for asking for our questions.

                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6118848,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"schapple"}
                                                                                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                          #25.118 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:38 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6118858,"authorDomain":"stupalski"}

                                                                                                                                          <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->

                                                                                                                                          Will Obama ever address the fractional reserve system and the idea that our money is now debt based rather than credit based in regards to this banking crisis?

                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6118858,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"stupalski"}
                                                                                                                                            #25.119 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:41 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                            {"commentId":6118905,"authorDomain":"emosiman"}

                                                                                                                                            If these big car company are getting all these money, why can't we the customer who was misled by their greedy sales agent to buy the car with a baloon payment(15.95%), refinance our loan. The monthly payment is very high. If I can save a few hundred dollars a month, that same few hundred will go back to some other businesses and keep our economy going. It may extend the loan for another year or so, but that is exactly what the president have in mind. I think that there are hundred of people like myself out there, we will all appreciate what the government is doing for the big boys to save their company i think it should also help the little guy. Good luck

                                                                                                                                            {"commentId":6118905,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"emosiman"}
                                                                                                                                              #25.120 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:53 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6119155,"authorDomain":"tobydoesnj"}

                                                                                                                                              I noticed noone asked about the gay marriage debate that is still going on in California and that many people are still fighting for today. I like to hear our president's views on the current debate going on in California's courts about the possible revoking of the Prop 8 decision and what his plans are for gay citizen's equality?

                                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6119155,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tobydoesnj"}
                                                                                                                                                #25.121 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:24 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6119231,"authorDomain":"arthurmalcolmpena"}

                                                                                                                                                Mr. Barack Hussein Obama,

                                                                                                                                                I voted for you mostly because of your international life experiences, the way you literally incarnate both Africa and Europe, Christendom and the world of Islam, and your clearly articulated understanding of America's complicity in the problems of the world. And yet....you speak of the need to keep jobs "at home", and the need to "compete" on the world market, and the need to stay "number one". But, regarding the goal of "keeping jobs at home": doesn't that imply that any jobs we either "keep" here or "bring back" here from another country will mean that some other people, somewhere else in the world, will lose THEIR jobs? And, in a world so small and interdependent, won't any job loss we cause somewhere else on the globe ultimately, in some way, come back to haunt us (in the form of illegal immigration, political destabilization, poverty-related epidemics....etc. etc.)? How would you propose to take a truly world-wide view of the problems facing us? Is not America's fate truly bound to the fate of the whole world? From the perspective of human solidarity, of "we sink or swim together", how do you propose we achieve not only sustainable prosperity for the people of our own nation, but also for the people of every nation? And even more specifically, how do you propose to bring a sense of human solidarity to our relationship with Mexico, and to the problem of the border--a border across which, thanks to NAFTA, capital is free to pass at the speed of light, whereas the other side of the capitalist equation, human labor, fails to enjoy the same freedom of movement? And, most generally, how do you see yourself living out the international human reality you both genetically and personally embody?

                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6119231,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"arthurmalcolmpena"}
                                                                                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                #25.122 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:44 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6119412,"authorDomain":"tatateeta"}

                                                                                                                                                I read somewhere in this blog that you are going to throw out the right and left wing questions. Who decides what's right and left? I think it would be better just to ask the questions that get the most votes providing the voting process is protected against freeping.

                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6119412,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"tatateeta"}
                                                                                                                                                  #25.123 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:30 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6119530,"authorDomain":"ddbelknap"}

                                                                                                                                                  Now that we have clear evidence of war crimes (a public confession from the former vice president, "torture memos," testimony of former administration officials), I would like to know whether the president intends to allow an investigation and potential prosecution to go forward against the former administration. If not, how can we possibly regain credibility around the world and return to the rule of law in our own country?

                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6119530,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ddbelknap"}
                                                                                                                                                  • 4 votes
                                                                                                                                                  #25.124 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 7:00 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6119838,"authorDomain":"greg-stabile"}

                                                                                                                                                  Does Mr Obama plan to continue the War on Drugs as it has been run? Does this administration plan on continuing these vast expenditures at a time of economic ruin and also when countries like mexico are still being destabilized by Americas need for illicit drugs?

                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6119838,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"greg-stabile"}
                                                                                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                  #25.125 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 7:46 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6120169,"authorDomain":"lmichelec79"}

                                                                                                                                                  President Obama has indicated that he wants more accountability for teachers in our schools. I'm curious how he plans to enforce a policy to hold students more accountable for their classwork, homework, tests, and overall grades. The teachers can only do so much in a school day.

                                                                                                                                                  How will we make children understand how important their education is to their futures? The teachers cannot follow the kids home, make them sit down to do their homework, and make them study for an exam. How will we help those students who don't have a parent, parents, or guardian who cares whether they receive a good education and go to college?

                                                                                                                                                  My mother is a teacher in a very poor school district and is very passionate about her job, but that doesn't stop her frustration sometimes with students who come into her classroom everyday with nothing but the intention of wasting time and creating enough disruption to hinder others' learning too.

                                                                                                                                                  Dententions, etc. are not a sufficient deterrent, and she often feels abandoned by administration who either can't or don't want to do anything about it. How can we get our education system to where it needs to be with such challenges that at times seem so insurmountable?

                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6120169,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"lmichelec79"}
                                                                                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                  #25.126 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:18 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6120940,"authorDomain":"rosebennett1"}

                                                                                                                                                  Mr. President:

                                                                                                                                                  Do you feel as I do, that a root problem in our government and the relationship with our corporations, is how our political campaigns are funded?

                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6120940,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"rosebennett1"}
                                                                                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                  #25.127 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:17 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6121013,"authorDomain":"hicks3523"}

                                                                                                                                                  Chuck, please ask the following:

                                                                                                                                                  Regarding the administration's energy plan and as a first step, help relieve our dependence on foreign oil, would the President consider mandating that all government vehicles run on natural gas. Natural gas is home grown and would show the American public that we are doing something that's immediate and necessary to assist us in keeping our dollars in the US and not enriching our overseas suppliers.

                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6121013,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"hicks3523"}
                                                                                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                  #25.128 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:22 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6121496,"authorDomain":"mykennel"}

                                                                                                                                                  What is going to be done about helping home owners who are underwater with their mortgages but who are making the sacrifices necessary to keep their mortgages current? All of the current help is being given to people who have lost their jobs or who bought a bigger house than they should have but nothing is being done to help those stuck with 7%+ interest rates that they can't refinance because they are underwater. How about a little help for the people who think keeping their mortgage payments current is priority number one?

                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6121496,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"mykennel"}
                                                                                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                  #25.129 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:51 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6121497,"authorDomain":"Stuartw"}

                                                                                                                                                  Please explain the bank plan in simple, non-economics major's terms. Tell us the risks as well as the rewards and why you think one outweighs the other. Please don't use any acronyms or the word leverage. Finally, why do you think this is better than simple nationalization.

                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6121497,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"Stuartw"}
                                                                                                                                                    #25.130 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:51 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6121512,"authorDomain":"ullmannt"}

                                                                                                                                                    Pres. Obama, as a parent of a child with autism, and speaking for ALL such parents and children who are struggling with this lifelong challenge, does your first budget include the PROMISED funds to FULLY fund the Combatting autism Act?

                                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6121512,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ullmannt"}
                                                                                                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                                                                                                    #25.131 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:51 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6121571,"authorDomain":"garyg800"}

                                                                                                                                                    Getting past the current "bread & circus" treatment for AIG bonuses, is'nt the real issue the lack of regulation on the finance industry - stemming from the Reagan era?

                                                                                                                                                    (Chuck - please do use my name! - Mineola, NY)

                                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6121571,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"garyg800"}
                                                                                                                                                      #25.132 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:53 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6121604,"authorDomain":"sfbodamer"}

                                                                                                                                                      I want to know why there are hundreds of school districts in Massachusetts that are not receiving even a single penny from the Federal Education stimulus money given to the state? Thus, these districts are having to layoff hundreds of very good teachers, me most likely included. I'm sure Massachusetts isn't the only state in this predicament. This stimulus money was lauded as a way to keep good teachers employed......fails to do that in my opnion.

                                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6121604,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"sfbodamer"}
                                                                                                                                                        #25.133 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:54 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6121605,"authorDomain":"isaac-livingston"}

                                                                                                                                                        Now that some structure has been established concerning the process to aid struggling homeowners is positions where they may lose their homes due to extreme circumstance, but also poor choice; will there be assistance to those who manage to make the tough financial decisions and pull through on keeping their mortgages current?

                                                                                                                                                        My family is a single income family of three, my hours have been reduced to survive this current economic environment; we have made sacrifics to stay afloat. What is most concerning to us is that even though we are able to pay our mortgage, we still are 50K underwater in our loan to value ratio.

                                                                                                                                                        It seems as though those who made poor financial choices stand to get out from under this burden, and profit from it. If my tax dollars are funding this type of program, what type of relief can I expect in my situation; in regard to the 10 or 20 additional years that it will take my current investment to recover to the point of break-even?

                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6121605,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"isaac-livingston"}
                                                                                                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                        #25.134 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:54 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6121856,"authorDomain":"peterkee"}

                                                                                                                                                        Has the President ever considered "bailing out" average Americans who have lost 40%-60% of their 401Ks value? It seems to me and my neighbors that if you really want to stimulate the economy, making the American 401K holders financially whole would change the way they view the economy and start a spending shift that would then encourage the stock market and end the recession. I know it sounds too simple but one major reason for the continued economic slide is psychological. If the average American feels things are getting better, it will get better. Besides, the cost to restore 401Ks would be much less costly than some of the current "bail-outs" and more effective in a short period of time.

                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6121856,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"peterkee"}
                                                                                                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                        #25.135 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:03 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6121879,"authorDomain":"john-162"}

                                                                                                                                                        Chuck: My question: I own a small business with 15 employees and provide health insurance to my employees. I used an SBA Loan to purchase the business 10 years ago, and it is paid off. I have asked the SBA and my Bank for a new loan because of the current economic environment, but no luck. The Stimulus bill has provisions for the SBA to guarantee special loans to small business, and the SBA was supposed to put out the guidelines 3 weeks after the bill was signed. But it still has not communicated to the banks and I'm afraid I will have shut the business down. Why aren't small business owners being helped!!!!! Thanks for asking the question.

                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6121879,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"john-162"}
                                                                                                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                                                                                                        #25.136 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:04 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6121906,"authorDomain":"sandymyr"}

                                                                                                                                                        How about tax relief for Seniors and Disabled making less than $50,000 per year? It is extremely difficult having to pay taxes on a $16,000 widows pension even with Social Security Disability of $8000. This was one of the campaign promises and the reason I voted for him. Stop bailing out the rich and start making good on promises to those who need it most. While your at it do something about that joke called medicare part D and medicare in general. I have to pay about 200 per month for supplemental insurance just to cover the deductibles and copays plus the money medicare deducts. Doesn't leave a whole lot to live on.

                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6121906,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"sandymyr"}
                                                                                                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                        #25.137 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:05 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6122196,"authorDomain":"cathouse-75"}

                                                                                                                                                        I have an idea for the president that everyone seems to think might be a good question to ask that might help out the economy and create alot more jobs. I think the money that is given to all these banks and bailouts need to be more focused on the school systems. There hurting so much. I have family that works in the school systems and the funds are extemely low for them and the budgets are broke. I have seen at one point where I live, they had to stop the pre-K busses from running at one point because of no funding, and the children missed out on school last year. I think the president needs to focus more in this issue. Children are our fufture and if the school systems fail then where will America be in the near future?

                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6122196,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"cathouse-75"}
                                                                                                                                                          #25.138 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:13 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6122248,"authorDomain":"steve13"}

                                                                                                                                                          I would like to know why there is no help for those that have been laid off in the last year. The jobs that are being lost now are good paying $100-$150K jobs and unemployment compensation in inadequate to even pay mortgages much less keep a family going. Why aren't we looking at income averaging so that these people can get back taxes that they've paid in previous years? Why aren't we giving them 100% tax cuts for the next year to recover from their unemployment?

                                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6122248,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"steve13"}
                                                                                                                                                            #25.139 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:15 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                            {"commentId":6122271,"authorDomain":"juliesbauman"}

                                                                                                                                                            So if this administration is supposed to make us feel safe, then why is it trying to scare us into allowing them to initiate the seizure of non-bank financial companies, such as large insurers, investment firms and hedge funds? It's free enterprise, not communisism that Americans want....

                                                                                                                                                            {"commentId":6122271,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"juliesbauman"}
                                                                                                                                                              #25.140 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:16 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6122291,"authorDomain":"amc024"}

                                                                                                                                                              First of all I think that you are very thoughtful and considerate of us normal working American families by wanting to know what we feel and think about these issues. My question is since we are the ones footing the bill on all these bailouts and stimulus packages what would be wrong with giving us as stimulus by letting us go 4-6 weeks without paying any federal taxes.Now I do understand the importance of paying taxes but this is a short time frame and I think it would give a little "jolt" to the economy some people would pay up on their debt and bills others would put that extra in the bank andsome would even spend it at stores. Do you that would help out or would it be a waste of time?

                                                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6122291,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"amc024"}
                                                                                                                                                                #25.141 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:17 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6122342,"authorDomain":"a-ramasar13"}

                                                                                                                                                                Mr. President,

                                                                                                                                                                What are your goals for assistance for low-income familes? I am a single mother with a toddler. I make less than $25k a year, which, is not as less as some familes, but it still isn't enough to get out of the "ghetto", pay for daycare, or put food on my table every night. (I make too much to qualify for food stamps, or daycare assistance, or medicaid, but not enough to provide these things for myself). The only affordable housing for my budget is in areas that are known for people getting shot on a day to day basis. What is going to be done about this?

                                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6122342,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"a-ramasar13"}
                                                                                                                                                                • 3 votes
                                                                                                                                                                #25.142 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:18 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6122423,"authorDomain":"dennis-west"}

                                                                                                                                                                Mr. Presiden

                                                                                                                                                                I like most Americans want to know how the stimulus will help me, the typical middle class citizen that has seen his retirement funds nose dive and wonders if there will be anything left for me to retire on?

                                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6122423,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"dennis-west"}
                                                                                                                                                                • 3 votes
                                                                                                                                                                #25.143 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:20 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6122505,"authorDomain":"polly1-1"}

                                                                                                                                                                Part of your program to increase revenue is to allow the so-called tax breaks on the "wealthy" to expire. Considering that these individuals, as well as those who hardly qualify as "wealthy," have been subject to the higher, burdensome alternative minimum tax, how can raising the regular income tax rates on these individuals help increase revenue? The alternative minimum tax already exacts thousands of dollars per person from those subject to it.

                                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6122505,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"polly1-1"}
                                                                                                                                                                  #25.144 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:23 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6122509,"authorDomain":"edehler"}

                                                                                                                                                                  Chuck, let's start with the earmarks.He ran on a platform to end them,then he signs a bill with them in.I don't want to here the excuse that it is last years business.Just start doing what you said you were going to do.I voted for this guy based on what he said,now it's time to back up your words.Iraq is another issue,just get out and let them run their own country.It's been a black hole from day one.We don't need to continue dumping billions into that country.I'm sure we could use the billions in the US.

                                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6122509,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"edehler"}
                                                                                                                                                                    #25.145 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:23 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6122765,"authorDomain":"mrm477"}

                                                                                                                                                                    Sir:

                                                                                                                                                                    As a disclaimer, I voted for you, my wife voted for you, we pushed you on our family and friends who voted for you and we support you 100 per cent, so far.

                                                                                                                                                                    Yet the government has distributed billions to AIG, GM, Citibank and others and iis now planning to give trillions to the banking industry. My question is twofold:

                                                                                                                                                                    1. As an over 60 man with no health insurance, when do I get my billion? I'm not greedy. I'll settle for ten cents on the dollar. $100 million is fine for me. And.

                                                                                                                                                                    2. When did America stop being the land of opportunity and become the land of avarice?

                                                                                                                                                                    Thank you.

                                                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6122765,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"mrm477"}
                                                                                                                                                                      #25.146 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:30 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6122791,"authorDomain":"deby-1"}

                                                                                                                                                                      Could you directly ask the President when will our (we as Americans) Attorney General take the necessary steps to proceed with war crime investigations against the previous administration. If he skirts the issue ask him "when will he answer" to the American people. We want to Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney to be held accountable period. The President and his staff have an obligation to protect the American people and Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney violated acts that would be considered treason by any other. Yes, this may be touchy but the truth should be told and the people involved should be held responsible.

                                                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6122791,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"deby-1"}
                                                                                                                                                                      • 3 votes
                                                                                                                                                                      #25.147 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:30 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6122867,"authorDomain":"mctaverne"}

                                                                                                                                                                      One thing we have been talking about at work is the Cap and Trade system. Why is the Obama administration wanting to depend on the same Wall Street firms that messed up the mortgage market? Why not just go with a straight Carbon Tax? That way it would alleviate the possibility of corruption and be a lot simpler.

                                                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6122867,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"mctaverne"}
                                                                                                                                                                        #25.148 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:32 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6122901,"authorDomain":"linahoward"}

                                                                                                                                                                        When the nation is in such a financial crisis and education budgets are being squeezed, why are we providing education to non-residents and/or illegal aliens at our taxpayers' expense rather than shifting that money into making sure our own residents of the USA receive the highest educational value possible?

                                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6122901,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"linahoward"}
                                                                                                                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                                        #25.149 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:33 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6122943,"authorDomain":"f1-chaney"}

                                                                                                                                                                        I would like to know if anything is going to happen to the TVA bonuses?

                                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6122943,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"f1-chaney"}
                                                                                                                                                                          #25.150 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:34 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6122979,"authorDomain":"sueof3"}

                                                                                                                                                                          With all these businesses that are now being run by the government does president Obama feel like we are heading towards a Socalist government?

                                                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6122979,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"sueof3"}
                                                                                                                                                                            #25.151 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:35 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                            {"commentId":6123029,"authorDomain":"frenchtaz79"}

                                                                                                                                                                            Subject: $7,500 vs $8,000 house tax credit

                                                                                                                                                                            Three questions I would like to know, "Why do first-time homebuyers have to pay the $7,500 loan back when the others don't for the $8,000?", "There's an overlap of the time frame between the two, meaning, the $7,500 tax credit is for first-time home buyers between April 8, 2008 through July 1, 2009 and the $8,000 tax credit is for first-time home buyers between Jan through Dec 2009. Why is there an overlap?" and most importantly "Is it at all possible for the first-time home buyers not pay the $7,500 back?"

                                                                                                                                                                            Thank you.

                                                                                                                                                                            {"commentId":6123029,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"frenchtaz79"}
                                                                                                                                                                            • 2 votes
                                                                                                                                                                            #25.152 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:37 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                            {"commentId":6123134,"authorDomain":"kathy-24"}

                                                                                                                                                                            Hi Chuck,

                                                                                                                                                                            Regarding Tim Geithner's plan unveiled yesterday (I believe), whereby the Government would partner with the private sector to buy up the 'toxic assets' currently on a lot of banks' balance sheets:

                                                                                                                                                                            Question #1 is: won't this (the purchase of these assets) in itself generate more lending? (entirely possible, if the loans are made based current market value, with adequate downpayments). Or are we assuming the portion of the private sector that would get on board with this have cash to buy these assets?

                                                                                                                                                                            Secondly, one concern I heard mentioned on the news shows was that the government would probably pay too much money for these assets. Totally possible if the due diligence is not performed. If you think about it, there are innumerable homes in this 'boat', located all over the country. It would be difficult to come up with a price based on some internet research.

                                                                                                                                                                            Why not stimulate the economy, and get an appraisal done for each home? The appraiser can be hired to determine current 'market value', and doesn't even need to know that the appraisal is to be used to determine pricing for this buy up. Better yet, hire 2 appraisers per house, and tell them their work will be compared to the other's work, same house, same time frame. This could go a long way towards ensuring honesty, accuracy, and a 'non-biased' opinion of value on the part of the appraiser.

                                                                                                                                                                            Seriously, as a Certified Appraiser myself, if I got a call from a bank that said, we have 5 'market value' jobs for you, but we are only going to pay $250 - $300 per appraisal, I'd accept those jobs in a heartbeat. Times are tough.

                                                                                                                                                                            One other comment (I can't remember this entirely..) someone said that the only 'private sector' people or companies which can participate in the partnership are those who already own some huge amount of properties? Again, I don't exactly remember, but the gist of it is that the everyday common person won't have a chance to invest in these assets, only huge entities who already own hundreds of thousands of dollars in real estate can participate. I think that is wrong, perhaps because I don't have enough info. I don't see why they would limit who is on board based on current assets. If I had a partnership which qualified to buy 5 houses, why not allow me to get in and buy up a home (or homes) at or below current market value? It's a great time to buy real estate.

                                                                                                                                                                            Thanks for your time, continue the good work!

                                                                                                                                                                            {"commentId":6123134,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"kathy-24"}
                                                                                                                                                                              #25.153 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:40 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6123264,"authorDomain":"kohara"}

                                                                                                                                                                              The big question is what is going to be done to help the small business owner. I work for a small business that is affected by the housing crisis. I frequent small businesses affected by the downturn in the economy.....everyone is nervous and feeling the pinch. What is the plan for the REAL backbone of the economy, Main Street and the small business owners???

                                                                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6123264,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"kohara"}
                                                                                                                                                                                #25.154 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:44 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6123387,"authorDomain":"hotplug3"}

                                                                                                                                                                                Ask President Obama if we should expect 4 years of appearances on the Tonight Show, NCAA brackets and soft appearances on 60 Minutes; or if eventually he'll get around to tackling the bigger issues facing our country like immigration, tax reform, health care, the bailout, Iraq, North Korea, Iran, education? Its seems like there is plenty to be done in Washington that can't be done while he is cracking jokes with Jay Leno.

                                                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6123387,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"hotplug3"}
                                                                                                                                                                                  #25.155 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:47 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6123454,"authorDomain":"kansasdrummer"}

                                                                                                                                                                                  When is the U.S. government going to admit and give details on the past, and continuing visitation of extraterrestrials to our planet?
                                                                                                                                                                                  It's so obvious that they are here, and the political denial is only a slap-in-the-face to the public (and other world populations and governments) of the fact that they exist.
                                                                                                                                                                                  One of these days the perverbial "Landing on the White House Lawn" will take place, and it will only create more confusion and hestaria for the public masses.
                                                                                                                                                                                  Mr. President...you have the outstanding ability for communication with the people.
                                                                                                                                                                                  Why shouldn't you be the one?
                                                                                                                                                                                  To all of you reading this, who think this is just another 'crackpot', please keep an open mind. If you ever saw 'what I saw' you would think MUCH differently. It is just egotistic to think that we are all alone in this universe.

                                                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6123454,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"kansasdrummer"}
                                                                                                                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                                                  #25.156 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:49 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6123696,"authorDomain":"theresal"}

                                                                                                                                                                                  Mr. President

                                                                                                                                                                                  My family and friends want to know why these large greedy corporations are getting the bailout money when it clearly shows they have no intention of wanting to use it the right way. We have a solution. If the people get the bailout out money (it is our tax money) we can get ourselves out of debt. With that money the people can pay off their credit card debts, loans, mortgages, etc. then that money goes back into the banks, then we can invest in wall street, bonds, bills, etc.- then wall street will improve, then we can build up on our homes- the construction companies will grow again, as well as plumbing and electric and masonaries. With people paying off their car loans, the automotive industry will pick up because then the people can use that car to trade in to buy another one. The colleges will gain more students again. The demand for teachers will be greater and everyone will benefit including the retail stores.

                                                                                                                                                                                  Listen to the people Mr. President. It's not the CEO's of these Corporations that will save America. It's the people. The economy is struggling, because we are struggling.

                                                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6123696,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"theresal"}
                                                                                                                                                                                  • 2 votes
                                                                                                                                                                                  #25.157 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:56 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6123864,"authorDomain":"reneedickinson"}

                                                                                                                                                                                  Hi Mr. Todd,

                                                                                                                                                                                  Thanks for asking us for feedback.

                                                                                                                                                                                  I guess I want to know how the president is going to get the banks lending again, when most of the people the banks have to lend to are normal americans.....who due to the national mess and the economy alot of americans have gone through foreclosure and bankrupcy. Which means that you can't get a loan, you can't buy a home, you basically have to live a cash life. For those of us that were caught up in the national morgage crisis, this is the only thing we can do. So I don't see how President Obama can possibly get banks lending again, when we can't get a loan anyway.

                                                                                                                                                                                  thanks again for asking.....Renee'

                                                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6123864,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"reneedickinson"}
                                                                                                                                                                                    #25.158 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:00 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6124001,"authorDomain":"jeffagain"}

                                                                                                                                                                                    Mr President:

                                                                                                                                                                                    Last Fall, former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson received approval from the US Congress for the $700B TARP program, justifying it to both congress and the American people as necessary to purchase and remove the so-called "toxic assets" from the financial system in order to return stability and liquidity to the market. Within weeks, however, Treasury abandoned this effort and redirected those funds, without additional Congressional approval, towards consumer stimulus programs and purchasing equity in large financial institutions. Now yesterday, Treasury Secretary Geithner announced programs under which the federal government could purchase up to $2T in toxic assets. If, as Secretary Geithner suggests, toxic assets remain the linchpin to the financial crisis, where is the accountability of Treasury and other executive branch departments to Congress, and their and Congress' accountability to the American people? Why should the American people believe any executive branch request for funding, whether it be for stimulus purposes or for addressing the financial crisis directly, will in fact be used for the purpose justifying the request?

                                                                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6124001,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"jeffagain"}
                                                                                                                                                                                      #25.159 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:04 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6124057,"authorDomain":"JACK9999"}

                                                                                                                                                                                      Thank you for an opportunity to ask the president a question. I have struggled for years to pay my mortgage, raise my son, and pay my bills on time. I've worked two jobs (and I'm working two jobs again now)-- and now I've taken a 38% pay cut as my employer founders in this battered economy. What my neighbors and I see is that there seems to be no help for us people in the middle who get up and go to work every day... so here's my question:

                                                                                                                                                                                      Mr President, why not set the mortgage rate and the credit card rate at 4.5% for EVERYBODY, regardless of their current credit standing, and let the hardworking people get some real help? If you mandate this rate, the economy would explode with home building, people would instantly have credit access at reasonable rates, you'd bypass the crippling choke-hold the credit, mortgage and banking industry have on Americans, and those poeple that truly cannot afford the homes they have right now, would sort themselves out. We need some help here in the middle Mr. President. Force the industries that caused this to do the belt tightening.

                                                                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6124057,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"JACK9999"}
                                                                                                                                                                                      • 2 votes
                                                                                                                                                                                      #25.160 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:06 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6124116,"authorDomain":"pauls-4"}

                                                                                                                                                                                      When and in what form will the average American actually SEE some change in their paycheck, or income tax return, or retirement fund? What do we look for? When do we start looking?

                                                                                                                                                                                      {"commentId":6124116,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"pauls-4"}
                                                                                                                                                                                        #25.161 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:08 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6124223,"authorDomain":"robyn-leann"}

                                                                                                                                                                                        Why not eliminate the payroll tax, except social security, medicare, medicaid, to increase employees' paychecks. This would encourage spending more money thus creating jobs. Second, redo the tax codes to have a sales tax (10%) rather than a personal income tax. Those who make more money usually buy more expensive items and those who make less are more frugal. Example: A person making$100,000/year will buy a Lexus compared to a person making $24,000/year probably would buy a Kia, thus richer people pay more taxes through sales tax. Thank you for this chance to voice an opinion, if you want more details call me at 224-805-7976.

                                                                                                                                                                                        {"commentId":6124223,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"robyn-leann"}
                                                                                                                                                                                          #25.162 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:11 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6124420,"authorDomain":"ccfit1"}

                                                                                                                                                                                          Hi Chuck,

                                                                                                                                                                                          To add a little levity, ask him how his girls feel about his pre-empting "IDOL"?

                                                                                                                                                                                          {"commentId":6124420,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ccfit1"}
                                                                                                                                                                                            #25.163 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:17 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                            {"commentId":6124473,"authorDomain":"movit3"}

                                                                                                                                                                                            hello ,

                                                                                                                                                                                            my question is " now that min wage has taken hold , an now prices are screaming on every product , how will this action be taimed " ? it is showing no end an has failed to allow us to compete on the world market . thanks for the intrest .

                                                                                                                                                                                            {"commentId":6124473,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"movit3"}
                                                                                                                                                                                              #25.164 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:19 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6124583,"authorDomain":"porktaco72"}

                                                                                                                                                                                              Is it true that the top twenty banks were forced by the treasury dept to take bailout money to avoid a run on banks that were worse off (Citi etc...) not allowed to pay it back immediately and is that fair to the employees who are now the subject of public rage (AIG not withstanding) and 90% tax on their bonuses, even if their were not involved in the decision making of accpeting the terms of the bailout?

                                                                                                                                                                                              {"commentId":6124583,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"porktaco72"}
                                                                                                                                                                                                #25.165 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:22 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6124685,"authorDomain":"ncroft-mls"}

                                                                                                                                                                                                I would like to know since 60% of all forclosures contain renters in the home what does he plan to do to protect the renters from last minute notices to move. I personally have been through this 5 times in 2 years. I have lost thousands of dollars in deposits and moving expenses, while destroying my credit by skipping payments on my loans just to keep a roof over my family's head due to last minute notices. So far I have no recoarse to recover my losses and no credit to buy a home. What is he gonna do for the thousands of people across america that have gone through this same thing?

                                                                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6124685,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"ncroft-mls"}
                                                                                                                                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                                                                #25.166 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:24 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6124868,"authorDomain":"shirleemeola"}

                                                                                                                                                                                                My question for your interview is: Geither is expected to ask lawmakers to create an oversite authority for the financial service industry. There had been an oversight = regulatory system in place for loans and other financial instruments that Geither and other cronies of the Bush regime had dismantled for the benefit of the wealthy. If Obama is indeed for "change" why did he appoint one of Bush's proven incompetents and toady for the wealthy upper 1% ?

                                                                                                                                                                                                {"commentId":6124868,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"shirleemeola"}
                                                                                                                                                                                                  #25.167 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:30 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6124894,"authorDomain":"lynloo62"}

                                                                                                                                                                                                  With the current state of the economy and so many people who are losing or have lost their homes, I have an idea to help those who need the help the most and that doesn't mean the banks.

                                                                                                                                                                                                  Wouldn't it be more pragmatic to have the government take over the loans on foresclosures that have occured in the past year or two and any in the next year or so? The governement could then take the $25,000 you are talking about giving the banks to encourage them to make new loans and apply it to these home loans to give these people a chance to keep their homes. The money would still go back into the economy and some people might actually gain a little faith in their government again.

                                                                                                                                                                                                  The banks are already getting all the money they can from customers by charging fees in every instance they can and holding any customer funds as long as they can. They don't need anymore of a bail-out than did AIG.

                                                                                                                                                                                                  {"commentId":6124894,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"lynloo62"}
                                                                                                                                                                                                    #25.168 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:31 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6124970,"authorDomain":"daddycliff"}

                                                                                                                                                                                                    Here's a question, Mr. Todd, that is, if it hasn't been asked a hundred times before...You may re-word it if you choose to use it.

                                                                                                                                                                                                    Okay, Mr Obama. How is your stimulus going to help the average American Citizen? First, the mortgage help to forestall foreclosures. What about those people who only rent, but still are having a hard time making their housing payments? And what about those who were approved for a mortgage, only to lose it because they became unemployed? The plan doesn't help them. Second, the "working tax credit" that every "working" American will receive, to the tune of about $400 per year. How does that help those who are unemployed? And how is a miserly $400 over the course of a whole year, about $7.70 a week, really going to help anyone? Don't you realize that it is the Average, Middle Class American who truly drives this economy, and if they are not personally being helped, then how can they help drive the economy? Bailout banks and automakers all you want, but if America cannot afford to buy their products, they will not make money, until the government gives it to them. A vicious circle, once again. Any comments?

                                                                                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6124970,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"daddycliff"}
                                                                                                                                                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                                                                                                                                                    #25.169 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:33 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6125098,"authorDomain":"mpswanson"}

                                                                                                                                                                                                    Hi Chuck

                                                                                                                                                                                                    I would like to know what the administration's plans are to assist graduates that have large school loan debts and can't find a job that pays them enough to make them loan payments. Case in point, my daughter graduated from law school in 2007. She has a job with the Att. Gen. office in Mo., but she only makes enough to pay rent, car note, and necessities. She now has to start paying $800.00 monthly in school loans and has no idea how she can meet all of her obligations. Is there any help out there?

                                                                                                                                                                                                    momof7

                                                                                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6125098,"threadId":"530245","contentId":"2558100","authorDomain":"mpswanson"}
                                                                                                                                                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                                                                                                                                                    #25.170 - Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:36 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                                    {"commentId":6125099,"authorDomain":"tdvorak2000"}

                                                                                                                                                                                                    Chuck:

                                                                                                                                                                                                    Here are two questions you can ask the President:

                                                                                                                                                                                                    (1) Given the recent proposal in Congress to impose a 90% income tax on the AIG bonus recipients, wouldn't it make more sense to impose a 90% corporate income tax on the recipients of income from the Credit Default Swaps that AIG is paying out to the big banks? This would seem to be a good r